Year 12s: what will be the first way you research your future options? >>

AQA A Level History Paper 2 (7042/2A to 2T) 9 June 2023 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Reply 440

lucky7911

Does anyone remember what the time period was for the Kissinger question on 2Q panicking that I messed up!

Reply 441

mavalname

(Original post by lucky7911)Does anyone remember what the time period was for the Kissinger question on 2Q panicking that I messed up!

i messed up asw, i talked ab johnson and u were supposed to do nixon and ford rip

Reply 442

lucky7911

Original post by mavalname

I talked about carter for one of my paras😭😭😭

Reply 443

Kind_Yam_6801

Original post by lucky7911

Does anyone remember what the time period was for the Kissinger question on 2Q panicking that I messed up!

69 - 76 - so it would be expected for you to talk about ford (I did but not in much detail cus i knew **** all lol)

Reply 444

Highgate345

Original post by lucky7911

I talked about carter for one of my paras😭😭😭

you could have? the helsinki accords was in 75 so yeah the date range allowed for limited discussion of carter

Reply 445

HardLadHenry

Original post by Highgate345

you could have? the helsinki accords was in 75 so yeah the date range allowed for limited discussion of carter

Helisinki accords were Ford. Carter criticised them but im not sure how that could get into a kissinger essay

Reply 446

Highgate345

Original post by HardLadHenry

Helisinki accords were Ford. Carter criticised them but im not sure how that could get into a kissinger essay

the question was Kissinger directed FP no? or did you not evaluate with instances where he was not directing FP?

Reply 447

HardLadHenry

Original post by Highgate345

the question was Kissinger directed FP no? or did you not evaluate with instances where he was not directing FP?

I sturctured it as instances where he did direct and then where he didnt. Helsinki accords is a valid evidence, just it doesnt allow for discussion of carter

Reply 448

Highgate345

Original post by HardLadHenry

I sturctured it as instances where he did direct and then where he didnt. Helsinki accords is a valid evidence, just it doesnt allow for discussion of carter

thats what i did as well. I wrote something on the Helsinki accords and wrongly put carter down lmao but much of carters FP is later so you're right

Reply 449

hamlethath12

hey how did history go?! : ) I feel like the history examiners were quite harsh : (

Reply 450

Kind_Yam_6801

Original post by hamlethath12

hey how did history go?! : ) I feel like the history examiners were quite harsh : (

i got 143/200, to get an A u needed 140💀I thought I did way better but 164 for an A* is criminal

Reply 451

AnotherStudent!

Original post by Kind_Yam_6801

i got 143/200, to get an A u needed 140💀I thought I did way better but 164 for an A* is criminal

I'm the same, thought I bossed it but I only just squeezed into getting an A lolz. Lowkey thought I would be near an A*

Reply 452

nikimitchell86

Original post by c8ssid7mull8n

Does anyone do 2M - Wars and Welfare?

hi there do you remember the topics that came up on the paper??

Reply 453

nikimitchell86

Original post by IsMiseGeorge

AQA literally reused a previous source this year for 2M - Source 1 of the 30 marker was already used in 2017, they just slightly condensed it this year - it is the exact same source otherwise. Very strange of them.

hi was the question on the formation of the national government?? and which source was reused

Reply 454

nikimitchell86

Original post by KoalaKat

yeah i'm thinking the same thing. i also am wondering if the source will be on unit 1 or 4 (hasn't been done yet) or possibly unit 2 (2018 source). But I kinda need the 2021 paper to fill in the gaps