The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by MJK91
I wouldn't say that's the case. If you do an accredited course and get your portfolio done, you can earn anything up to £40k within ten years. That's roughly equivalent to what you'd be on after the same time doing GEM. There is room for further earnings depending on what you do exactly as a career. You could lecture part time, or move into research, or work in the pharmaceutical industry.

Being a BMS doesn't mean you have to spend your entire life in a crap job in a dark lab room. There are loads of jobs you can move into.

Finally, you kind of made my point. Whilst future earnings is an important part of a career choice, I'd argue enjoyment and quality of life are more important. Working in research can be great; stressful at times but also quite laid back at other times. If financial incentive is your primary motive for studying graduate-entry medicine I'd suggest you'd be better of doing something legal or financial.


For me when i decide a career two factors come into play: the money and the job itself

If I went into banking/consulting/legal/financial then the money is good, but the job itself isn't satisfying

Medicine on the other hand the pay is decent (less than the above but still good) but the job satisfaction is immense and outweighs the salary consideration. In other words I'd happily earn less money if I loved my job

With biomed I'm not interested in working in a lab or anything to do with a biomed career path and the salary isn't good. I had a look at NHS banding for biomed scientists and it's nowhere near that of a consultant doctor or even speciality doctors who can go and locum. Which kinda brings me back to my original point - if I did biomed and didn't get into GEM then it's been a complete waste
Original post by katy456
Or do something in the medical profession?


My mum is a biomedical scientist with the NHS, although she also trains staff about... well, how not to kill people. So a BMS degree could get you a pretty varied job in the medical profession.
Original post by Brownclown
For me when i decide a career two factors come into play: the money and the job itself
If I went into banking/consulting/legal/financial then the money is good, but the job itself isn't satisfying
Medicine on the other hand the pay is decent (less than the above but still good) but the job satisfaction is immense and outweighs the salary consideration. In other words I'd happily earn less money if I loved my job
With biomed I'm not interested in working in a lab or anything to do with a biomed career path and the salary isn't good. I had a look at NHS banding for biomed scientists and it's nowhere near that of a consultant doctor or even speciality doctors who can go and locum. Which kinda brings me back to my original point - if I did biomed and didn't get into GEM then it's been a complete waste


I know several BMS/clinical scientists who earn above 70k pa. It is doable, and I wouldn't say it was more difficult than becoming a consultant or less difficult. Both require very dedicated lifestyles but in different ways. As I mentioned above you can also head into pharmaceutical research, where the money can potentially be a lot better.

You say you wouldn't enjoy biological research but that's also quite a large part of being a doctor further down the line in your career. Not so much as a junior doctor (though you could do some academic work), but certainly as a specialist trainee and a consultant you will be engaged in clinical and non-clinical research.
Original post by MJK91
I know several BMS/clinical scientists who earn above 70k pa. It is doable, and I wouldn't say it was more difficult than becoming a consultant or less difficult. Both require very dedicated lifestyles but in different ways. As I mentioned above you can also head into pharmaceutical research, where the money can potentially be a lot better.

You say you wouldn't enjoy biological research but that's also quite a large part of being a doctor further down the line in your career. Not so much as a junior doctor (though you could do some academic work), but certainly as a specialist trainee and a consultant you will be engaged in clinical and non-clinical research.


I've had a look at the pharmaceutical industry and all the big money is over in America. Also to get to any sort of top level research in a pharmaceutical industry will entail doing a masters and a PhD probably. Put simply all of my twenties will be spent at uni racking up debt

I don't mind research but working in a lab for the rest of my life just isn't appealing to me

Also isn't BSM highly oversubscribed with the nhs STP being really difficult to get a place on?
Original post by Brownclown
I've had a look at the pharmaceutical industry and all the big money is over in America.


I'm sure AstraZenica and GSK would like to have a word with you. There are dozens of smaller companies which pay well in the pharmaceutical industry. Wouldn't rule it out!

Also to get to any sort of top level research in a pharmaceutical industry will entail doing a masters and a PhD probably. Put simply all of my twenties will be spent at uni racking up debt


If you want to be a consultant, you'll have to do a research degree on top of medical school at some stage. Normally after CT/ST1. Have a look at the path to becoming a consultant for different specialities, you can find person specifications online.

I don't mind research but working in a lab for the rest of my life just isn't appealing to me


Fair enough, I wouldn't do BMS then. That was the point of my original post :P

Also isn't BSM highly oversubscribed with the nhs STP being really difficult to get a place on?


Yes it's competitive, but no more so than going for specialist posts in a lot of popular medical specialities. You will face competition regardless of your career and very few people reach the top of their fields without significant hard work and competition.

The STP runs yearly, you gain experience and try and get in. If you don't you get more experience and reapply. You're not exactly jobless whilst that process goes on.
Original post by MJK91
I'm sure AstraZenica and GSK would like to have a word with you. There are dozens of smaller companies which pay well in the pharmaceutical industry. Wouldn't rule it out!



If you want to be a consultant, you'll have to do a research degree on top of medical school at some stage. Normally after CT/ST1. Have a look at the path to becoming a consultant for different specialities, you can find person specifications online.



Fair enough, I wouldn't do BMS then. That was the point of my original post :P



Yes it's competitive, but no more so than going for specialist posts in a lot of popular medical specialities. You will face competition regardless of your career and very few people reach the top of their fields without significant hard work and competition.

The STP runs yearly, you gain experience and try and get in. If you don't you get more experience and reapply. You're not exactly jobless whilst that process goes on.


One problem with pharma companies is the organic chemistry which is involved - that's what ruined me in my A2 and will stop me achieving my grade offer for medicine

I'd do a fellowship to continue into consultancy e.g clinical dermatology fellowship

You're not jobless no, but you aren't paid much though. You might not have realised but I'm money orientated (Or career orientated if I become a doctor)
Original post by Brownclown
I'd do a fellowship to continue into consultancy e.g clinical dermatology fellowship


That's even more competitive than the standard route! The BSMD awards 2 fellowships per year.
Original post by OU#50
You wont get any funding for any second undergraduate degree (apart from a maintenance loan). You could consider applying to join the armed forces. They have a bursary scheme that would pay a lump sum each year after year 2 (about 10 grand I think) then a lump sum of approx 45 grand when you finish your army medic training) You would join as an officer and have to spend 8 years in the army, Not bad pay - good experience and an army pension!! Might be worth looking into


Not true. If you do gem you get c£5,500 of your fess each year as a loan from slc. The remaining £3,500 you have to self fund in the first year but it's covered by the NHS thereafter. You also get full maintenance loan (but no grant) from slc in 1st year, about half every year thereafter, and the NHS bursary is a minimum of £1,000 pa from 2nd year onwards, plus a further amount which is means tested.

So it's by no means fully funded, but there is some help.

This does only apply to the 4 year courses though, so imperial's gem course is now treated as a normal 5 yr with minimal funding :frown:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by MJK91
I know several BMS/clinical scientists who earn above 70k pa. It is doable, and I wouldn't say it was more difficult than becoming a consultant or less difficult. Both require very dedicated lifestyles but in different ways. As I mentioned above you can also head into pharmaceutical research, where the money can potentially be a lot better.

You say you wouldn't enjoy biological research but that's also quite a large part of being a doctor further down the line in your career. Not so much as a junior doctor (though you could do some academic work), but certainly as a specialist trainee and a consultant you will be engaged in clinical and non-clinical research.


You know a few BMS who earn over 70K? That's crazy. I thought band 8b was the highest you could go in BMS which is about 57k? Do you know what disciplines they are in out of curiosity?
Original post by CharlotteF1993
what are the differences between a biomedical scientist and a clinical scientist and what routes do you do to get from being a biomedical scientist to a clinical scientist? I ask as I am studying a biomedical science degree.


It sort of depends on what discipline you want to go into. In certain areas eg physiology, genetics, genomics you don't have biomedical scientists working at the equivalent level so the clinical scientist does the lab analysis as well as the validation and reporting of the results.
In Biochemistry a biomedical scientist is usually the one who does the analysis and validation of the result and the clinical scientist reports the result to the doctor who also can provide clinical information on the result as well.

For example a biomedical scientist would run a sample for PSA and then also validate the result as long as they were confident the assay was successful - If the PSA was above the reference range or a result of clinical significance then the clinical scientist would report the result to the clinician informing them that the PSA result indicates that either the cancer therapy isn't working or that perhaps rather than total PSA, with the doctors say-so the lab should run a free vs total PSA ratio to rule out BPH over cancer.
But this line blurs quite a lot depending on discipline and actually biomeds can report certain results. Both jobs have teaching and research components as well as progression to lab manager or Director of Operations for BMS /consultant clinical scientist roles

To register as a biomedical scientist you need to complete an IBMS accredited degree and get your certificate of competence but to register at the clinical scientist level you need to complete the post grad NHS STP in a chosen specialty
Original post by Bagsworth
You know a few BMS who earn over 70K? That's crazy. I thought band 8b was the highest you could go in BMS which is about 57k? Do you know what disciplines they are in out of curiosity?


Micro, with private work additional to 8a salaries.
Original post by MJK91
Micro, with private work additional to 8a salaries.


What sort of private work? I know biomeds can go up to 8c and perhaps further if they ever roll out consultant biomedical scientist roles as well. I personally think its a good career but others notsomuch.
Original post by MJK91
Micro, with private work additional to 8a salaries.


Original post by Bagsworth
What sort of private work? I know biomeds can go up to 8c and perhaps further if they ever roll out consultant biomedical scientist roles as well. I personally think its a good career but others notsomuch.


I think it's pretty rare for biomedical scientists to go beyond band 7, but I could be wrong. A high level clinical scientist, on the other hand, could get band 8-9 pay.
Original post by Asklepios
I think it's pretty rare for biomedical scientists to go beyond band 7, but I could be wrong. A high level clinical scientist, on the other hand, could get band 8-9 pay.


Chief BMS can get band 8a and from there you can become lab manager or director of operations on band 8b/c. More managerial but you need exp in BMS. Consultant clinical scientists can get band 9 but they are rare positions.

Latest

Trending

Trending