Emma Watson named in latest Panama Papers leak

Of course your second point is true, but I don't see how you get to your first - she's had no history of being disbelieved or deceitful, I think we should give her the benefit of the doubt on what she says the reasons were.

Clearly what's needed is a mechanism for allowing people targeted by possible stalking, etc, to keep their names secret on the Land Registry, then she wouldn't need to do this. However, I obviously agree that what goes on in the tax havens is ridiculous and contrary to our interests, I just don't like seeing her singled out for attacks on this when it's not to do with tax.

Pfft, as if you'd even get the chance. Stop feeling so entitled. Women aren't your play things.

So Emma Watson is a terrorist now?

'While a spokesman for the actress confirms that Watson set up an offshore company, they say it was set up for the sole purpose of ‘protecting her anonymity and safety’. The spokesman tells Steerpike that the actress receives ‘no tax or monetary advantages from this offshore company’

^ read the article correctly before jumping to conclusions, mate. Also, Emma Watson is trying to raise awareness of the issues that women still face. There's nothing wrong with that. But people are going to hate no matter what, particularly when it concerns feminism.


Posted from TSR Mobile

You are the reason feminism is even relevant yet like your average twatty male you probably bitch and cry about that movement.

I love how all of you are just focusing on how attractive or not she is. Literally just proving why her speeches and comments, and feminist attitudes generally, were necessary.

Saying she isn't pretty, lmfao, grow up - your standards are beyond the clouds.

Oh and by the way, I do think what has happened is wrong but you're all showing yourselves to be utter pricks. Focus on the issue under scrutiny, not whether or not she manages to help you get your penis up in the morning. Ridiculous.

Indirect and whiny? Look at your ********ty and tenuous point. They didn't hire a 10 year old because they got boners from her - grow the **** up. I have heard her speech and she hit the nail on the head.

Lol i wouldn't though
subpar rack + aggressive feminist + too thin = It's a no from me

Of course your second point is true, but I don't see how you get to your first - she's had no history of being disbelieved or deceitful, I think we should give her the benefit of the doubt on what she says the reasons were.

Clearly what's needed is a mechanism for allowing people targeted by possible stalking, etc, to keep their names secret on the Land Registry, then she wouldn't need to do this. However, I obviously agree that what goes on in the tax havens is ridiculous and contrary to our interests, I just don't like seeing her singled out for attacks on this when it's not to do with tax.

Get real.

I suppose you utterly condemn all the attacks the leftards at the BBC and Guardian made re Cameron's father too??

That was nothing to do with tax either (it was all repatriated to the UK and declared to HMRC) and it wasn't even Cameron doing it.

It was his father!

I don't think my point is being understood. I will simplify:

1/ I'm against offshore tax havens full stop.

2/ I'm against people who use them to evade or avoid tax.

3/ Emma Watson says that isn't what she's doing.

4/ Until someone can demonstrate that she's lying, I think we should believe what she says - she isn't a politician or a national leader and she has no reputation for lying.

5/ That still doesn't make it right, but she is being attacked for the wrong thing.

I suspect the reasons people are piling into her are (1) jealousy - lots of that on display in this thread and (2) sexism - a woman has no right to defend her privacy if she's rich and famous.

5/ That still doesn't make it right, but she is being attacked for the wrong thing.

I suspect the reasons people are piling into her are (1) jealousy - lots of that on display in this thread and (2) sexism - a woman has no right to defend her privacy if she's rich and famous.

You swear so much in your posts...

Indirect and whiny? Look at your ********ty and tenuous point. They didn't hire a 10 year old because they got boners from her - grow the **** up. I have heard her speech and she hit the nail on the head.

I understood you perfectly and I agree with you actually about the jealousy animus.

My point was simply that the attacks on Cameron through his father were unfair for EXACTLY the same reason.
...............

Avoid tax.

Do you agree that the attacks on Cameron were similarly unfair? And if you don't, why not?

(2) sexism - a woman has no right to defend her privacy if she's rich and famous.