The Student Room Group

US Presidential Election 2016 official thread

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Bornblue
Weird to think that in 2012 I was terrified of the prospect of Romney getting in, thinking he was a far right Nutjob.

Now I'd be glad to have him if it meant no trump.


Original post by Hydeman
You were clearly not that acquainted with the term far-right in 2012, then. :tongue: He was a moderate even by the Republican standards of the time -- he was running against people like Huckabee and Santorum.


It is just a typical symptom of many people with strong liberal tendencies. They can't even conceive that any ideology other than their own has any merit at all. So they actually believe that someone who severely differs is a "Nutjob". Conservatives tend to disagree with the opposition. Liberals tend to disdain the opposition.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Bornblue
Weird to think that in 2012 I was terrified of the prospect of Romney getting in, thinking he was a far right Nutjob.

Now I'd be glad to have him if it meant no trump.


Yes, it's odd how moderate and sensible Romney now seems in interviews.

He probably is relatively moderate actually, he ran to the right during his primaries to ensure he got selected. Arguably, Trump is doing the same thing, but he's so erratic, it's difficult to know what we will get once he actually has the nomination.
Original post by Hydeman
You were clearly not that acquainted with the term far-right in 2012, then. :tongue: He was a moderate even by the Republican standards of the time -- he was running against people like Huckabee and Santorum.


Yes and the current farce, er, well organised and sensible poll of right wing US opinion on who should be their candidate, Cruz = Huckabee and Rubio = Santorum.
I think trump will win the primaries for republicans.
If Hilary wins for democrats, welcome president trump.
If Bernie wins for democrats, welcome socialism.
Original post by ckingalt
It is just a typical symptom of many people with strong liberal tendencies. They can't even conceive that any ideology other than their own has any merit at all. So they actually believe that someone who severely differs is a "Nutjob". Conservatives tend to disagree with the opposition. Liberals tend to disdain the opposition.


In America at least I would say that both sides disdain each other. I mean at least from what I have gathered from my recent interest in the us elections (I assume the rhetoric calms down when the election finishes)

That could be though because of demographics though. There is seemingly less overlap between party identity than ever before.

http://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/congress-more-polarized/

http://www.gallup.com/poll/183386/social-ideology-left-catches-right.aspx
Original post by Midlander

4. I think zero chance is a bit far but he is clearly the outside candidate.
I owe you an apology!
Original post by Shipreck
I think trump will win the primaries for republicans.
If Hilary wins for democrats, welcome president trump.
If Bernie wins for democrats, welcome socialism.


Bernie sanders isn't a socialist, not by any definition of the word. In America the term socialist seems to have become like our version of facist (though they have that too). They just mean somebody on the left who they disagree with. Sanders has in no part endorsed government ownership of the means of products.

To quote him giving a speech at Georgetown university

I don’t believe government should take over the grocery store down the street or own the means of production.”

Bernie sanders
Original post by Fullofsurprises
Yes, it's odd how moderate and sensible Romney now seems in interviews.

He probably is relatively moderate actually, he ran to the right during his primaries to ensure he got selected. Arguably, Trump is doing the same thing, but he's so erratic, it's difficult to know what we will get once he actually has the nomination.


One of the biggest dangers of trump is making other republican candidates seem moderate or sensible.

Romneys speech destroying trump was brilliant, the best I've heard.
Original post by Hydeman
You were clearly not that acquainted with the term far-right in 2012, then. :tongue: He was a moderate even by the Republican standards of the time -- he was running against people like Huckabee and Santorum.


I guess I didn't take relativity into account back then. Even a moderate republican would be far to the right of the Tory party. Even the moderates seems to oppose abortion, gay marriage, universal healthcare, any sort of gun control etc etc.
Original post by garfeeled
In America at least I would say that both sides disdain each other. I mean at least from what I have gathered from my recent interest in the us elections (I assume the rhetoric calms down when the election finishes)

That could be though because of demographics though. There is seemingly less overlap between party identity than ever before.

http://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/congress-more-polarized/

http://www.gallup.com/poll/183386/social-ideology-left-catches-right.aspx


Amongst the candidates and talking heads that is certainly true. At least that is how it plays out with the campaigns and political process in general. Character attacks are not uncommon from both sides. I was referring to my interactions and observations with ideologues in general. The extremist right wing types certainly exude contempt of left wing ideas. However, the extremist left wing types seem to genuinely believe that conservatives are terrible people. That is Just my personal experience though.
Original post by Bornblue
I guess I didn't take relativity into account back then. Even a moderate republican would be far to the right of the Tory party. Even the moderates seems to oppose abortion, gay marriage, universal healthcare, any sort of gun control etc etc.


Opposition to an NHS-type system isn't exclusive to Republicans, though. Sanders is the only credible candidate in years to have proposed something of that kind.

You'd be surprised with some of the issues you've mentioned. W, for example, is often characterised as an evangelical loon, but he didn't exactly make overturning Roe v Wade his top priority when he came into office, although he was in favour of a constitutional amendment to define marriage unambiguously as the bond between one man and one woman.

With regards to gun control -- you should see what that Republican hero called Ronald Reagan had to say about that. :tongue:
Original post by ckingalt
It is just a typical symptom of many people with strong liberal tendencies. They can't even conceive that any ideology other than their own has any merit at all. So they actually believe that someone who severely differs is a "Nutjob". Conservatives tend to disagree with the opposition. Liberals tend to disdain the opposition.


Right. So calling Obama a "socialist and communist" and "the worst president in the history of United States" who is a "Jihadist enabling Muslim in disguise" is just disagreement then? Not disdain at all.

In fact, the Republican Congress' constant "compromises" with Obama is disdain.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by ckingalt
Amongst the candidates and talking heads that is certainly true. At least that is how it plays out with the campaigns and political process in general. Character attacks are not uncommon from both sides. I was referring to my interactions and observations with ideologues in general. The extremist right wing types certainly exude contempt of left wing ideas. However, the extremist left wing types seem to genuinely believe that conservatives are terrible people. That is Just my personal experience though.


Lol, it's the absolute reverse. :rolleyes:

Right wing Bible Belt and libertarian conservatives are absolutely obsessed with 'evil-painting' agendas. It isn't the Left who run hate radio stations that pour out 24/7 conspiracy theories, character attacks and deranged poison against right wing politicians, it's the other way around ffs.

There is no organised left wing hate of the right, but on the US right, it's a major industry with big funding and a large machine ready to crank up at a moment's notice.

The organisation of the Left-smearing hate machinery goes back to McCarthyism and the need for the predatory finance capital organisations to constantly deminish and harass the left and maintain their elite power and the servile, ignorant position of most US citizens. The true elites are not those constantly attacked by the Right, like the Clintons, but the people who sit in the big banks and investment companies and push working people around like pieces on a checker board.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by ckingalt
Amongst the candidates and talking heads that is certainly true. At least that is how it plays out with the campaigns and political process in general. Character attacks are not uncommon from both sides. I was referring to my interactions and observations with ideologues in general. The extremist right wing types certainly exude contempt of left wing ideas. However, the extremist left wing types seem to genuinely believe that conservatives are terrible people. That is Just my personal experience though.


I agree with you... but the right wing also seems to think liberals are just "young, stupid, naïve, thieving, lazy people who hate hard work, who are un-American and unpatriotic". Also, I hope I don't have to remind you what the Christian-right thinks of liberal minded atheists (or all atheists in general)...
Original post by chemting
Right. So calling Obama a "socialist and communist" and "the worst president in the history of United States" who is a "Jihadist enabling Muslim in disguise" is just disagreement then? Not disdain at all.

In fact, the Republican Congress' constant "compromises" with Obama is disdain.


Calling Obama a socialists, communist, or bad president are all forms of disagreement. Calling Bush a murderer, tyrant, and liar are attacks on morality. Here is another way of putting it. Conservatives think liberal policies are unfair and liberals think conservative beliefs are immoral.
Original post by garfeeled
Bernie sanders isn't a socialist, not by any definition of the word. In America the term socialist seems to have become like our version of facist (though they have that too). They just mean somebody on the left who they disagree with. Sanders has in no part endorsed government ownership of the means of products.

To quote him giving a speech at Georgetown university

I don’t believe government should take over the grocery store down the street or own the means of production.”

Bernie sanders

He calls himself a democratic socialist. So maybe I should have corrected it to, "Welcome democratic socialism."
Original post by Fullofsurprises
Lol, it's the absolute reverse. :rolleyes:

Right wing Bible Belt and libertarian conservatives are absolutely obsessed with 'evil-painting' agendas. It isn't the Left who run hate radio stations that pour out 24/7 conspiracy theories, character attacks and deranged poison against right wing politicians, it's the other way around ffs.

tbf, Rush Limbaugh probably has a listener base of about 10 people. And a lot of people just watch Alex Jones for the comedy. But yes, they are obsessed


Original post by Fullofsurprises
There is no organised left wing hate of the right, but on the US right, it's a major industry with big funding and a large machine ready to crank up at a moment's notice.

There is I'm afraid... and its increasing with neo-progressivism sjw agenda.
Original post by 098udf89dsf
I owe you an apology!


To be honest there was no way I could justifiably predict Bernie as the winner with not a single poll supporting it, but I felt dismissing him entirely would be unwise. Unless the polling samples all eligible demographics, not just past Democratic voters, they should be taken with a heavy pinch of salt.

Will be very interesting to see what impact the Michigan result has on next Tuesday, particularly the fellow mid-West states of Ohio and Illinois. Of the other states to come this month, I would expect Bernie to do very well in the Washington caucuses, and he is already polling ahead in the smaller states of Alaska and Idaho.
Original post by ckingalt
Calling Obama a socialists, communist, or bad president are all forms of disagreement. Calling Bush a murderer, tyrant, and liar are attacks on morality. Here is another way of putting it. Conservatives think liberal policies are unfair and liberals think conservative beliefs are immoral.


Unfortunately, it is not I who think Obama is committing a White, Christian genocide in America and enabling it worldwide. the Alt-right is way ahead of me.

https://stop-obama-now.net/white-genocide/

http://onenewsnow.com/persecution/2016/01/05/obama-blind-to-christian-genocide-says-columnist



http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/obamas_corrupt_and_immoral_abuse_of_the_military.html


http://conservativetribune.com/obama-immoral/

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/so_is_barack_obama_a_muslim_or_what.html

https://shadowproof.com/2008/06/13/shorter-peggy-noonan-obama-is-an-unpatriotic-effeminate-cynical-immoral-godless-opportunist/
Original post by ckingalt
Amongst the candidates and talking heads that is certainly true. At least that is how it plays out with the campaigns and political process in general. Character attacks are not uncommon from both sides. I was referring to my interactions and observations with ideologues in general. The extremist right wing types certainly exude contempt of left wing ideas. However, the extremist left wing types seem to genuinely believe that conservatives are terrible people. That is Just my personal experience though.


CNt argue against personal experience, just that in my own such attacks are true for both sides of the spectrum, the further from the centre the more intense they are

Original post by ckingalt
Calling Obama a socialists, communist, or bad president are all forms of disagreement. Calling Bush a murderer, tyrant, and liar are attacks on morality. Here is another way of putting it. Conservatives think liberal policies are unfair and liberals think conservative beliefs are immoral.


That being said aren't terms like socialist and communists used as insults in America. A bit like the term fascist, it's rarely used to describe somebody who supports policies that facism supports but used as a moral attack.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending