Roman Polanski

Maybe you should read my comment twice.


Samantha Geimer, the girl whom Polanski ALLEGEDLY raped at the age of 13 and who is now in her mid-40s, has called on the authorities to dismiss the charges against him.

Free Roman Polanski! I mean, his wife was killed when 9 months pregnant by the Charles Manson family, who wouldn't lose it after that? Besides, he's one of the best European directors.

And you all know he raped her how? She probably sued him because of the money, because no rape victim would ever call on the authorities to dismiss charges

I think the actual thing was a little less black and white than everyone's making it out to be. Its been 30 years, the guy is clearly not a paedophile, the alleged victim doesn't even give a **** anymore. Bringing this guy to "justice" would achieve absolutely nothing

Justice for the sake of justice is not enough for you?

What example does that set for other pedophiles and would be pedophiles?

Do you want justice for its own sake, or to 'set an example'? They are two different things.

I think the actual thing was a little less black and white than everyone's making it out to be. Its been 30 years, the guy is clearly not a paedophile, the alleged victim doesn't even give a **** anymore. Bringing this guy to "justice" would achieve absolutely nothing

Justice for the sake of justice is not enough for you?

What example does that set for other pedophiles and would be pedophiles?

Meh, really, meh. If you want to get het up and angry about this "issue" its your prerogative really, I I'd be hard pressed to care any less, you know?

Personally I'm gonna put it out there and say that this girl was probably one of the sorts who though young in years was mature enough to know what she was doing hanging out, taking pictures and doing drugs with an older big shot director in Paris.

I've seen the sort before.

And if it were your daughter?

You also bargain if you are quite certain you will lose. All evidence points at you even though you are innocent. For example, too much circumstantial evidence and a shaky alibi. A smart lawyer would suggest this to his/her client.

Guilt or innocent is determined by the jury/judge.

Guilty verdict will always mean a harsher sentence.

I wouldn't let my daughter hang out with older men in the first place, wasn't it the girl's mother who introduced the two?

Anyway, fact of the matter is, it ain't my daughter, the girl in question is now old enough to be my mother and as far as we're all aware hasn't suffered any damage and doesn't care any more.

Heck, I'd say she even made quite a pretty penny offa this whole thing, which kinda makes you think whether it was really rape at all. Who is to say, she didn't know exactly what she was doing when she started spending time with this man, regardless of what the law says, who is to say she didn't genuinely give her consent to knock boots with the guy.

Then when her and her mother narc'd on him when they figured how much $$$$ they could make off of the story.



I don't think she looks like a gal whose life has been ravaged by rape. She's been peddling the story every since it happened, get real a little.

Meh, really, meh. If you want to get het up and angry about this "issue" its your prerogative really, I I'd be hard pressed to care any less, you know?

Personally I'm gonna put it out there and say that this girl was probably one of the sorts who though young in years was mature enough to know what she was doing hanging out, taking pictures and doing drugs with an older big shot director in Paris.

I've seen the sort before.