The Student Room Group

The Official Cambridge Applicants for 2024 Entry Thread

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40
Original post by closetarchivist
I see. This would explain why some ask for at interview admissions tests and others don't and why the content of written work differs. If colleges have different requirements then how does the pooling system work fairly?

Good question.I think I would leave that for @Pembroke Rep to explain.Cambridge colleges have much more automy in many ways than Oxford colleges.
(edited 9 months ago)
Reply 41
Original post by closetarchivist
I suppose this does make sense in that the applicant who’s done more reading probably has a wider range of perspectives on a topic and/or knowledge about a broader range of themes or eras (this is history specific), which may then help them in the interview.

Yep, clearly the Cambridge interviewers and decision makers know what they are doing, as they managed to flush out the one candidate that had the wider and deeper knowledge, and I suspect greater enthusiasm for the subject. Can't be easy when you have say 8 applicants for every place, and they all have great Grades/PS/references and have typically done some practice interviews.
Original post by lalexm
Yep, clearly the Cambridge interviewers and decision makers know what they are doing, as they managed to flush out the one candidate that had the wider and deeper knowledge, and I suspect greater enthusiasm for the subject. Can't be easy when you have say 8 applicants for every place, and they all have great Grades/PS/references and have typically done some practice interviews.


After a particular threshold, admission is down to luck and not ability anymore imho. A Professor once said that he could fill his class with unsuccessful candidates from China and India without impacting the academic quality.
Reply 43
Original post by Wired_1800
After a particular threshold, admission is down to luck and not ability anymore imho. A Professor once said that he could fill his class with unsuccessful candidates from China and India without impacting the academic quality.

I am sure he could have done the same with British candidates also.
Original post by Scotney
I am sure he could have done the same with British candidates also.

Of course. One can easily fill up many top unis with students from Britain. The point was to emphasise the level of competition.
Reply 45
Original post by Wired_1800
After a particular threshold, admission is down to luck and not ability anymore imho. A Professor once said that he could fill his class with unsuccessful candidates from China and India without impacting the academic quality.

I think the Cambridge admissions team do a good job at selecting the best candidates, but the challenge is that there are so many brilliant candidates that the difference between someone who gets in and someone that doesn’t might be minuscule.
Original post by lalexm
I think the Cambridge admissions team do a good job at selecting the best candidates, but the challenge is that there are so many brilliant candidates that the difference between someone who gets in and someone that doesn’t might be minuscule.


I do not think there is anything as the ‘best’ candidates at that level. After a certain threshold i.e. excellent academic record, brilliant interview performance and admission assessments, it is down to luck imho.
Original post by Wired_1800
I do not think there is anything as the ‘best’ candidates at that level. After a certain threshold i.e. excellent academic record, brilliant interview performance and admission assessments, it is down to luck imho.

To some extent it would have to be subjective, wouldn't it? Although I'd like to imagine the interviewers do their very best to be objective, it's a human tendency to gravitate towards some people more naturally than others.
Original post by closetarchivist
To some extent it would have to be subjective, wouldn't it? Although I'd like to imagine the interviewers do their very best to be objective, it's a human tendency to gravitate towards some people more naturally than others.

I agree that the concept of ‘best’ would be subjective. If you remove subjective elements such as the interview and assessing the personal statement, admission would still be based on luck. There are so many exceptional candidates than there are places.
I’m aiming to study Physical NatSci at Cambridge starting 2024. I am really keen to take STEP to make my mathematical application stand out, and I will likely need to as I plan to apply for Maths at Bath and King’s whilst then applying for Physics at UCL, Imperial and Cambridge. For Physics at Cambridge I will need to take the NSAA exam. Will these two coincide or create any complications? Is this feasible? Thanks!
Original post by Unit Ledger
I’m aiming to study Physical NatSci at Cambridge starting 2024. I am really keen to take STEP to make my mathematical application stand out, and I will likely need to as I plan to apply for Maths at Bath and King’s whilst then applying for Physics at UCL, Imperial and Cambridge. For Physics at Cambridge I will need to take the NSAA exam. Will these two coincide or create any complications? Is this feasible? Thanks!


i don't know the dates of the exams

are they released?
Reply 51
Original post by Unit Ledger
I’m aiming to study Physical NatSci at Cambridge starting 2024. I am really keen to take STEP to make my mathematical application stand out, and I will likely need to as I plan to apply for Maths at Bath and King’s whilst then applying for Physics at UCL, Imperial and Cambridge. For Physics at Cambridge I will need to take the NSAA exam. Will these two coincide or create any complications? Is this feasible? Thanks!

NSAA you would sit in October this year. STEP is not necessary and you can only take it each summer so you would already get an offer of you get one, before you can even sit STEP. STEP won't be in an offer for natural sciences.
Reply 52
Original post by beautifulworld
i don't know the dates of the exams

are they released?


The NSAA dates are released, idk about STEP
Reply 53
Hey everyone!

I'm an incoming second year at the other place (Oxford!) studying Geography.

At this point in applying, I was seeking every opportunity I could to be able to maximise my chances of applying successfully and this time two years ago found Oxbridge Plus which is a free mentoring and mock interview programme where current students are trained and provide free advice for prospective applicants.

I've not been asked to share this I'm genuinely doing it because it helped me so much and I hope that it can help just one other person.

They do a range of subjects but not all but definitely worth having a look :smile:

https://oxbridgeplus.webador.co.uk

Any questions on applying to Oxbridge I'll be keeping my eye on this thread too!
Reply 54
Original post by Grace FB
1) Biology, chemistry, maths, EPQ
2)Natural sciences, has more breadth than just a single science and allows me to follow both biological and chemical routes, to hopefully specialise in zoology
3)all 9s
4)Oxford does not offer the breadth of natural sciences, and only offers biological sciences. I would rather enjoy learning both biology and chemistry and degree level, and then narrow my options over the years, as I think there is a huge overlap between biology and chemistry which would be useful in a future career
5)NSAA, summer
6)essay competitions, 3 online courses, applications for summer schools, work experience, reading, academic competitions
7) maybe go into zoological research/ zoological presenter
8)not sure- Pembroke, downing, Corpus Christi look nice but havent properly looked!


Which essay competitions did you take part in, if you don’t mind me asking?
Original post by Ariichu
The NSAA dates are released, idk about STEP


thank you, Ariichu
Alright. Thanks. Since I’m applying to Maths at two places, I need to do it anyway. How would I go about letting Cambridge, Imperial and UCL (where I am applying for Physics) know? Is this even worth it?
Original post by Unit Ledger
Alright. Thanks. Since I’m applying to Maths at two places, I need to do it anyway. How would I go about letting Cambridge, Imperial and UCL (where I am applying for Physics) know? Is this even worth it?


i might email or phone them and say, "i don't know the dates of the exams, but they might coincide. i might need to take a test at a rescheduled date" or something along those lines

this is to let them know what's coming ahead in your life
Reply 58
Original post by sfdadsfds
Hey all,

This is the final year of Personal Statements on UCAS before they get scrapped next year (2025).

Remember to demonstrate your PASSION, ABILITY and POTENTIAL in your Personal Statements. These are the skills the Admissions Tutors are looking for in particular.

How are you all feeling?

Have you started putting your Personal Statement together yet?

Are you feeling confident about getting admitted into the University of Cambridge?

Cheers!

Not really being scrapped though, just changing in format.
Reply 59
Original post by sfdadsfds
Hey all,

This is the final year of Personal Statements on UCAS before they get scrapped next year (2025).

Remember to demonstrate your PASSION, ABILITY and POTENTIAL in your Personal Statements. These are the skills the Admissions Tutors are looking for in particular.

How are you all feeling?

Have you started putting your Personal Statement together yet?

Are you feeling confident about getting admitted into the University of Cambridge?

Cheers!

Indeed. Last year of Personal Statements, at least in the current essay style format.

I can't imagine many people are feeling confident about getting in. I have one daughter that got in last year and another one that will give it a go this years for 2024 entry, but with so many great applicants for every place, she realistically doesn't think she will get in, but will give it her best shot and see what happens. She has also gone to open days at other Unis and would be very excited about going to them if Cambridge does not happen, which I think is healthy.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending