The Student Room Group

what are the chances of rolling 20 6's in a row using a dice?

just had a long ass argument with a housemate stoned off our faces. what are the chances of rolling 20 6's in a row using a dice? i told him i can roll 20 times and get 20 6's on my first attempt, he said it's virtually impossible

none of us had scientific calculators so used google - (1/6)^20 = 2.7351112e^-16

how small is this number? what are we dealing with?

1/billion+ ?

1/trillion+ ?

ty in advance. can't seem to get an exact decimal for this e^-16 **** online

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by shartos maximus
just had a long ass argument with a housemate stoned off our faces. what are the chances of rolling 20 6's in a row using a dice? i told him i can roll 20 times and get 20 6's on my first attempt, he said it's virtually impossible

none of us had scientific calculators so used google - (1/6)^20 = 2.7351112e^-16

how small is this number? what are we dealing with?

1/billion+ ?

1/trillion+ ?

ty in advance. can't seem to get an exact decimal for this e^-16 **** online


Put it this way, you have a higher chance of winning the lottery :wink:
but if i had a dice right now there's nothing stopping me from getting 20 6's in 20 throws, amirite
Reply 3
Original post by shartos maximus
but if i had a dice right now there's nothing stopping me from getting 20 6's in 20 throws, amirite


But there might be a higher chance of you getting a heart attack, thus meaning you couldn't actually roll the dice 20 times because, well, you'd be dead.
Reply 4
Original post by shartos maximus
just had a long ass argument with a housemate stoned off our faces. what are the chances of rolling 20 6's in a row using a dice? i told him i can roll 20 times and get 20 6's on my first attempt, he said it's virtually impossible

none of us had scientific calculators so used google - (1/6)^20 = 2.7351112e^-16

how small is this number? what are we dealing with?

1/billion+ ?

1/trillion+ ?

ty in advance. can't seem to get an exact decimal for this e^-16 **** online


2.7351112e^-16 simply means 2.7351112 x 10^-16, which is 1/2.7351112x10^16, or in context, 1 out of (approximately) 27 quadrillion rolls.

So no, you can't roll 20 6s on your first attempt; if you do, buy a lottery ticket ASAP, because you be some kickass lucky mother****er!! :tongue:
Original post by Mr Porter
But there might be a higher chance of you getting a heart attack, thus meaning you couldn't actually roll the dice 20 times because, well, you'd be dead.
but there's also the chance that i manage to get 20/20 6's mid-heart attack - whether i end up rolling it with my hands or my face
Original post by Ceryni
2.7351112e^-16 simply means 2.7351112 x 10^-16, which is 1/2.7351112x10^16, or in context, 1 out of (approximately) 27 quadrillion rolls.

So no, you can't roll 20 6s on your first attempt; if you do, buy a lottery ticket ASAP, because you be some kickass lucky mother****er!! :tongue:
1 out of 27 quadrillion rolls =/= 0

i have a chance

next..
Reply 7
2.735111228e^-16

This is one in 3.656 QUADRILLION (Million million million million)

The odds of winning the UK national lottery is about 7.15e^-8. About one in 13.984 million.
Reply 8
Original post by shartos maximus
1 out of 27 quadrillion rolls =/= 0

i have a chance

next..


But for all intents and purposes, including statistics, 1 our of 27 quadrillion would just be rounded off as zero. It isn't impossible, but it's so unlikely it might as well be.
1620=2.735×1016\frac{1}{6}^{20}=2.735\times10^{-16}

12.735×1016=3.661015\frac{1}{2.735\times10^{-16}}=3.66*10^{15}

Or 1 in 3,660,000,000,000,000.

If you rolled those 20 dice every second, you would expect to get 20 sixes simultaneously once every 116 million years.

You're actually 261 million times more likely to win the UK lottery with one ticket than roll all sixes with 20 dice.

TL;DR you'll not roll 20 sixes in a row
you're saying it's impossible to get 20 6's in a row; i'm saying i can roll a dice 20 times and get 6 each time

which one of these statements is correct?
Original post by shartos maximus
you're saying it's impossible to get 20 6's in a row; i'm saying i can roll a dice 20 times and get 6 each time

which one of these statements is correct?


The second one. It's a lot more likely if they're loaded dice :tongue:
Original post by shartos maximus
you're saying it's impossible to get 20 6's in a row; i'm saying i can roll a dice 20 times and get 6 each time

which one of these statements is correct?


Both really. You're saying it could happen, which is true. I'm saying it will never happen, which is also true.
impossibru!
Reply 14
Had a little play around with probabilities, there's more chance of you becoming a pro athlete and then dating a millionaire supermodel and having a genius child and then living to 100. (1.921e^-16)

(As opposed to rolling 20 6s in a row, 2.735e^-16)
Original post by Ruthless Dutchman
Had a little play around with probabilities, there's more chance of you becoming a pro athlete and then dating a millionaire supermodel and having a genius child and then living to 100. (1.921e^-16)

(As opposed to rolling 20 6s in a row, 2.735e^-16)


That does make the assumption those are independent events when I'm pretty sure they wouldn't be, so in reality what you've said is far, far more likely! :biggrin:
Reply 16
Didn't you learn the ultimate rule in mathematics - what is it to 3 d.p? 0.0000000000000002735 = 0.00 = 0. Mathematical fact my friend
Original post by shinwave
Didn't you learn the ultimate rule in mathematics - what is it to 3 d.p? 0.0000000000000002735 = 0.00 = 0. Mathematical fact my friend
go tell that to an engineer designing a bridge

rounding a specific angle or length to 3 d.p. could cause the bridge to collapses onto a random guys face

since when is 0 more accurate than 0.0000000000000002735 anyway? get schooled, next.
rofl, wrote a program that randomly rolls a dice (generates a number 1-6) e-mails me whenever there's a stream of 20 6's. will legit pay for a server at some point and have the program running forever to prove to u nerds that it's possible
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by Scorlibran
1620=2.735×1016\frac{1}{6}^{20}=2.735\times10^{-16}

12.735×1016=3.661015\frac{1}{2.735\times10^{-16}}=3.66*10^{15}

Or 1 in 3,660,000,000,000,000.

If you rolled those 20 dice every second, you would expect to get 20 sixes simultaneously once every 116 million years.
true, but at the same time it's possible that i can get 20 6's simultaneously within 1 second and skip the 116 million year wait

Quick Reply

Latest