Official Cambridge Applicants Thread 2016 Entry

Ofc but how can we PROVE that maths is the best. Maybe induction would suffice.

Proof by induction:

Maths is better than biology of course. The proof is trivial so I'll leave that for the reader. and we know that biology is THE LOWEST subject.

Now if maths is better than subject x then since maths is maths it is also better than subject x+1. So our proof is complete. QED.

Let us assume maths is not better then the set of n subjects where n is all positive real subjects. Hence by Pythagoras no such think exists, therefore by contradiction going against the laws of water mathematics is the best.
I'm trying my best to stay sane before the Cambridge decision comes through.


Posted from TSR Mobile

so take chemistry as x. if maths is better than subject chemistry then since maths is maths it is also better than subject chemistry+1. which unfortunately isnt a subject therefore this doesnt prove anything other than its better than subject x, which can only b the subject u choose x to be.

Lol'd at "the laws of water".
Was that a typo?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Lol chemistry+1 is obviously physics. Cmon EVERYONE knows that.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Lol chemistry+1 is obviously physics. Cmon EVERYONE knows that.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Lol'd at "the laws of water".
Was that a typo?

Posted from TSR Mobile

If I want to do a Science-related degree or Medicine and at AS I get AAAB with the B being in French, would I still be okay if I apply to Cambridge (or Oxford). At GCSE I got 9A*s 2As 1B.

Water law is the field of law dealing with the ownership, control, and use of water as a resource. It is most closely related to property law, but has also become influenced by environmental law. Because water is vital to living things and to a variety of economic activities, laws attempting to govern it have far-reaching effects.

look without maths physics wouldn't work. Chemistry is basically just particle physics so maths again, lastly biology is just like mitosis so like its like chips and beans with gravy. Hence maths is better again. QED


Posted from TSR Mobile

Without water, lucozade wouldn't exist so Yh.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Yh ur gcse are more then ok


Posted from TSR Mobile

Your completely right and I think people stress about it because the candidates are now being seen as a person and there are certain things like making a mathematical mistake that they think they'll be penalised for whereas on their UCAS application all the content is revised over and over so their is no room for error.

Were the people who found it easy all applying for NatSci too?

Are you applying?

If I want to do a Science-related degree or Medicine and at AS I get AAAB with the B being in French, would I still be okay if I apply to Cambridge (or Oxford). At GCSE I got 9A*s 2As 1B.

How is particle physics maths? mitosis has no link with chips and beans with gravy. But then if there was no maths then physics would b different to what we know physics to be. Ur assuming that no subject would change if maths wasnt there

Yep

Applying?

You haven't sat them, so don't contemplate. Just get the A in French it's super easy.

But yeah, should be if you had 3 good As in the others for Cambridge.

Can't tell if serious?



Posted from TSR Mobile

Im serious. Without maths being there, it doesnt mean that nothing would make sense or wteva cuz maybe sumthing that we cant think of could take it place.