Hijabi reporter on C4 News and the Nice massacre. Your thoughts?

Women don't wear it of their own free will.They wear it because they are compelled within islam to do so.How exactly am I talking ******** about muslim countries? These countries do oppress women and gay people.In indonesia a women was recently caned for standing too close to her boyfriend.In saudi arabia women can't drive or go anywhere without a male guardian.In iran gay people are hanged from cranes.I'm not sure that there is much of a distinction between throwing gay people of roofs as isis do and hanging them.But of course nothing to do with islam right? What exactly have I said that is nonsense about islam? It is you who needs to get your facts right and stop denying the ugly face of islamic ideology.

Women don't wear it of their own free will.They wear it because they are compelled within islam to do so.How exactly am I talking ******** about muslim countries? These countries do oppress women and gay people.In indonesia a women was recently caned for standing too close to her boyfriend.In saudi arabia women can't drive or go anywhere without a male guardian.In iran gay people are hanged from cranes.I'm not sure that there is much of a distinction between throwing gay people of roofs as isis do and hanging them.But of course nothing to do with islam right? What exactly have I said that is nonsense about islam? It is you who needs to get your facts right and stop denying the ugly face of islamic ideology.

and now im saying those are all examples of extremism. and extremists are considered to be muslim by other muslims, just like we dont consider isis to be islamic

and now im saying those are all examples of extremism. and extremists are considered to be muslim by other muslims, just like we dont consider isis to be islamic

We don't consider isis to be islamic because the media want to downplay the link between islamic terrorism and islam.And yes isis are islamic.They follow a literal violent interpretation of the quran rather than a more peaceful one.But that interpretation is still valid and its pretty much the same one the saudis use.You can't argue that any repressive muslim country is not muslim.Saidi arabia is pretty much the birthplace of islam.Thats like arguing the vatican aren't true catholics.They are true muslims.They just follow a more literal interpretation of the quran.Western muslims tend to cherry pick the bits they don't like.They ignore all the violent parts of the text and just focus on the peaceful parts.Doesn't mean their interpretation is more or less valid.

its not due to the media wanting to downplay the link between islam and terrorism, its the fact that more and more people have come to realise the truth that there is no link between the two through the voicing of celebrities, vids and social media.

all of the things that you misinterpret to claim that islam is violen and whatnot is silly, because you allways take the passages out of its context.
im refuting all of these things and still youre here tryna tell me. im a muslim, surely my word should be enough, butt people like you look high and low for unreasonable interpretations of quran and sunnah.

look at this:
http://www.businessinsider.com/muslims-using-sharia-law-against-isis-2014-10

look at this:
http://www.businessinsider.com/muslims-using-sharia-law-against-isis-2014-10

look at this:
http://www.businessinsider.com/muslims-using-sharia-law-against-isis-2014-10

ilook at this:
http://www.businessinsider.com/muslims-using-sharia-law-against-isis-2014-10

look at this:
http://www.businessinsider.com/muslims-using-sharia-law-against-isis-2014-10

Point 7
It is forbidden in Islam to kill emissaries, ambassadors, and diplomats; hence it is forbidden to kill journalists and aid workers.
That's a bit of a leap, isn't it? Why are journalists and aid workers classed as "diplomats"?
In fact, anyone working for the western media (and we all know how even UK Muslims accuse the media of condicting a "war on Islam" would surely be accused of "spreading mischief or corruption", which is punishable by death.
And if an aid worker is helping those opposed to Islam (ISIS) - which they usually are, because it is those ISIS are fighting who are usually in need of humanitarian aid - then they are also liable to be executed. In fact, Muhammad executed an entire tribe simply because he suspected them of providing aid to his enemies (Banu Qurayza).

Also, this is another of the claims that I can find no scriptural reference for.

Here are 10 fundamental edicts the group claims ISIS has violated, as well as the letter itself:
1) It is obligatory to consider Yazidis as People of the Scripture.


2) It is forbidden in Islam to deny women their rights.


3) It is forbidden in Islam to force people to convert.


4) It is forbidden in Islam to disfigure the dead.


5) It is forbidden in Islam to destroy the graves and shrines of Prophets and Companions.


6) It is forbidden in Islam to harm or mistreat Christians or any "People of the Scripture."


7) Jihad in Islam is a purely defensive struggle. It is not permissible without the right cause, the right purpose, and the right rules of conduct.


8) It is forbidden in Islam to kill emissaries, ambassadors, and diplomats — hence it is forbidden to kill journalists and aid workers.


9) Loyalty to one’s nation is permissible in Islam.


10) It is forbidden in Islam to declare a Caliphate without consensus from all Muslims.

You can read the full "Letter to Baghdadi" here: