Said it before but £100k over 3 years for Sagna at 32 would be unbelievably stupid from us. If we want to 'reward' his loyalty then buy him a nice watch on his last day or something, seriously. At the same age Bergkamp would get 1 year extensions on the same pay for instance. It's club policy.
Sagna has been a great servant but let's not forget that Wenger plucked him out of obscurity and gave him the platform to become a French international whilst paying him a very reasonable salary for a wing back. Not to mention the period 2011-2013 when Sagna was actually rather poor and there were widespread calls to replace him, which we didn't.
And anyway, if we reward those who have been loyal to us with overpriced contracts at the end of their career then we're losing on both sides of the coin. On the one hand RVP et all ****s off after all we did for him, on the other we hand out £100k contracts to 32 year old wing backs. When exactly do Arsenal win out of it all? Arsenal are a club that players milk far too often for my liking. Doesn't happen elsewhere. Abidal was given his marching orders by Barca, Reina by Liverpool even though he was 'loyal', Ashley Cole is being told to do one by Chelsea in the summer as well because his wages are too high, dont see them offering him a pay rise over 3 years...
Imagine we signed Aurier, he'd probably be on £60,000 a week. Over 3 years you've saved £6m in wages which would basically mean you've paid his transfer fee on the wage differential. For a 21 year old who is one of the hottest RBs in Europe, and he's desperate to join AFC apparently. Bit of a no brainer if you ask me.