The Pitt to Peel questions were lovely

Sources on Corn Law repeal were great, essay on Pitt's economic and trade policies also amazing.

The other essay on the Peninsula War seemed a lot harder but didn't have to do it so alls good.

Reply 66

top-lushness

Why was the Wars of the Roses paper so weird????

Like I felt the sources barely linked to the view it was trying to argue, and the essay questions???

Question 2 was so specific and Question 3 was like impossible to find enough reasons?

Can’t understand what they were aiming with it

Reply 67

ed729781

i do stuarts/civil war, my answer for the sources was kinda mid but i demolished the one on James’ religious problems

Reply 68

Guggz

Original post by ed729781

i do stuarts/civil war, my answer for the sources was kinda mid but i demolished the one on James’ religious problems

what sources did you say agree and disagree

Reply 69

top-lushness

Original post by Kahootchamp

For those who did War of the Roses, what order did you put the sources in from most to least agree? Which essay did you choose?

I did essay 2 (rushed because I spent so long on sources)

I said source A and B disagree but for different reasons so not one that more disagrees?
Then I said C and D both agree but D didn’t fully because it was in a different time period (1460) so C did the most.

Reply 70

ed729781

Original post by Guggz

what sources did you say agree and disagree

Sources A agrees, Source C agrees but less, Source B disagrees and honestly what i wrote for Source D is a bit **** but i said it didn’t support it that much

Reply 71

mmsilim

Anyone that does the later tudors, how did you find it?

Reply 72

Guggz

Original post by ed729781

Sources A agrees, Source C agrees but less, Source B disagrees and honestly what i wrote for Source D is a bit **** but i said it didn’t support it that much

was source the one about colonel hutchinson how did that agree? i said disagree lol but it was so bad it was the last one i wrote

Reply 73

mmsilim

Guys for later tudors I picked the 3rd q (social and economic problems 1588-1603), are these good points?
- Poverty
- Inflation
- Class divisions (talked about purveyance and monopolies here)

Reply 74

ed729781

Original post by Guggz

was source the one about colonel hutchinson how did that agree? i said disagree lol but it was so bad it was the last one i wrote

i literally can’t remember now 😭 i think i said something about it talking about pressure put on parliament by the army to bring about his execution

Reply 75

Guggz

Original post by ed729781

i literally can’t remember now 😭 i think i said something about it talking about pressure put on parliament by the army to bring about his execution

ah fair enough that was my qualifying like i said instead it doesn’t support and used the fact it’s a army leaders wife gosh idk how that exam went AT ALL i did the foreign policy essay

Reply 76

ed729781

Original post by Guggz

ah fair enough that was my qualifying like i said instead it doesn’t support and used the fact it’s a army leaders wife gosh idk how that exam went AT ALL i did the foreign policy essay

what paras did you talk about for that? i kinda wanted to do it but i couldn’t think of enough to write for it

Reply 77

Hasbo2005

I did Britain 1930-1997. The sources were lovely. The essay was alright, i did the 1951 election. Although, I mentioned Gaitskell bc i mixed him up with the 1955 election. How many marks would be penalised?

Reply 78

Guggz

Original post by ed729781

what paras did you talk about for that? i kinda wanted to do it but i couldn’t think of enough to write for it

i did first para was it was successful- talked about his rex pacificus and treaty of london 1604 and cleves de julich and qualified with oh but wasn’t successful cos war still broke out and enemy this that
second one was about thirty years war and how the foreign policy was unsuccessful
last one was about the spanish match and the failures
and overall unsuccessful
i wanted to do religon 😭 but i had no clue what did you say?