The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60
paella
Innocent until proven guilty, it's barbaric that these people aren't tried and instead are just held captive.


Most were found fighting in Afghanistan against the Northern Alliance and most were foreign fighters. Since they were not part of a regular army or state they couldn't be given prisoner of war status. They were declared enemy combatants and it was a highly sensitive time, an appropriate response was required and it was executed well.

Note Saddam's Baathists were NOT taken to gitmo as they were official state members and were awarded prisoner of war status.



It's a war your country has brought upon itself. Look at it this way. To the Taliban america are terrorists, who must be destroyed. You've stated before that you wish to join the Army, if you were taken away from your country, given no trial, and repeatedly tortured, would you say it was fair?


How silly. It's a war against non muslims, so called infidels propelled by Quranic verses. A war against the west because they grant equality for all races, sexes, orientation much to their dislike e.t.c.

Ah and me joining the Army? Well I would be joining an official organisation so would be awarded prisoner of war status like the Baathists :yes:

Also comparing the US army with Taleban. Bit silly don't you think :s-smilie:
Reply 61
Reefer
Are you surprised? After going through that crap do you really think that they're going to come out and love us?

Maybe they should have been tried properly and if deemed a threat actually put in a proper prison instead of being tortured!


Its not like they were innocent before and then picked up a new cause. They RETURNED to terrorism. You really think theyd like us more if they were in prison? Theyd be torn to shreds in prison lets get serious.

The prisons are already overflowing anyways.

Personally i think they should just kill them when they get captured on the battlefield, its reallly a shame America is bashed for trying to do the right thing.
Reply 62
Harris
Terrorists whop returned to terror

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/4230850/Released-Guantnamo-Bay-detainees-return-to-terrorism.html

And waterboarding is in no way torture. Torture is defined by permanent physical or mental scarring. The US walks a fine line of course, but they need to as no pressure gets nothing and real torture can be completely inhumane.


The Americans called it torture when the Chinese were using it to get false confessions from American GIs in Korea. Beating a suspect with rubber hoses would also not come under torture from your definition. The definition of torture thats accepted by people who don't actually torture is a set of techniques designed to coerce a confession usually (but not always) through pain.
Hylean
By that logic, the American people don't deserve humans rights because they have been disregarding them in regards to Guantanamo and even the Socialists during the Cold War.


You are being too politcally correct in regards to this.

You still deserve Human rights if all you have done is disregarded Human Rights when handling someone who does not deserve them (Hitler, Mugabe, Saddam)
Reply 64
Harris
Its not like they were innocent before and then picked up a new cause. They RETURNED to terrorism. You really think theyd like us more if they were in prison? Theyd be torn to shreds in prison lets get serious.

The prisons are already overflowing anyways.

Personally i think they should just kill them when they get captured on the battlefield, its reallly a shame America is bashed for trying to do the right thing.


I think that they should be tried in military courts (not civilian as it's a military matter) and the leaders should all be executed by Lethal Injection or Electric Chair. The rest should get many years in prison and those minority which are not guilty should be deported back to their own country. I am sick of countries like Portugal, Botswana being asked to take them.

It's like the case of the Somali Pirate who stabbed one of the americans on the ship they hijacked, and was later caught. He said he was happy to get to go New York and has asked for his family to be allowed to come!
Yet at a time when American casualties in Afghanistan are rising and an American soldier has been captured by the Taliban, our interrogators may not touch or even threaten any al-Qaida or Taliban prisoners in an effort to extract information.


Don't be ridiculous. They did it to themselves. You can't slap someone and expect NOT to be slapped back.

The blatant truth is that they need to get the heck out of there, they're not in good shape to even manage their own country and they dare tell other countries what to do with themselves.

The UK acted ridiculously too. The US making a mistake is one thing, but being a complice to that is straight-up stupid.
Reply 66
Harris
Its not like they were innocent before and then picked up a new cause. They RETURNED to terrorism. You really think theyd like us more if they were in prison? Theyd be torn to shreds in prison lets get serious.

The prisons are already overflowing anyways.

Personally i think they should just kill them when they get captured on the battlefield, its reallly a shame America is bashed for trying to do the right thing.


But wouldn't that put the Americans in the same boat as inhuman terrorists?

But of course you are a neocon and you're just the other extreme end of the scale with the other lot of inherently evil people...so that would make sense, yes! :yes:
Reply 67
Neo Con
That may be your assertion, but it worked. The CIA report showed it saved lives. The CIA are independent of the bush administration, even now under Obama, they are still adamant that it saved lives.

This all helped kill/capture most of al qaeda's top people and supress some seriously bad plots.

I think you have the image in your mind where the americans say "tell me a name or i'll rip your nails out."


Stop being such a nieve child. These people are religious fundamentalists, they believe that there salvation and there God compels them to do what they do. If these techniques didn't really damage ones mind, of course they wouldn't tell.
Reply 68
Neo Con
How silly. It's a war against non muslims, so called infidels propelled by Quranic verses. A war against the west because they grant equality for all races, sexes, orientation much to their dislike e.t.c.

Ah and me joining the Army? Well I would be joining an official organisation so would be awarded prisoner of war status like the Baathists


They have no interest in the west, they want us to stay out of the east.
Reply 69
Neo Con
I think that they should be tried in military courts (not civilian as it's a military matter) and the leaders should all be executed by Lethal Injection or Electric Chair. The rest should get many years in prison and those minority which are not guilty should be deported back to their own country. I am sick of countries like Portugal, Botswana being asked to take them.

It's like the case of the Somali Pirate who stabbed one of the americans on the ship they hijacked, and was later caught. He said he was happy to get to go New York and has asked for his family to be allowed to come!


Why keep them in US prisons? Kill them there and get it done with.
Reply 70
Using torture on them is stupid whatever their motives are.
Reply 71
Reefer
But wouldn't that put the Americans in the same boat as inhuman terrorists?

But of course you are a neocon and you're just the other extreme end of the scale with the other lot of inherently evil people...so that would make sense, yes! :yes:


Not at all...terrorist blow up kindergardens, planes and hide weapons in hospitals to inflict maximum damage on both sides.

All Im suggesting is that instead of capturing a terrorist for a drawn out trial you just kill them right there on the battlefield.

Because you clearly dont understand what a war is, how your moral compass needs major fixing, mixed with your Liberal utopian view on the world, I feel that I can rest my case.
Reply 72
paella
They have no interest in the west, they want us to stay out of the east.


They want to establish an Islamic Caliphate over the world, because that is what the Quran preaches, one government with Shariya law.

Small areas in the west with high muslim populations are demanding shariya style courts, divorce rules e.t.c They despite the western system.
Harris
Its not like they were innocent before and then picked up a new cause. They RETURNED to terrorism. You really think theyd like us more if they were in prison? Theyd be torn to shreds in prison lets get serious.

The prisons are already overflowing anyways.

Personally i think they should just kill them when they get captured on the battlefield, its reallly a shame America is bashed for trying to do the right thing.


0.51 onwards
Reply 74
Neo Con
They want to establish an Islamic Caliphate over the world, because that is what the Quran preaches, one government with Shariya law.

Small areas in the west with high muslim populations are demanding shariya style courts, divorce rules e.t.c They despite the western system.


What's wrong with that?

The Christian religion affects the laws and governance of the West. If you invite and purport to respect other cultures, then you ought to be as accommodating as possible. And treat all cultures equally!
Reply 75
Harris
Why keep them in US prisons? Kill them there and get it done with.


Because summarily executing an idiot squad home guard militia, a modern day Judean People's Front with a few fanatics and a bunch of young men dumb enough to take them seriously who think they are making a stand against looters, those bloody sunnis/shiites (delete as appropriate) round the corner and the Hamburger eating Johnny Foreigner who are trying to come into their neighborhood doesn't win hearts and minds. Instead, it encourages people to stop thinking about looters and those bloody (other) muslims alltogether and start just thinking about the Americans.
Reply 76
Harris
Not at all...terrorist blow up kindergardens, planes and hide weapons in hospitals to inflict maximum damage on both sides.

All Im suggesting is that instead of capturing a terrorist for a drawn out trial you just kill them right there on the battlefield.

Because you clearly dont understand what a war is, how your moral compass needs major fixing, mixed with your Liberal utopian view on the world, I feel that I can rest my case.


Are you definining terrorist as someone who engages in acts of terrorism or as a brown person not wearing a uniform who shoots a bolt action at coalition forces?
Reply 77
Hopefully US guards/ interrogators at Gitmo like to spank the naughty child-soldiers. God know they deserve it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drITG-ejqm8&feature=channel_page

"Lawyer: U.S. Government abused Convention on Rights of Child"

Tomato vendor witness came forward--> classic
Reply 78
kultist
Because summarily executing an idiot squad home guard militia, a modern day Judean People's Front with a few fanatics and a bunch of young men dumb enough to take them seriously who think they are making a stand against looters, those bloody sunnis/shiites (delete as appropriate) round the corner and the Hamburger eating Johnny Foreigner who are trying to come into their neighborhood doesn't win hearts and minds. Instead, it encourages people to stop thinking about looters and those bloody (other) muslims alltogether and start just thinking about the Americans.


Lol that definitely wasn't my reason for not executing them all. I think they should all be tried individually and by a just military court. Some of them are chief plotters and financers, others foot soldiers who are still dangerous.

Each case needs to be heard carefully. I would definitely execute the top guys, forget hearts and minds, ever heard of justice :rolleyes:

Foot soldiers, possible execution, depends what crimes they exactly committed, age of indoctrination, future threat e.t.c

I remember some Arabic American guy shot dead few CIA employees in the states and then went to eat at McDonalds. When he noticed that they had failed to get his number plate he fled to Pakistan then Afghanistan.

A reward of $2 million was put on his head and eventually he was captured by FBI agents who lured him into a peshawar hotel, he was then bound and blind folded and taken back "home".

The Pakistani govt said do not execute him, it will win over hearts and minds, needless to say the sentence of the court was carried out. (execution) It sent out a strong message of consequences of attacking innocent people.

He had a few banana's as a final meal I think. I don't know why I remember this case so much. :biggrin:
Reply 79
Harris
Not at all...terrorist blow up kindergardens, planes and hide weapons in hospitals to inflict maximum damage on both sides.

All Im suggesting is that instead of capturing a terrorist for a drawn out trial you just kill them right there on the battlefield.

Because you clearly dont understand what a war is, how your moral compass needs major fixing, mixed with your Liberal utopian view on the world, I feel that I can rest my case.



So you advocate terrorism to fight... terrorism? If so, what moral ground do you have to stand on?

And what do you know about war, because this is in no way a war against terrorism otherwise the whole of the westwing and the pentagon would have been convicted of it by now. This war is purely to secure US and western interests.

Latest

Trending

Trending