OCR A Level Psychology - Paper 1,2 and 3 (H567) - [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

I found the 15 marker a bit hard to operationalise so I had really lengthy 15 mark paragraphs but overall the exam was nice.

Reply 61

Woodall.

I feel like I did the reliability 6 marker so wrong. I said increases both internal and external
Internal because you ask the same rating scale question to each shopper
External because quantitative data from the scale
But they’re basically the same point
And the operationalise the dv in the 15 marker was horrible all I talked about was simply the number of items of litter left.

Reply 62

Woodall.

Also what did people put for why you rank data? In the section c bit above the 3 ranks of 17 question? I didn’t know what to put so just explained how to rank it instead

Reply 63

nikocado

Original post by Woodall.

Also what did people put for why you rank data? In the section c bit above the 3 ranks of 17 question? I didn’t know what to put so just explained how to rank it instead

yeah same we didnt get taught why its useful just how to do it. even my explanation was worded weirdly icl it was a weird q

Reply 64

Drphil123786

How are people revising for paper 2. My core studies were pretty much self taught and I can barely find any resources online

Reply 65

ibby-2626

Original post by Drphil123786

How are people revising for paper 2. My core studies were pretty much self taught and I can barely find any resources online

For me I've pretty much got all the core studies down, if you still need to learn them "Bethan dance" on YouTube has realy great videos for each of the core studies. But I feel as if section b, the debates is the hardest part so I'm just practicing structure and looking at examplers tbh

(edited 11 months ago)

Reply 66

ibby-2626

Original post by Woodall.

Also what did people put for why you rank data? In the section c bit above the 3 ranks of 17 question? I didn’t know what to put so just explained how to rank it instead

Idk If I done it right but I basically said you had to rank the data sets but because 17 had (16, 17,18) you add up those 3 ranks, divide them by 3 which gives you ,17 which is why it's 17

Reply 67

happycheese423

anyone got any predictions of paper 2

Reply 68

HashTag556

Original post by ibby-2626

Idk If I done it right but I basically said you had to rank the data sets but because 17 had (16, 17,18) you add up those 3 ranks, divide them by 3 which gives you ,17 which is why it's 17

Yea, I said something along the lines of that.

Reply 69

Woodall.

Also I’m now just realising it’s basically the exact same questions as the 2020 paper in terms of format n stuff , just different stats n criteria etc

Reply 70

xxxx754

One of the question was asking about mean and median, did it say why is the median better to use or the mean?

Reply 71

Woodall.

Original post by xxxx754

One of the question was asking about mean and median, did it say why is the median better to use or the mean?

Yeah : ) I just said because it only relies on 1 piece of data it’s not affect if the data is skewed and then talked about in the not wearing a badge condition there was a rlly high rating on like 17 or something ( i can’t remember the number) which would’ve skewed if the mean had been used