I'm a pansexual female, AMA?

Honestly I feel like everyone could be pansexual if they met the right person and fell hard enough in love, I don't understand why we insist on labelling ourselves and others. I think we should just all like who we like and quit talking about this. I think inclination to sexualities are entirely nurture rather than nature, and I think the whole world should be over 'sexuality' now and just accept that anyone can fall for anyone.

Honestly I feel like everyone could be pansexual if they met the right person and fell hard enough in love, I don't understand why we insist on labelling ourselves and others. I think we should just all like who we like and quit talking about this. I think inclination to sexualities are entirely nurture rather than nature, and I think the whole world should be over 'sexuality' now and just accept that anyone can fall for anyone.

Honestly preach^
I don't like labels at all, I just thought it would be easier to label myself so people can ask questions and learn.

Alright, so in that sense you'd be right, normal is defined in a dictionary as 'common' but I suppose my idea of normal is what 'should be' and not what 'is'. So while something might be normal by your definition, it doesn't feel like something that should be normal. Maybe I need a new word.

That second question was to scope out the type of person you are, you seem intolerant to progressive changes of society and consider normality as something to remain so, considering your use of the word 'abnormal' with a tone to silence and talk down to OP.

You should have been aware that using the word 'abnormal' to describe a person would never be taken as something positively, so what are your reasons for purposely insulting someone, or are you just that bored?

we have labels because we are talking about exceptional minorities.

The overwhelming majority of the world is straight (it's something like 4% identify as gay/lesbian, and 4% bi for the UK, I wonder what the % is for all these other 'labels' such as pansexual etc'

The overwhelming majority of the world has been raised to view a nuclear family unit as the norm, and is therefore obviously going to be inclined to assume that that's the future for them from a young age, and perhaps that creates a sense of familiarity and security and comfort which could in turn have the effect of making straight relationships seem in general more appealing? I'm sure if the world was overwhelmingly not straight, future generations would grow up with the same inclinations?

Why do you feel the need to be anon?

Virgin.

I was a little unsure at first, but now I'm just like "who cares."

That's not a question, but yes I am, thank you for noticing.

Ew how can anyone be attracted to pans. I mean i have cooked in some nice ones but i would date it, that's disgusting.

I think the most important question hasn't been asked yet.

Are you attracted to pans?

I think the most important question hasn't been asked yet.

Are you attracted to pans?

Pans are surprisingly sensual lovers.
I draw the line at sleeping with the same pans that I cook with, high risk of Sexually transmitted stir-frys.

Yes, woks give me the biggest lady boners.