I have real and intense organisational, mood, social and anxiety difficulties. I am bipolar with suspected ADHD, waiting on an assessment to diagnose the latter. I have also been diagnosed with bpd but I dispute that, I believe that I have been misdiagnosed and have instead undiagnosed ADHD. As anyone with mental health problems knows, it takes a lot of time and fighting to be seen and diagnosed, let alone given any support, within the NHS. I applied for funding for an ADHD assessment via the Access to Learning Fund but was turned down as they dont consider ADHD a learning disability and therefore do not consider that a diagnosis would make any difference to my studies. I believe they are wrong on this but theres nothing I can do about it other than wait for as long as it takes for the NHS to see me, as I dont have the finances for a private assessment.
So. I do get a DSA and have received a laptop as part of that at the beginning of my course (I am in my third year of a six year pt OU degree). It is not practical to imagine that I have my laptop on and on my lap 24/7. That is the difference between a PDA and a laptop. I would use a PDA as a memory aid (my short term memory is bad, especially when I am hyperactive), as an organisational tool so that I can get my coursework in on time and organise my revision, and therefore help to quiet my anxiety some. My anxiety is no small issue - it can be completely paralysing. When my extreme moods or anxiety is triggered I am not even able to remember or move myself to do basic things like eat.
Unfortunately one of the biggest triggers of this anxiety is deadlines and exams. I go to pieces. I am unable to structure my time effectively to avoid triggering because of what I think is ADHD - I procrastinate, I find it difficult to focus, etc. This why I and my assessor requested a PDA. Its all very well saying 'you have a laptop' but my problems exist 24/7, I need constant support. A laptop is where you do your work and your main organising/timetabling, a PDA is a set of alarms and memory aids in your pocket, on 24/7.
I was approved a PDA. Problem - PDAs are technologically obsolete. The recommended device, despite costing nearly as much as a new device, is totally out of date - several operating system generations behind what is currently available, and incompatible with the software I already use on my laptop. In particular, I have come to rely on Onenote, which is just about the best piece of software I have ever used in terms of my mental health issues, allowing me to gather everything in one place and try to keep track of it.
Since 2008 the Smartphone has superceded the PDA. This is a fact. However, despite having been allocated funding for the obsolete (for my purposes) PDA, I have been refused to instead purchase a smartphone. I dont even need the phone functions - I have an old mobile phone I use occasionally to talk and text, but I have problems communicating over the phone so its really more something I use for emergencies. I have a payasyougo sim card that I spend £5 on every three months - that is how little I use it. Im not after a smartphone for multimedia capabilities either - I can get into facebook etc even on my old phone, and I rarely do because I just dont need to. What I need is a PDA that is running a current OS and is therefore compatible with my pc software.
So I have been granted all this money for a PDA I cant use, and yet am apparently not allowed to use it to get one I can, simply because it will have a mobile phone function and is therefore viewed as a social device.
This is just crazy thinking on the part of the DSA regulations. Thats what Ive been told the problem is - DSA regulations allow PDAs but not smartphones. I cant find where this regulation is written, whether it is national guidelines or specific to the OU. But as rules go, it seems crazy to be prepared to spend money on an old device that is, as I say, several generations of operating system out of date, but not be prepared to spend the same money on any of the systems that have replaced it. This can only be about a bigoted ideology - the idea that disabled people are scroungers looking to blag some free stuff. There is no logic to this 'regulation' - it only has validity if you believe that people who are disabled are blaggers who cant be trusted.
Ive sent in an email to appeal, but it really bugged me seeing an assessor on this thread suggesting that there is no good reason for a pda. There are good reasons. A pda and a laptop are two entirely different devices. Someone who needs constant support via alarms, memory aids etc will of course benefit from use of a pda. You dont honestly expect us to have our computers always on and always with us? And the other way, you dont expect us to do our coursework on a pda? It is blatantly obvious that these devices offer different capabilities and are used in different ways, but that they can collaborate (through compatible software) to create a more whole system.
No 'most students' do not have mobile phones that can do what a pda does. Where is the evidence for this statement? Taiko - You make your decision from an unevidenced assumption. If a student already has a mobile device which has pda capabilities, why on earth would they or their assessor request another? It makes no logical sense - unless youre assuming theyre just on the blag. Is that the case??