Which is better, Nottingham or Surrey ?

...

For the Biosciences, particularly Nutrition & Dietetics.

keep in mind that Nottingham would be the SB campus, not the main one.

I like both courses very much, but the Notts one provides a undergraduate masters in the same number of years, though I thin I prefer the structure of Surrey's.

Nottingham is catered, but Surrey is in a nice area much further from home (I'm 15 mins away from the SB campus) so I could get the 'full experience'.

Surrey's Nutrition dept. is larger, and they specialise in my particular research interests, Nottingham's course is smaller and more informal, with a more varied, yet much less optional course content.

Surrey is performing alot higher on student satisfaction and the league tables, Notingham is RG and ranks higher internationally.

I kind of want to start a new life for myself though, specialising in the science that I so much enjoy. being at Nottingham, likely with many people from my area and school (of which I have had VERY bad experiences, might weigh me down)

Also, to throw a spanner into the mix there is KCL. KCL is more city based, which I dislike, I also vastly prefer the structure of Surrey and Nottingham's course, though KCL ranks the highest internationally.

Thoughts?