The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

I guess ill just have to do a biased report then :frown:. I hate you guys! :smile:
But how can i swing the readers opinion to support my view? Should I write about what they do: the hardest part of their job compared to a footballers? their hours compared to a footballers?
Okay. I officially have no argument! I hate you guys! :smile:
I guess ill have to do a biased review then. So would i compare the two peoples lives then: for example how many hours a doctor has to do compared to a footballer and the hardest thing a doctor has to do etc - to swing the examiners view in my favour??
Reply 22
It's just how it is. It's not all about the money, anyway.
Original post by Moiraclaire
The laws of supply and demand.

There is a higher supply of doctors than good footballers, also greater demand for good footballers than doctors.

TOTALLY UNJUST :L footballers are unproductive and normally mentally subnormal - they make lots of little boys spend way too much time playing football when they should be focusing on their education - this makes me very angry.




Football is a multi billion pound industry because demand to watch football is high, demand for footballers is derived from the demand to watch footballers.

Footballers rationally choose the highest wage - nothing to do with 'sharing'.

DOCTORS - relatively high supply as thousands of medics graduate every year, relatively low demand as we need thousands of doctors to work in our hospital

a lovely basic economics lesson for all :L


There is a higher supply of doctors than footballers? Can be argued the opposite....look at how many leagues there are in every country...there are hundreds of thousands of footballers. A large factor in the pay of doctors is the fact that the government CANNOT afford to pay £150,000 a week to a doctor. Demand for doctors is ridiculously high, there is not a single moment when they aren't in need. Obviously supply and demand play some part, but you must be delusional if you think that the lower pay of doctors is nothing to do with the fact that the government has a tight budget. Why do you think private doctors can earn £1million a year? Surely demand for them is less than demand for public sector doctors?

I understand your point that demand for premier league football is high ---> wages are high, this is of course true. However it is also due to the fact that the government do not sufficient resources to actually sustain a £150k/week salary for doctors.

Congratulations on your UCL offer though :wink:...mind if i pm you..?
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 24
Original post by Extricated
There is a higher supply of doctors than footballers? Can be argued the opposite....look at how many leagues there are in every country...there are hundreds of thousands of footballers. A large factor in the pay of doctors is the fact that the government CANNOT afford to pay £150,000 a week to a doctor. Demand for doctors is ridiculously high, there is not a single moment when they aren't in need. Obviously supply and demand play some part, but you must be delusional if you think that the lower pay of doctors is nothing to do with the fact that the government has a tight budget. Why do you think private doctors can earn £1million a year? Surely demand for them is less than demand for public sector doctors?

I understand your point that demand for premier league football is high ---> wages are high, this is of course true. However it is also due to the fact that the government do not sufficient resources to actually sustain a £150k/week salary for doctors.


You think there aren't hundreds of thousands of doctors?

There are many, many more doctors than there are professional level footballers.
Original post by cambo211
You think there aren't hundreds of thousands of doctors?

There are many, many more doctors than there are professional level footballers.


Obviously there are. I was disputing the fact that he claimed that it was "nothing to do" with the fact that the government has a limited budget. I think my original post of "LOL at demand and supply" may have been a little exaggerated.
Reply 26
Original post by Extricated
Obviously there are. I was disputing the fact that he claimed that it was "nothing to do" with the fact that the government has a limited budget. I think my original post of "LOL at demand and supply" may have been a little exaggerated.


If the government suddenly found a truckload of money they wouldn't boost the wages of doctors they'd put it into improved facilities/more doctors.

Why would they pay the doctors more when the doctors have very little choice of where to work? CR summed it all up pretty well on the first page.
Original post by cambo211
If the government suddenly found a truckload of money they wouldn't boost the wages of doctors they'd put it into improved facilities/more doctors.

Why would they pay the doctors more when the doctors have very little choice of where to work? CR summed it all up pretty well on the first page.


Train drivers have very little choice...yet their pay has increased exponentially over the last 10 years. 50k a year is quite common
Original post by Moiraclaire
TOTALLY UNJUST :L footballers are unproductive and normally mentally subnormal - they make lots of little boys spend way too much time playing football when they should be focusing on their education - this makes me very angry.


Why "should" they be focusing on their education rather than football?
In my opinion, they "should" be focusing on whatever is going to bring them happiness and success in life.
Original post by Ayesha.Tabassam95
Hi. Im doing an my discursive essay on the above for english. Anyone have any ideas?? I would really appreciate it :smile:


Why Bill Gates is a billionaire and founders of unix are not?

High demand generates larger revenues.
It is supply and demand, there is massively more demand for footballers (at the top level) that is facilitated by TV. People only want a doctor when they are ill, they won't subscribe to Sky Sports to get access to watch doctors at work, they won't pay money to watch doctors live in action. Footballers' salaries are so high because the TV companies pay enormous sums of money to get the rights to televise games, because they get huge audiences (high demand) and can sell advertising at expensive prices to advertiser because of those audiences. Also wealthy club owners compete against each other to try to sign the best players so they bid each other up for the talent.

With doctors it is a totally different environment, there isn't enough interest in what they do to sell TV rights or do endorsements for clothing and leisurewear, they aren't celebrities.
Reply 31
because the UK is a football obsessed country where players are being portrayed as some sort of gods.
Original post by Extricated
There is a higher supply of doctors than footballers? Can be argued the opposite....look at how many leagues there are in every country...there are hundreds of thousands of footballers.


Most of those footballers have don't have super high salaries though. In the lower leagues in England, average salaries are as low as around £50k. In other countries, it's much lower than that. The top leagues represent a tiny minority of footballers.

There is a low supply of footballers who are good enough to play for the top teams that have lots of money to give them. If Messi or Ronaldo quit their jobs, their clubs would have a very tough time replacing them. They wouldn't be able to just pick any footballer out of the hundreds of thousands you mentioned.
Whereas if I have an ordinary illness that I need to see my GP for, probably, any GP will do. Or if I need to see an orthopaedic consultant, any orthopaedic consultant will probably do. With doctors, there's a lot less need for "that doctor in particular".

It is also due to the fact that the government has no money and couldn't possibly afford to pay doctors that much anyway, but supply and demand plays its part as well.
Original post by tazarooni89
Most of those footballers have don't have super high salaries though. In the lower leagues in England, average salaries are as low as around £50k. In other countries, it's much lower than that. The top leagues represent a tiny minority of footballers.

There is a low supply of footballers who are good enough to play for the top teams that have lots of money to give them. If Messi or Ronaldo quit their jobs, their clubs would have a very tough time replacing them. They wouldn't be able to just pick any footballer out of the hundreds of thousands you mentioned.
Whereas if I have an ordinary illness that I need to see my GP for, probably, any GP will do. Or if I need to see an orthopaedic consultant, any orthopaedic consultant will probably do. With doctors, there's a lot less need for "that doctor in particular".

It is also due to the fact that the government has no money and couldn't possibly afford to pay doctors that much anyway, but supply and demand plays its part as well.


Yeah, I understand that supply and demand obviously plays its part. If you refer to my 3 previous posts, I've mentioned that about ~6 times :tongue:
Original post by Extricated
Yeah, I understand that supply and demand obviously plays its part. If you refer to my 3 previous posts, I've mentioned that about ~6 times :tongue:


Sorry :colondollar:
Original post by Moiraclaire
The laws of supply and demand.

There is a higher supply of doctors than good footballers, also greater demand for good footballers than doctors.

TOTALLY UNJUST :L footballers are unproductive and normally mentally subnormal - they make lots of little boys spend way too much time playing football when they should be focusing on their education - this makes me very angry.




Football is a multi billion pound industry because demand to watch football is high, demand for footballers is derived from the demand to watch footballers.

Footballers rationally choose the highest wage - nothing to do with 'sharing'.

DOCTORS - relatively high supply as thousands of medics graduate every year, relatively low demand as we need thousands of doctors to work in our hospital

a lovely basic economics lesson for all :L


Demand to watch football was also proportionately high, relative to population size, 20 years ago yet football wages at that time were only a small percentage of what they are now. It's not that demand has exponentially increased over the last 20 years, it's the commercialisation of football itself as an industry and inflation of the economy that has lead to extremely high wages.
Original post by Extricated
There is a higher supply of doctors than footballers? Can be argued the opposite....look at how many leagues there are in every country...there are hundreds of thousands of footballers. A large factor in the pay of doctors is the fact that the government CANNOT afford to pay £150,000 a week to a doctor. Demand for doctors is ridiculously high, there is not a single moment when they aren't in need. Obviously supply and demand play some part, but you must be delusional if you think that the lower pay of doctors is nothing to do with the fact that the government has a tight budget. Why do you think private doctors can earn £1million a year? Surely demand for them is less than demand for public sector doctors?

I understand your point that demand for premier league football is high ---> wages are high, this is of course true. However it is also due to the fact that the government do not sufficient resources to actually sustain a £150k/week salary for doctors.

Congratulations on your UCL offer though :wink:...mind if i pm you..?




Yes but in terms of REALLY REALLY good footballers there is low supply.
Yes government has a tight budget,

but the wage is still determined by supply and demand if the wage was £20,000, fewer qualified medics would be willing and able to supply there labour in terms of being a doctor (they might go private sector or abroad or become a surgeon etc) when the wage is £150,000 we ahve enough doctors who are willing and able to supply their labour as we need to deal with our country's various ailments....

If the wage was £150,000 per week, we would have too many doctors willing and able to supply their labour, so in order to for the market to reach equillibrium, and only enough doctors be willing and able to supply their labour as we need, government can cut the salary down to £150,000 per year.

DESPITE NEEDING TO MAKE CUTS - we would never cut teacher's salaries to £5,000 per year - be cause we wouldn't have enough teachers - same basic principle....

and yes of course you can pm me :smile:

SO HAPPY with UCL :smile: Just waiting on Warwick (Tick, tock)
It is just supply and demand. Although people who havent studied economics may neg me for saying this, a top footballer is more valuable to society than a doctor and that is why they are paid more.
Original post by Mr Dangermouse
Wrong. If the NHS was privatised you wouldn't see doctors on £200000 per week.


You get what, maybe 10 players earning that? 200k a week is roughly 10 mil a year. So yes, I reckon you would see that.

Of course you would also get lots of doctors earning much much less than that. And less than they get now.

Original post by Ayesha.Tabassam95
Fair enough but then how come even the rubbish players get paid more -well in most cases?


Simple answer, they don't. In the top division, the average is 22k per week (this is bought up massively by the 100k+ earners). In the championship (second tier) it is 4k per week. In the 4th tier of English football it is a little over £700 per week. Barely more than the national average. Below this 4th tier, there are another 19 leagues of semi-professional and professional clubs.

So for every player earning 100k (trust me, there are a lot less than you think), there are hundreds earning barely more than the national average wage. When you factor in an average career length of 10-15 years, not exactly brilliant.

Original post by Moiraclaire
The laws of supply and demand.

There is a higher supply of doctors than good footballers, also greater demand for good footballers than doctors.

TOTALLY UNJUST :L footballers are unproductive and normally mentally subnormal - they make lots of little boys spend way too much time playing football when they should be focusing on their education - this makes me very angry.




Football is a multi billion pound industry because demand to watch football is high, demand for footballers is derived from the demand to watch footballers.

Footballers rationally choose the highest wage - nothing to do with 'sharing'.

DOCTORS - relatively high supply as thousands of medics graduate every year, relatively low demand as we need thousands of doctors to work in our hospital

a lovely basic economics lesson for all :L


Just no.

Demand now is no higher than it was 30 years ago. Football has just become more commercialised. Seriously apart from the Premier League, you do not get many players earning more than doctors. The average in the the 2nd tier is a little over 200k per year. Not exactly astronomically more than Consultants in this country. Considering a player's career lasts 10-15 years, it isn't exactly a fantastic deal.

If the NHS was privatised, I reckon we would see a similar model. An elite of doctors raking in millions per year, with some doctors right at the bottom of the tree earning less than what they would expect to earn now. The system that the government places simply ensures that all doctors get paid roughly equal amounts. This has much more to do with private/state than supply/demand.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by Sternumator
It is just supply and demand. Although people who havent studied economics may neg me for saying this, a top footballer is more valuable to society than a doctor and that is why they are paid more.


Read my above post. if the medical system were privatised, and there were little change in the supply of doctors, you would see some doctors pulling in millions with other earning pittances in comparison (just like in the US).

This has very little to do with supply/demand. The government could cut the number of places at medical schools and wages would change very little. If the government privatises the NHS, wages will change a lot.

Latest

Trending

Trending