If you don't understand that in most cases you will be better off as a result of the recent changes to Student Finance, you shouldn't be going to university.
If you are aggrieved about tuition fees changing from the last set of arrangements, you know little about it, and are lapping up the alarmist claims of 'triple the cost' with absolutely no understanding of what it actually means.
Most students will actually end up better off, repaying 9% of whatever you earn over £21,000 rather than the rest repaying at 9% of anything over (approx) £15,000.
Those who end up paying more than they would under the past scheme will be relatively high earners effectively subject to a graduate tax, which loads of students were screaming for in the first place when the question of how to pay for higher education funding arose.
Those who achieve little from their education bar an average salary will end up paying less. Those who are more successful on (very much) above average salaries will pay more.
Indeed, aren't those screaming the loudest the left wingers amongst you saying that the rich should pay for your education? Well, those paying more than they would have under the old arrangements will be the 'rich'.
Although in line with most left wing arguments, the taxes that are always the most popular are those that other people (the rich) have to pay, so on the whole it's unsurprising to find that they aren't in so much favour when it turns out that they have to pay it themselves, because comparatively speaking, they will be 'the rich'.
Do the maths. Work out how much more/less you will be paying on a given salary using the figures given for the old repayments compared to those for the old repayments.
On £30,000, which is a very much above average salary, you can expect to repay £800 annually now compared with £1,283