This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
Why isn't there a 'pride' for Paedophiles, too?
Scroll to see replies
Dan1989
Didn't say I don't recognise Homosexuality at all! That is a thing between consenting adults, therefore cannot be legally wrong. Paedophiles though are a risk because their lusture and attraction is to children, posing a risk. I hope you have nothing to do with the Criminal justice system or children at all in your life. World needs less people like you!
Actually babe I do work with children. omgzz!!1 Get me away from them.
Fancying children isn't legally wrong either. My God, do think a little before you respond.
just because it is genetic does not justify it 
after all , personalities for example, are said to be part genetic -say if you were born with the natural disposition to be a sadist does that mean ushould proud of it?
or if you were a psychopath or somethink
after all , personalities for example, are said to be part genetic -say if you were born with the natural disposition to be a sadist does that mean ushould proud of it?
or if you were a psychopath or somethink
Tasha-twi
because you think it is ok for people to look at child porn. that is utterly disgusting. You have no idea what those children go through! These children are being abused. Its absolutely horrific.
No-one is saying that the production of child pornography is okay, but if it's already been produced, how does one more person viewing it actually harm anyone?
strawberrywine_
Fancying a child isn't wrong, abusing them without consent is.
I'd say abusing them is wrong under consensual circumstances too, but I think that's just clumsy syntax on your part.
strawberrywine_
Homosexuality used to be against the law too, or didn't you know that? That doesn't mean that homosexuality was wrong. I'll say it again; peadophilia isn't wrong, this doesn't make me "sick".
Fancying a child isn't wrong, abusing them without consent is.
Fancying a child isn't wrong, abusing them without consent is.
Of course I know homosexuality used to be a crime, and still is in some countries(where you can be sentenced to death for your so called "crime"). Also it wasn't me that said you were "sick" everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and that doesn't make you sick....
It's my opinion that fancying a child is wrong, because it's a stepping stone to other things.
Just because someone has an urge that's predetermined by one's genetics, it doesn't make acting upon that justified or right.
Homosexuality is between two consenting adults, whether it's a sexual act or the act or getting involved in a loving relationship.
Paedophillia isn't between two consenting adults and as such cannot be a justified or right act whether the aim is purely sex or having some form of relationship.
Hence you can't be proud of it. It's wrong.
Homosexuality is between two consenting adults, whether it's a sexual act or the act or getting involved in a loving relationship.
Paedophillia isn't between two consenting adults and as such cannot be a justified or right act whether the aim is purely sex or having some form of relationship.
Hence you can't be proud of it. It's wrong.
Because it's illegal to act on paedophilic desires, but not to act on homosexual ones. I seriously doubt the police would allow a paedophile pride march to take place, and if they did, there'd be flaming torches abound. No-one would dare take part. There are organisations though... I remember hearing about one called butterfly something supporting female paedophilia...
I'm sure there are a lot of people who get off on the idea of having sex with children, but don't act upon there instincts because they have the will power to do so. It's hardly illegal, because that's how they're made. Genes and that. Everyone thinks, paedophile ewwwwww. But the individual can't do anything about it. If it is genetic then they shouldn't be stigmatised. If a gay person had sex with another man without consent the person should be arrested. Similarly a paedophile should only be thought off in a negative light only if the individual molested/raped a minor, who is unable to give consent.
Tasha-twi
because you think it is ok for people to look at child porn. that is utterly disgusting. You have no idea what those children go through! These children are being abused. Its absolutely horrific.
I'm saying it is better than them themselves contributing to child abuse. Women in porn go through a lot too, that doesn't mean porn should be banned. Obviously child porn shouldn't be legally allowed to be made, that's not what I'm saying, but if you fancy children, clearly you'll like looking at child porn, which is better than actively contributing to the act.
I'm not "sick".
numb3rb0y
No-one is saying that the production of child pornography is okay, but if it's already been produced, how does one more person viewing it actually harm anyone?
Creating a demand for child pornography doesn't harm anyone?
Tasha-twi
so you think its ok for people to look at child porn do you? Dont call me a fascist!
I call it how I see it. Viewing child pornography != producing it. Paying for it might well be considered wrong, but viewing alone does not cause harm in any way, shape, or form, and as such there is nothing immoral about it.
Tasha-twi
because you think it is ok for people to look at child porn. that is utterly disgusting. You have no idea what those children go through! These children are being abused. Its absolutely horrific.
Oh, the abuse! The rape! The sin!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
NB. Am am not a paedophile, but I'm also not merely trolling here.
strawberrywine_
Actually babe I do work with children. omgzz!!1 Get me away from them.
Fancying children isn't legally wrong either. My God, do think a little before you respond.
Fancying children isn't legally wrong either. My God, do think a little before you respond.
I feel deeply deeply sorry for any child that is in contact with you. 'Poor Mr Paedophile having these nasty urges....Here's some child porn for you, atleast this way you won't harm anyone!?'
Shame it's glorifying the ABUSE of children...
Kelly^2
Do you not think there is something wrong with a person who has sexual fantasies about children? Seriously?
Yes, seriously. It's not a choice. I don't think fancying the same sex, opposite sex, animals, children, or anything else is wrong. Who determines what is wrong anyway? As long as they don't abuse children, it's fine.
strawberrywine_
Of course they can, I get urges sometimes (not peadophilic ) it doesn't mean I can't control them. And anyway, if child porn is there then why shouldn't they look at it?
) it doesn't mean I can't control them. And anyway, if child porn is there then why shouldn't they look at it?So because Child porn is available, your condoning it's use.
Veni_vidi
you see by saying it's genetic it gives them more reasoning for going round doing such horrific acts, it's not genetic and shouldn't be accepted as one.
soon we'll be seeing paedophiles facing charges but getting away with it because it's their genetic form.
soon we'll be seeing paedophiles facing charges but getting away with it because it's their genetic form.
It is no less genetic than homosexuality... The only difference being that paedophiles can not sate their lust without harming an innocent person. They are victims of fate, because unlike people with other sexual preferences, they can only get pleasure through abuse of a third party. They are not "evil" by definition... And being a paedophile ISN'T a crime by itself, it's a crime once you get desperate to the point of actually going through the act of molesting a victim. It's not the actual paedophilia that's the crime, it's the molesting that is. And no, arguing against the idea that all paedophiles are somehow "evil" even when they haven't harmed anyone does not make a person a paedophile.
Latest
Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 4 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 4 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
