The Student Room Group

Socialists rally against PUA, MPs try another country ban

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
"A second option for monitoring women is a combination of rigid cultural rules and sex-specific laws. Women would not be able to attend university unless the societal need is urgent where an able-minded man could not be found to fill the specific position. Women would not be able to visit establishments that serve alcohol without a man present to supervise her consumption. Parental control software on electronic devices would be modified for women to control and monitor the information they consume. Credit card and banking accounts must have a male co-signer who can monitor her spending. Curfews for female drivers must be enacted so that women are home by a reasonable hour. Abortion for women of all ages must be signed off by her guardian, in addition to prescriptions for birth control."

:lolwut:
This guy is insane.
The good news is he has called off his worldwide manlet meet ups.
Original post by DiddyDec
Just dress up as a refugee, they seem to be able to get into most countries.


Then you'll be detained and put on a boat to Christmas Island where you'll live in squalid conditions til you die - that's what happens to refugees in Australia.
Original post by Quantex
The good news is he has called off his worldwide manlet meet ups.


Awh I was going to go :frown: mainly to **** stir but hey ho
Original post by redferry
Then you'll be detained and put on a boat to Christmas Island where you'll live in squalid conditions til you die - that's what happens to refugees in Australia.


The more you know. Although maybe he will like it on Christmas Island.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by redferry
Awh I was going to go :frown: mainly to **** stir but hey ho


But do you know the secret code?
Original post by The Arsonist
But do you know the secret code?


Where's the pet shop m8?


Ps I hate women.
He thinks rape should be legal if on private property. Free speech =/= consequence-free speech. Why do people find that so hard to understand?
Original post by Josb
"A second option for monitoring women is a combination of rigid cultural rules and sex-specific laws. Women would not be able to attend university unless the societal need is urgent where an able-minded man could not be found to fill the specific position. Women would not be able to visit establishments that serve alcohol without a man present to supervise her consumption. Parental control software on electronic devices would be modified for women to control and monitor the information they consume. Credit card and banking accounts must have a male co-signer who can monitor her spending. Curfews for female drivers must be enacted so that women are home by a reasonable hour. Abortion for women of all ages must be signed off by her guardian, in addition to prescriptions for birth control."

:lolwut:
This guy is insane.


He's disgusting.
Original post by redferry
Where's the pet shop m8?


I mean the secret secret co--

Ps I hate women.


Welcome, brother.
Amazing how authoritarian people can be when they don't like someone.

He sounds like a tool, but that's no grounds for denying entry to someone. If he had been convicted of rape, or hate speech or something, that would be different.

When immigration authorities are taking instructions from social media mobs, you know the world is going mad.
He wants rape to be legalised on private property.

This is why the MRA cult is such a joke. It's groups of lonely virgins worshiping sexist, misogynistic PUAs.
Take a look at MGTOW.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Jebedee
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3427647/The-seedy-code-followers-pro-rape-pick-artist-Daryush-Valizadeh-known-Roosh-V-use-accepted-Australian-meetings.html

Socialists going wild and planning protests to demonstrate lack of understanding of satire and lack of value for free speech.

Thoughts?


The guys is right about some things, like when he says:

"the more worthless they consider a woman, the higher chance you will be able to convince her to sleep with you."

Women love guys that f*** with their heads, i.e. being really sweet one moment, but then being indifferent and treating them crappy, the next.

Not everything he says should be written off. There are some nuggets of truth in there.



Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 33
Original post by anarchism101
Not seeing the relevance here? What's so important about the timing?



After he'd been called out on it, you mean?

Posted from TSR Mobile


Well he said it wasn't satire within the last 2 days. Before the BBC thing no one really paid that much mind to that article in comparison. It is clear he only stated it wasn't satire to stir up the crazies when they started planning protests.
Nothing to be called out on.



Original post by abruiseonthesky
He thinks rape should be legal if on private property. Free speech =/= consequence-free speech. Why do people find that so hard to understand?


Original post by Bornblue
He wants rape to be legalised on private property.

This is why the MRA cult is such a joke. It's groups of lonely virgins worshiping sexist, misogynistic PUAs.
Take a look at MGTOW.


Oh look there's more of you. As much as you dislike the guy, he does not want rape to be legalised. No amount of false press or angry mob tactics will change that I'm afraid.
Original post by Jebedee
Well he said it wasn't satire within the last 2 days. Before the BBC thing no one really paid that much mind to that article in comparison. It is clear he only stated it wasn't satire to stir up the crazies when they started planning protests.
Nothing to be called out on.







Oh look there's more of you. As much as you dislike the guy, he does not want rape to be legalised. No amount of false press or angry mob tactics will change that I'm afraid.

He wrote an article arguing that rape should be legalised on private property.
Reply 35
Original post by Bornblue
He wrote an article arguing that rape should be legalised on private property.


If you can't keep up with the thread....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAYJvSB9jso
Original post by Jebedee
Look at when that comment was posted. Clearly just to annoy feminists.
He has posted 2-3 videos since then stating that it is satire. Not including the references in the BBC hit piece.


Are you sure this wasn't just one of the common cases in which a person states opinions which are terrible, and then after being called out for them, claims it's a satire?
Original post by Jebedee
If you can't keep up with the thread....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAYJvSB9jso


How convenient, he says it was satire.
Don't believe him.
Reply 38
Original post by Bornblue
How convenient, he says it was satire.Don't believe him.


Original post by The Socktor
Are you sure this wasn't just one of the common cases in which a person states opinions which are terrible, and then after being called out for them, claims it's a satire?


He never even needed to claim it was satire as it is obvious to anyone with a positive value IQ. He only stated afterwards while in shock that there were people who didn't realise.

Read the first paragraph, it should scream satire.

"I keep reading in the mainstream media that there is a rape culture in the United States. This issue concerns me since I have a sister who I don’t want to be raped, so I carefully examined the articles on Salon, Buzzfeed, and Huffington Post that were written by professional journalists who pursue truth and justice over mass hysteria and delirium."

Here's another clue you missed.

I knew from an early age that rape was bad, as was all forms of violence, not just against women but men as well. I also knew that killing, stealing, and having sexual interest in relatives was bad. I don’t remember if someone specifically taught me these rules, but I also don’t remember being taught that the sun rises and sets once a day, or that I will go splat if I jump off a tall building. I don’t know of a single man entering adulthood who thought that rape was good and had to be manually taught it was bad in order to stop him from raping, so when journalists and cultural commentators suggest that the best way to defeat rape culture is to teach men not to rape, I couldn’t possibly agree. I saw a different set of problems instead.

Sarcasm based on feminist beliefs.

The general tone is sarcastic the whole way through. You should read the actual article rather than the daily mail one.
Original post by Quantex
"My default opinion of any girl I meet is worthless dirty wh**e until proven otherwise" seems to be really stretching the definition of satire. Sounds more like the sort of views you'd get from those men involved in the Cologne attacks.

Although I wouldn't bother banning him, it just gives him more publicity.


That's the kicker really, It's what we get when we cross a globalised internet/news network with celebrity obsession.

More and more we're seeing individuals doing whatever they can to gain infamy, because to them it's close enough to fame to count. Bieber and Black were some of the first to benefit from being disliked, Trump is one of the first to directly engineer it, other examples being Katie Hopkins and I'm sure plenty others

God knows how we counter it though, so long as the news continues to report on how hated someone is they will just keep gaining momentum... apathy is the only cure

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending