Student accused of rape despite the alleged victim sexting him afterwards

Read up my last reply

And straight away this favours the student.

Intercourse was clearly there.

Going off what the article has told us, her sexting, sending nudes blah blah then going on to continue their relationship afterwards shows consent was there. The former could be proven as they'd be saved in phone messages.

So once again, doesn't everything heavily favour the male? It seems like she consented and it was just another day. Then when her boyfriend found out weeks or months later (article doesn't state timescales), her mindset changed and she thinks that he was forcing himself upon her. Which considering the fact that everything was completely normal after that incident, is suspicious to say the least.

I'd bet money that no one will be charged as a result of this case

what has you assblasted?

Sorry didn't quite catch the rest of that reply...

Caught the fact you did a cheeky edit though.

I really hate the way they publish his name, location, and picture when he hasn't been convicted... If he turns out to be innocent this kind of screws him over. :[

Return to the depths of tumblr where you came from.

I still don't know what has you upset.

A wonderful fact about our justice system (and ANY justice system worth its salt) is that it's open. We can see what's going, we can be aware of what went on, what the evidence was etc. so that we can see whether things are being done properly, and can make our own minds up if we think they aren't.

This


Sorry don't talk **** I'm used to little teenage meninism waffles I went into default mode but if you aren't making this a women vs men situation then I'm fine. I don't live off tumblr, I don't go on tumblr. I'm used to the kids on here doing their worst if you are indeed the exception then sorry.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3390629/Durham-University-student-accused-rape-tells-court-alleged-victim-sent-flirty-Facebook-messages-including-sexy-pictures-bra-sex.html

Looks like Southparks joke about requiring consent forms was true after all.

So.... are you going to explain to everyone why you've diverted the topic as a result of being mad at god knows what or do you just talk **** on the internet for the sake of it?

For the third and last time, what exactly are you mad at? And what's meninism got to do with this thread.... stop going off topic.

I honestly feel embarrassed for you.

It would lead very silly people to that assumption.

and this is a case where people accused of rape should have their identities protected unless they are convicted.

This is a case that exposes the competing issues very well indeed.

He is now being traduced in the press but the second victim, who was unaware of her alleged assailant's identity, only came forward because of the publicity in this case. If his identity had been protected, he would not now be standing trial for the alleged attack on her.

And supposing he is acquitted of ask charges people will forget the allegations were ever made?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Except the media that presents these cases is usually biased and the Daily Mail will take the most sensationalist part and twist it to thier own agenda.

And Callum is right, consent is delivered prior (or during intercourse) it is not granted afterward. Consent can be withdrawn at ANY time including during the act. If the sex continues after the other says no - then it is rape.

As to whether she would continue to have consensual sex after a rape. This DOES happen. Quite a bit. It happens a lot in abusive relationships.