The Student Room Group

Are people who complain about champagne socialists stupid?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Bornblue
Yeah life was so much better when millions couldn't afford healthcare. Clown. No one can actually be this stupid.


You haven't really thought about this much really have you? In fact your ignorance is staggering.

Check out the health care systems elsewhere in the developed world and maybe we can have a serious discussion? Is that a deal?

Presently you aren't worth debating with further because you haven't got the first clue and your views are objectively worthless.
Original post by slg60
Yeah life peerages, calm down. Although, I do think that hereditary peerages should be brought back and peerages in general should be given out less (particularly to the royals). I think it is probably more to do with things beyond one's control which they support equality for, not whether you don't work hard enough to send your children to private school. The last two are utter garbage.

Just to be clear when you say the last 2 are utter garbage do you mean the people are garbage or the points I was making were garbage?
Original post by young_guns
That doesn't make any sense. Find me a single Guardian article that says that choosing to live in Bradford or Luton makes you racist.


I never said they said choosing to live in those places makes you racist. You misread what I wrote completely.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/22/this-isnt-feminism-its-islamophobia

Private school Oxbridge feminist who lives in Central London, tells people that concerns about Islam in Rochdale and other grooming areas are racist. No wonder the right is growing at an exponential rate. The point is that you can't live some airy fairy middle class lifestyle, and then write as the voice of the poor because you were in the Marxist society during your Cambridge days.

These sorts are no more in touch with the masses than David Cameron
(edited 9 years ago)
Reply 103
Original post by tengentoppa
Just to be clear when you say the last 2 are utter garbage do you mean the people are garbage or the points I was making were garbage?


Good one
Original post by young_guns
You said lots of wealthy lefties avoid tax. So are you saying more lefties avoid tax than other political persuasions?

Either way, you have no evidence for your proposition. It's just puerile speculation.



I come from a well-off family. Tbh I don't think you have a clue what people with money do.


Well tell us what they do then. I take it your family as Fabians supports higher taxation to help out the poor and support the welfare state?

Does your family therefore write a cheque at the end of every tax year to HMRC to support this aim in anticipation of the glorious day when taxes are raised?

If not why not? Didn't Sidney Webb your familial hero create the mantra "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs?"
Original post by young_guns
If the system which Toynbee advocated existed in Britain, I have no doubt that she would send her children to state schools. But given education is not yet sufficiently funded to the degree she feels is necessary for a good education, how is it wrong to send her children to be educated privately? Who does that harm? How is that inconsistent?


How would it be possible for the State to fund Schools to the same quality as the major Public Schools? I live near Eton, they have an endowment of over a quarter of a billion pounds, they charge over £34,000 per pupil per year and have playing fields of of over four hundred acres. Their rowing facility was used for the 2012 Olympics.

How is the local Comp in Slough EVER going to compete with that whatever the funding?

So that is a pretty convenient argument, transparently self serving. Wait until something that can never happen happens, let the proles and the immigrants go to the local comp in the meantime, they aren't good enough for OUR children. Might mix with riff raff.

No snob like a socialist snob, eh?
Original post by young_guns
The "tax wheeze", as you so delightfully called it, was not created by his parents. It was created by parliament


So were the tax regimes that allow Google and Starbucks, for example, to pay almost zero tax for their operations in the UK. No-one has said that they have failed to comply with the tax code created by parliament.

Do you also support the fact that those companies have paid so little tax or do you agree that they should pay more voluntarily? (As Starbucks has agreed to do?)

If you think big capitalist corporations should pay their share on moral grounds, why not rich champagne socialists like Ed Miliband?

Why is it OK or him to avoid tax and not them exactly?

It seems as though as long as you agree with socialism in principle you don't have to actually pay tax in practice. Is that your position?
Original post by young_guns
Left-wing socialists :lol: :dunce:

Are all left-wingers socialists? Are social democrats socialists? Are social democrats "allowed" to send their children to be privately educated?



Champagne socialist is a colloquial term used to describe left-leaning individuals who appear to partake in activity or opinion which deviates from their supposed belief systems. It stems from the inconsistencies between being rich and powerful and being politically leftward leaning, which simply don't exist on the right of politics.

As you find these concepts difficult, I will give you some examples; maybe then you can discard your distorted views based on the fact that from your own admission, you are a wealthy (probably posh and spoilt) child of champagne socialists.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3229453.stm - Diane Abbot (Former Labour Shadow Cabinet member) sending her son to private school after strongly criticising private schools and other politicians in her own party who sent their children to them. She's also a prominent racist to boot.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/emily-thornberry-snob-islington-labour-mp-ultimate-champagne-socialist-1475965 - Emily Thornberry, (Former Labour Shadow Attorney-General) who was forced to resign, after snobby opinions whilst canvassing Rochester constituency despite claiming to represent the working class. She lives nowhere near the working class of course, in posh Islington to be precise.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/10538643/Team-Miliband-spent-thousands-on-limousines-while-in-government.html - Ed Miliband (Weak, union funded leader of the Labour Party) - Ed Miliband spent thousands of pounds on luxury accommodation and limosines whilst part of the last labour government despite his whole appeal supposedly being based around being a man of people.
Original post by Swanbow
It depends how you use the phrase.

Just because someone is well off doesn't mean they can't hold left wing views, or be politically engaged for left wing causes. Saying that someone's sincerity is automatically invalid because of their background is wrong.

But then again I have met snobs who looked down on people with regional dialects, who labelled anyone who wasn't middle class as a 'chav' and who had some frighteningly backwards views. But they labelled themselves as left wing, and were politically engaged. I have no qualms calling these people 'champagne socialists'.


Overall there is a growing animosity towards the liberal intellectual elite. This stems from the left lurching towards the 'Third Way' and somewhat abandoning their traditional grass root members and electorate. I mean 19% of Labour candidates for the next General election were privately educated, up from 10% of current Labour MPs being privately educated. People are fed up with the lack of social mobility, elitism and classism in this country. We need a Parliament which more accurately reflects the make-up of this country.


True.
Hi,

would you mind replying to my Dissertation survey questions. I haven't had much luck so far.

You'd really be helping me out. I'd be happy to do one in return. Here is the link:


https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GX2ZXYL

Many Thanks

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending