Vile left wing socialists mock the death of boy

Reminder that the mezzil once argued that the people of India deserved to be killed and enslaved by the British Empire because they were 'selfishly hogging their resources' and should have just shared them with us to begin with.

To be fair, I don't think he was suggesting forced termination á la Nazi Germany.

remember how the Tsar's children were murdered by the socialists ? nothing changes.

I didn't see that - I'm not surprised though.

Yeah his reasoning was that because land belongs to everyone the British were totally justified in sending an army in to kill and enslave the population and then taking it by force because they should have just given it to them anyway. Those priceless mezzil moments eh?

Yeah his reasoning was that because land belongs to everyone the British were totally justified in sending an army in to kill and enslave the population and then taking it by force because they should have just given it to them anyway. Those priceless mezzil moments eh?

Yeah his reasoning was that because land belongs to everyone the British were totally justified in sending an army in to kill and enslave the population and then taking it by force because they should have just given it to them anyway. Those priceless mezzil moments eh?

I'm not the one suggesting to save the polar bears in order to eat rich kids.

Socialist worker = socialist party.

Well that's a blatant lie.

Right? So because I said "yourself" you think I'm a retard?

You do realise I don't try or intend to have scholarly political debates that I have at University? I write on TSR in very simple terms. As I said, you know nothing about my "political acumen".

Many people on TSR are scumbags. I treat them as such.

I was referring to the paper. Those in argument with me clearly support this, even if they have not explicitly said so. Defending the socialists and thus the socialist paper is defending the comments in the paper itself.

If this was someone like Farage talking about a socialist kid, you would all be up in arms. How come you aren't? Because you are bigots. Simple.

I was referring to the paper. Those in argument with me clearly support this, even if they have not explicitly said so. Defending the socialists and thus the socialist paper is defending the comments in the paper itself.

If this was someone like Farage talking about a socialist kid, you would all be up in arms. How come you aren't? Because you are bigots. Simple.

<br>
<br>
I still don't understand. I am not an estate agent, and if a use "overly sophisticated" words, it does not mean I am a retard. <br><br>Nobody has picked on any holes though? The Socialist paper has wrote some outrageous comments. True or not? Therefore, as this is the mouth of the Socialist party, it shows how extreme and vile they really are. True?<br><br>I'm not confused by your argument, I just don't agree with you. Problem?

The Socialist paper has wrote some outrageous comments. True or not? Therefore, as this is the mouth of the Socialist party, it shows how extreme and vile they really are. True?

Mezzil is just sad because he saw a dead dog on the street and therefore reached the logical conclusion that all dogs were dead. That kid just loves dogs.

To be honest I don't really care that much what he thinks - I just think that if you are going to complain when people generalise about UKIP, you can't generalise about socialism.