Stalin

They were as bad as each other to be honest

Hmmmm, I still feel that Hitler is more evil, from a purely subjective viewpoint. He intended to wipe out races and commit genocide. There was something chillingly calculated about his organised gas chambers in the extermination camps.

Then again, Stalin put huge numbers into Gulags which were essentially death camps. But it always seemed to me like a less clinical approach to murder than the Nazis and it seemed like Hitler had the ambition to kill far more people than Stalin did.

Then again, possibly I think Hitler was worse because I know more about the atrocities he commited. I only studied Stalin for a short while.

Well this is why I think they're as bad as each other, it's difficult to pin down levels of evil.

Perhaps a historian should make a list of "pros" and "cons" about dictators, rank their actions on an 'evil scale' of 1 to 10 (1 being 'is evil enough to not tip at restaurants where 10 is stamping on puppies and kittens kind of evil)

Then create a kind of league table to fully decide who is 'the daddy' of dictators...

...I think I got a bit too into that idea...

I'm a fan of him on facebook.

No need to be a gramma Nazi.

Anyway, I said 'badder' on purpose since later on I described my sentence sarcastically as an 'advanced summary'. The 'badder' was used to highlight that sarcasm.

That's about as funny as people wearing Che T-shirts thinking it makes them rebellious.