Now Muslims want Katy Perry music video banned

Come on dude! - You cant liken/suggest/imply muslims who speak out to barking dogs, whats wrong with you? That's seriously rude and offensive.

It's ridiculous! Lady Gaga's videos are intentionally anti-christ and offensive to Christianity but no-body does or says anything about that! Get over it

I'm just speaking out what's morally right. We need to completely get rid this 'them' and 'us' attitude between muslims and non-muslims - a British citizen is a British citizen, no matter where your family comes from.

If a group of citizens dislike the crude nature of a certain artists, fearing social effects, then why should they not fulfill their democratic right and start a petition? I'd so the same.

People, they have the right to free speech and as such, you should respect that as is a basic human right in the western world.
It does not insight hatred nor does it insight violence towards others.

GET A GRIP, it is a music video!

Over 30,000 muslims have signed petition in a couple of days

http://rt.com/news/katy-perry-muslims-petition-666/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567658/Muslim-organises-petition-ban-Katy-Perrys-new-music-video-features-man-wearing-Allah-inscribed-necklace-disintegrated-30-000-signatures-days.html

Where even to begin with Gaga - even though I love her music and the art that goes into her videos

1. Alejandro - the scene where she swallowed/placed the cross in her mouth
2. Judas - her portrayal of Mary Magdalena

These are perhaps the two videos which have caused the most religious offence.

What about Madonna in Like a Prayer?
I remember that the video for one of her songs got pulled the day before/after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and got replaced with a simpler version of the song (I think both versions are on YouTube)

Maybe Katy Perry or her crew should have checked it out before proceeding, or even erasing the scene in the editing suite. However, as has been pointed out previously with reference to Lady Gaga, such scenes have either been removed, censored during daytime hours or the song has just gone to play on the radio instead.

Let's just remember that there are a lot bigger issues than this going on in the world right now.

Hmm...

Quran slams homosexuals and non-Muslims, causing deaths and abuse of innocents = isn't banned, heck it's glorified.

Music video unintentionally burns a name = All hell breaks loose.

Interesting where these people's priorities lie.

What I don't get is why put the pendant in the video in the first place? What purpose does it actually serve - like whoever made the video must have known this would have happened and yet it still appears. My point is why does this BS happen in the first place?

An animal can not have rationale as the word is defined as having a set of logical reasons behind doing an action, which a dog would not have.

What I don't understand is why the petition bothers you. For someone who makes a statement implying that they are more intelligent than 1.8 billion 'dogs', you do not seem to be making much sense.

You expect Muslims to stay quite when their religion is insulted?

Erm except no. Respect goes two ways. There was no need to add this pendant to the man, it adds nothing to the video and almost seems provocative. You say it does not incite hatred, but it does encourage negative connotations when a man wearing a pendant affiliated with a certain religion is 'zapped'. Tbh, if it was only just to do with Katy Perry/sexualization alone there would have been many muslim petitions out already. It's only out for this one because of that clip with the man wearing the religious pendant.

Edit: I'd also like to point out the way you use the word "Now" in front of this post's title has a very subtle islamophobic/racist subtext.