Hello,
I have a conditional offer for MSc in Empires, Colonialism and Globalization at LSE and for MA in International Relations at KCL. I would like to continue for the PhD.
Which one should i choose?
The subject at LSE is extremely interesting for me and it is the area that I would desperately love to study. I also think that LSE is a better uni. However, MSc in ECG is at the Department of International History and I will have to write a dissertation in the field of History with the substantial use of primary sources. I have a double BA in Political science and International relations from insignificant university. I am not acquainted with History, how Historians think, what concepts they use or with the use of primary sources, how to critically assess them and I do not know how challenging this programme can be. Since English is my second language I will have to struggle with it during the stressful 3 hour examinations and given the unfamiliarity with history I will be overkilled by robots with their bachelors in history from Oxford or from somewhere else. I would not like to fail and lose 20K, since I do not have a rich background. I speak just English and my mother tongue which would make studying history from primary sources also a little bit harder.
I heard that KCL gives more emphasis on written works and less on unseen examinations, which would suit me better, but I do not know if it is true. It is also the same field as my bachelor so I would be more familiar with it. It is also probably a better degree in terms of employability because it is directly MA in International Relations. However, I still consider KCL as less prestigious than LSE and I have heard from a current friend studying at KCL that he is disappointed, lecturers are uninterested and that the programme is not challenging. I am also not sure whether I can even go to KCL, because I have a conditional offer to have an overall mark 1,3, but I have 1,31 and I have no more courses to amend my GPA.
Please help!