> I am heavily against FTT (Financial Transactions Tax) and if it is to go ahead on an EU-wide scale I would vote out. It is hurtful to the UK economy as our financial sector is strategic.
> I am heavily against new EU members from the East. It was a bad decision in the first place to extend in the early 2000s to countries considerably poorer. Although these countries are now almost similar, we shouldn't bend over backwards to give them benefit, there is no benefit to us therefore there shouldn't be a benefit for them. Entry requirements should be tweaked to roughly 75% of EU GDP per capita to even be considered. (Limit EU entry to Iceland, Norway and Switzerland for the next 20 years)
> EU should be refocused onto the Economy and not Legislation. All these regulations standardisation is fine. It's beautiful. But the EU is now beginning to infringe onto business rights. EU has become a raging liberal.
> EU should not be supreme. There should be penalties and incentives to join EU legislation, but by no means should it be enforced through "EU courts"
> EU should decentralise even further - almost all EU agencies are in the Benelux area. Currently, only the Border agency (Frontex) is in Poland, Internal Market (Regulation liberalisation) Agency is in Spain and Banking & Police Colleges are in the UK. These are all pretty irrelevant, and should be more spread out. The EU Commission, being the heart of the EU, should be in the heart of Europe. The Parliament and Council should be relocated. To Rome and Warsaw, perhaps.
> TTIP must go ahead. If it doesn't I'm not even interested in staying. All those Southern European and Eastern European countries which want to veto it should be kicked out immediately. I would then vote out and prefer the UK to make an independent free trade agreement with the US & Canada.
> No migrant relocation. I'm just not interested. The UK is the most densely populated major economy in the EU, and we should not be receiving anyone. The burden should be on Sweden, Germany and France who are pressuring us to take in people we should not be taking in.
> "Speeds" of Europe must be sorted out. This concept of the "two-speed" Europe where Eurozone and non-Eurozone countries head different ways should be standardised and made into appropriate legislation which does not hurt either side. It's unsustainable to have two widely different growth rates.
> MEPs need a reform. The concept that an area of 90 000 Germans in Belgium has the same amount of MEPs as 1 000 000 people in London is frivolous, to say the least.
> Sovereign states should have the right to decide on welfare regulation for foreigners. No one should be able to move to another country purely for the welfare, and no one who comes from a different country should be able to receive welfare if averaged over their time in the UK their earnings were below that of a neutral taxpayer (revenue from them equaled expenditure on them) which is about 25 500. Anyone below that shouldn't get unemployment benefits if they get unemployed etc.
> The host country should not pay for foreigners who need welfare - the native country should do that. When a Pole gets unemployed in the UK, it should be Poland that pays the expense.
> Free Movement of People should be about free visas, not literal free movement. Numbers should be controlled and people who commit crime should be deported. (I will also go against the general consensus here and say that current numbers are fine. (100k a year on average. most of immigration is from non-EU, take this into consideration: if we outlawed non-eu immigration, we would have negative migration)
> CAP (Agriculture buffer stocks) should be abolished. They are infringing on free trade and drive up food costs. The 18th century rural Frenchmen should just accept that their trade is long irrelevant. The EU budget should be only used to run EU agencies and for policing (border) operations such as Italy now. It should also be used as a SWO and be there for a 'rainy day'. Regional Development funding should not be priority, it is not our responsibility to make sure rural Romania develops.
Europe should be about a single market, free trade, regulation liberalisation/standardisation and solidarity. Not about supreme rule and irrelevant legislation.
I will however go against the general anti-EU consensus that it should disband, or that free movement should be abolished or that students should pay foreign fees. I would call myself a "soft Eurosceptic", but not against the general idea of EU.
TL;DR I am open to change, but in the current form I would vote out. (unless TTIP passes anyway then I may be more swayed towards in, despite the problems.)