EDIT: hmm can't remember who this was a reply to, but the "quote" part is missing so this post sounds directionless, oh well.
---------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not directing anything personally towards you,but these are just my points:
"It will never work" is sort of an excuse because it's like saying "what's the point in having prisons? They'll always be some nutcase with an axe."But the thing is, it would be much worse without it.Left wing ideology only won't work because of the (corrupt) rich's grasp on the system.I couldn't believe it when the tories won the first time and second time this century....they never had this sort of power. We are used to the left and left centre (with parts of right wing) ideologies from the Blair era and so on. Things weren't that bad back then but it's hella worse now. Food banks, tuition fees, etc.
Why spend your life owning a business for example?Well you certainly will get a tonne more money than the guy playing video games 24/7. I think that's already enough of an incentive to push yourself.I'd rather have 100k a year than whatever sub-20k a year money the benefits give.I'm not saying you're totally wrong, becausethere needs to be businesses but a lot of them....we don't even need. (E.g. fast food.)There aren't as many scroungers as the government are making us believe. They keep making it look like an epidemic with the News (corrupt BTW) and the adverts "do you know someone claiming benefits fraudulently"demonising it like it's worse than what the banks do.It's just a distraction. Just like immigration.The unis for example were fine on 3k a year and nowthat they've got their hands on 9k....I don't think they're gonna let go that easily.
I disagree that capitalism is a beautiful thing because while I'm not sure of its effect in moderation, in huge excess (like these days)it's making the poor even poorer and the rich even richer. I don't see much difference between an annual 2 million and 4 million (in the sense that either will make me very happy and I'd be grateful either way) but the difference between 20k and 40k a year is a hell of a lot of money for an average person,20k is really low especially for a family but 40k you could be alright. The rich has to stop getting obsessed with getting more and more and more. They can't take that money to the grave and what they do pass on, they won't be alive to enjoy it, and instead let their children repeat history.
We should not leave any man behind. It's disgusting that some people have more money than 90% of the rest of the UK/world. Resources should be shared semi-equally at least. Based on work? Yeah maybe but equal opportunity is a lie and so the right wing is flawed as an ethical choice. The tories even wanna make things worse for the disabled...what the hell.
Actually I think I would be dead without our species thinking for each other. There have been many instances of that in my life and others.
If the (corrupt) rich who don't need to work another day in their life wanna leave, let them. They're having a tantrum because their obsession with money never dies. I say the UK would be better off without them. Even if it starts off badly, it will get way better because we won't have the filthy rich in control.I say tax the rich proportionally. It's not fair that a poor uni student and a millionaire have to pay X amount when the uni guy really needs it and the millionaire can wipe his bottom with it.We don't need the corrupt. A newer generation of left wing thinkers can just replace them.
There will be new scientists and bankers, etc. and such in this hypothetical situation that it will just feel like we're getting rid of "bad blood". Same function, better efficiency. I don't see the advantage of money trickling down to the poor when the poor can just get the rich peoples' jobs and start over cleanly.The civil second richest can just help.It's not like the filthy rich are sharing much to begin with so we can say goodbye to them without begging them back.It's only a dream because the filthy rich won't get off the throne.
They're not even circulating their money with us to a reasonable degree, what difference does it make if they leave?More good jobs for good people willing to share.Left wing ideology isn't ridiculous, nor is the idea of democracy. I'm sure that was laughed upon at some point too. But left wing ideologies aren't even a dream land idea of a madman. There are plenty of people who agree with it. The U.S. as a majority voted for the democrats for example. Change is definitely possible. If the morally bankrupt would just get the hell off the seat.
I understand your point and it seems you have left and right wing ideas you agree with but just giving up is not a step in progress. We are far away from equality but I think it used to be way worse in the past. To give up is letting the greedy win. If we can't stop, let's at least put a thorn in their side. (Joking.)
There's no point letting it go because left wing ideas can work. And it has at least to some localised degrees. Especially other countries in the EU.
I do of course agree people should work if they can but some just can't and some don't get the place because the rich guy next to him pulls strings. (Just an analogy.)