Geiger Muller Tube

Physics and electronics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera 21-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. ilovemath's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 730
    Geiger Muller Tube
    can Gieger muller tubes only be used RELIABLY to dected neutral particles?
    charged particles will immidiatley move towards the electrodes and produce a pulse of electricity hence making results unreliable if they ionise a particle on their way as well!!

    Also what would happen if the same source of ionising radiation ionised two particles - won't this be detected as two particles by the GM tube even though ONLY 1 is present?
  2. Cora Lindsay's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 924
    Re: Geiger Muller Tube
    (Original post by ilovemath)
    can Gieger muller tubes only be used RELIABLY to dected neutral particles?
    charged particles will immidiatley move towards the electrodes and produce a pulse of electricity hence making results unreliable if they ionise a particle on their way as well!!

    Also what would happen if the same source of ionising radiation ionised two particles - won't this be detected as two particles by the GM tube even though ONLY 1 is present?
    No, because the voltage in the GM tube is high enough for the charged species produced in the initial ionisation event to gain enough energy that they cause secondary ionisations, and the charged species produced in this way also migrate to the electrode. So an ionisation event triggers an 'avalanche' and a GM tube gives a signal which is not proportional to the energy dissipated.
  3. ilovemath's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 730
    Re: Geiger Muller Tube
    (Original post by Cora Lindsay)
    No, because the voltage in the GM tube is high enough for the charged species produced in the initial ionisation event to gain enough energy that they cause secondary ionisations, and the charged species produced in this way also migrate to the electrode. So an ionisation event triggers an 'avalanche' and a GM tube gives a signal which is not proportional to the energy dissipated.
    so does the tube measure the number of pulses of current (i.e: avalanches) and we say that equals (approx) the number of ionising particles of radiation?
  4. Cora Lindsay's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 924
    Re: Geiger Muller Tube
    (Original post by ilovemath)
    so does the tube measure the number of pulses of current (i.e: avalanches) and we say that equals (approx) the number of ionising particles of radiation?
    That's pretty much it- the more pulses, the more intense the radiation.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.