I've tried to tell him that he stands a good a chance as anyone as long as he gets some decent work experience but he looks at the horrific stats (45-60 applicants per place or something crazy) and just gets scared.
I don't think it's that bad, but yeah 20 applicants per place is not unheard of.
I don't think it's that bad, but yeah 20 applicants per place is not unheard of.
There was one year when Kings GEP had something like 65 applicants per place lol. Absolutely crazy.
Generally you're right though, it's pretty variable, usually anywhere between 5 and 20 applicants per place. Warwick's always a fairly good bet because their admissions policy is very open, and they have far more places than anyone else.
There was one year when Kings GEP had something like 65 applicants per place lol. Absolutely crazy.
Generally you're right though, it's pretty variable, usually anywhere between 5 and 20 applicants per place. Warwick's always a fairly good bet because their admissions policy is very open, and they have far more places than anyone else.
I'm fairly sure Warwick don't consider applicants with a degree in Engineering though unfortunately.
It is tough, there's no doubt about that. I had a bit of a turning point where I realised that if I didn't believe I could do what, what was the point of going to interviews where I was trying to convince them I could do it. I have my strengths the same as any of the other applicants, I have looked into all the medical schools to be sure that the ones I am applying to are the right ones for me, I have researched them and taloired my application to be exactly what they are looking for. So why the hell shouldn't they pick me? I am just as good as anyone else and I can do this. Ahem.. so yeah, positive thinking, that's the key.
It's always going to be competitive when you have limiting amount of places + massive amount of applicants.
I personally feel if they aren't going to provide any funding for graduates on 5 year courses, some of the places for 5 year should be cut to open up some for the graduate stream.
It's always going to be competitive when you have limiting amount of places + massive amount of applicants.
I personally feel if they aren't going to provide any funding for graduates on 5 year courses, some of the places for 5 year should be cut to open up some for the graduate stream.
Wouldn't that in effect reduce the places available for school-leavers?
Wouldn't that in effect reduce the places available for school-leavers?
Yes, I feel there should be equal amount of places for graduates and school leavers.
Graduates bring more to the table with their life experiences and skills from previous degree. Increased competition means you are less likely to get people who drop out after years 1/2 and they will consider their career more carefully.
There were only 9 places for 2010 entry, so imagine the competition being quite stiff. Obviously I don't know how many applicants there were, but with such a low number of places I think it was quite competetive.
I always thought fewer graduates apply to oxbridge because they are less keen on reputation and more on having a medical degree. Probably having a first degree puts them in a good stead to be more realistic about options.
I think it's a mixture of Oxbridge asking for quite specific A levels as well as a degree, and people being unwilling to risk one of their choices on universities they're scared will think they aren't good enough.
I think it's a mixture of Oxbridge asking for quite specific A levels as well as a degree, and people being unwilling to risk one of their choices on universities they're scared will think they aren't good enough.