I think that there is no one answer that fits all. Whilst a child born on the 31st of August or 1st of September may find his place intellectually and emotionally in a class of elder children, another may be able to follow the academic work but find himself marginalised by his/ her classmates due to a lack of maturity. Teachers will pick up on any problem related to the intellectual abilities of a child but if they only have that person for a couple of lessons a week will be unlikely to notice any psychological suffering.
I’m neither against children being kept down or jumping classes, but I think if this is to be beneficial then it should be accompanied by an educational psychologist. Without this, a child who repeats a year will see it as a punishment or the proof of his lack of intelligence and won’t do any better the second time round.Whereas if correctly presented, redoing a year can be a real opportunity to anchor educational principles solidly. Similarly, some children are intellectually and emotionally in advance of their classmates, and whilst for most of these children teachers can adapt the workload in a way that will keep them occupied and in some cases challenged, there are some rare cases where the child is so intelligent that the teacher can not even begin to imagine the thought processes of that child. In these cases the child will just stop making an effort, will see school as a supplice and will most likely pass for the class dunce having completely ceased all participation in the class activities. He/ she may then be asked to re do a year which will only make the problem worse and most likely lead to disciplinary problems. Hence, I believe that any child that is failing in todays school system should undergo a full check up with a qualified neuro paedo psychologist before any decision is made as to jumping or repeating a year. But find the budget…..