The Student Room Group

Edexcel A-level Politics Paper 1 (9PL0 01) - 23rd May 2023 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Keenbean29
Socialism notes ( not sure how good they are as they’re from last year lol)

Thank you so much
Reply 81
Original post by inahuff
no i love socialism - my liberalism lessons consisted of us sitting on logs in the woods and the class collectively writing one guys personal statement last summer tho


what on earth😭
Reply 82
thank you so much
Original post by Keenbean29
Socialism notes ( not sure how good they are as they’re from last year lol)
Original post by dancingcabbage52
I'm thinking liberalism will come up too. I hope so - it's my best ideology! But do you think that they might do two of the same ideology - since there is two options? They've never done that before, but it still might be a possibility.

I think they always use two different ideologies
Reply 84
For ideology qs do you guys link them to modern day examples in uk politics - is this a requirement? like are we meant to make synoptic links to other component 1 topics like political parties? It doesn't mention it in the spec and I don't normally do this but yeah I hope its not a requirement...
Reply 85
Original post by samuelwildblood
I think they always use two different ideologies

Technically they can do two questions on the same, and they explicitly say they can on the spec i think, but they never have
Reply 86
Original post by sglelfe
For ideology qs do you guys link them to modern day examples in uk politics - is this a requirement? like are we meant to make synoptic links to other component 1 topics like political parties? It doesn't mention it in the spec and I don't normally do this but yeah I hope its not a requirement...


My teacher always says you can mention it briefly when it is incredibly closely linked ie Giddens' Third Way and Blair, and Nozick for New Right / Thatcherism but other than that probably don't mention it
Reply 87
Original post by samuelwildblood
I think they always use two different ideologies


I can't find the original post but my teacher said they normally use 2 also because they already give us 2 qs on one ideology for non core
Reply 88
Original post by beccacrw
what on earth😭

My politics teacher isn’t great, our lessons were mental and not particularly educational. However, I must say the videos we made were delightful.
Reply 89
Original post by sglelfe
im currently trying to grasp socialism rn its been like two days and its just long, same goes for conservatism :frown: how do u even understand it

With ideologies I use each thinkers view of human nature as a jumping off point and the rest of their beliefs sort of fill themselves in from there. Anyone with liberalism notes and I’ll love you forever.
Reply 90
idk if this is a dumb question but are we allowed to argue that the lib dems are not a major party? like ik the spec says they sill are but
Reply 91
Original post by rosezee1121
the act made voter ID compulsory and it would fit in well for an essay on democracy and participation as it limits the idea of free elections as some groups are less likely to have ID


ofc, after researching it a bit more it makes more sense.
thank you
Reply 92
Original post by anonhehe
idk if this is a dumb question but are we allowed to argue that the lib dems are not a major party? like ik the spec says they sill are but

Yeah probably apply a bit of nuance though, say theyve declined heavy since 2010 but could also bring up strong by-election and local election results during the last couple of years. If predictions are anything to go buy they could end up in gov with Labour next election so they’re not completely dead yet
Someone told me that I should look at political parties, specifically a debate question about parties drifting from original values, but I cant find any questions or examples of what this sort of question could be like.

Also, any predictions for the 30 marker non source? I find sources fine as they pretty much give you the points already and liberalism... well... my teacher didn't teach us any of the ideologies so I had to do it all self-taught and gave up lmao
Original post by Tarz786
The view that opinion polls do undermine the legitimacy of elections:

- One key reason why is that opinion polls that is provided by the newspaper company may have a political bias towards a party, or a decision that favours them, and thus go to a safe seat within the UK which guarantee a result that would benefit them. For example, the Sun news and Daily Mail have a political bias towards the Conservative party, and may collect their sample for the opinion poll from a Conservative safe seat to deter votes their way. For example, the Sun may collect their data from Hitchin and Harpenden Constituency, which has been a safe seat for the Conservative party for a long time.
Counter Arguments: Opinion Polls are also done by the BBC, who are under legal authority to act as unbiased and impartial when talking about political matters and issues most of the time, due to them having a large influence and audience. If they were not in any circumstance - could be penalised.
- Another key reason: Higher consumption of media from unreliable sources, corrupts the view of a voter. Due to the rise of use of social media, and the slow decline of use of newspapers and TV, there has also been a rise of unrealiable newsoutlets which can corrupt, lie to the reader or even deter the view of an individual to a higher extent and change or even corrupt their political views to extremism in rare cases. This of which has research to back up. Thus, the high pressure from certified newsoutlets and even some Governments applying pressure to large social media platforms such as the new META team who own Facebook and Instagram as well as Twitter to ensure they put Fact checkers to ensure the consumers do not get confused or lied to.
Counter Arguments: The Echo Chamber theory, only allows an individual to see whatever he wants, and is able to verify what they should and should not believe when going through social media.

The view that opinion polls do not undermine the legitimacy of elections:
- A key reason why opinion polls do not undermine elections is due to the fact that opinion polls a lot of the time, especiialy in recent history have not always gone as planned. This can be seen in referendum's more particularly than in elections, but it thus shows the idea that opoinion polls do not undermine the legitimacy of elections since they are both democratic means of making a decision. Thus, the best example of opinion polls not undermining legitimacy is the 2016 BREXIT Referendum, if we are looking for an election, we can use the 2010 General Election, which led to a coalition gov. between Nick Clegg's Liberal Democrats, and David Cameron's Conservatives.
Counter Argument: It's more consistent to be inaccurate within referenda's than elections due to differences between direct and representative democracies, and the First Past the Post system being unproportional to the actual vote.
This is what I made from the top of my head, let me know if that's good couldn't be bothered to write a conclusion and introduction.

(IF YOU ARE USING A SOURCE QUESTION DO NOT USE THIS SINCE FOR SOURCE QUESTION ALL YOUR POINTS HAVE TO COME FROM THE SOURCE OF THE QUESTION AND THEN YOU ELABORATE ON WHY IT IS IMPORTANT)


I really hate how in this subject they expect you to just give 6 evaluations on random topics that you get taught in about 5 minutes and on half a page of a textbook... idk if im doing something wrong because it feels like im missing something
(edited 11 months ago)
Reply 95
Original post by Acetylcholinefan
Someone told me that I should look at political parties, specifically a debate question about parties drifting from original values, but I cant find any questions or examples of what this sort of question could be like.

Also, any predictions for the 30 marker non source? I find sources fine as they pretty much give you the points already and liberalism... well... my teacher didn't teach us any of the ideologies so I had to do it all self-taught and gave up lmao

something like evaluate the view that the conservative party has abandoned principles of one nation conservatism or has adopted thatcherite principles etc.

i think non source could be representative democracy, referendums, or extending the franchise. wouldn't bet against electoral systems coming up again either
Reply 96
Original post by Acetylcholinefan
I really hate how in this subject they expect you to just give 6 evaluations on random topics that you get taught in about 5 minutes and on half a page of a textbook... idk if im doing something wrong because it feels like im missing something

i guess they just expect you to continuously keep up with the news. its the same with history tbh they can ask you a whole question based on one paragraph in the textbook bc you're expected to do wider reading for more knowledge
Original post by anonhehe
How accurate are teacher predictions usually, in terms of correctly predicting the topics that are likely to be asked?


It just comes down to luck tbh, teachers can make assumptions but there's absolutely no guarantee they are going to be correct. Exam boards are unpredictable.
Reply 98
Im so stressed for tuesday and everyone is giving different predictions ugh is anyone sure of something that will defo come up or topics i dont need to worry about
Reply 99
Hi! In our 30 markers could we talk about the future/possibilities, maybe not as main points but as evaluation for one of points. For example, the rise of the Lib Dems in the next election could create a two and a half/three party system again?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending