The Student Room Group

How does taking the derivative of unit vector squared prove the following...?

Hi,

please see attachment.
Does anyone understand what the slide is trying to get across? I understand the maths, but I don't understand how taking the derivative of unit vector squared proves the derivative of the unit vector of velocity is perpendicular to the unit vector of velocity.

cheers :smile:
Original post by SWIMSHALLOW
Hi,

please see attachment.
Does anyone understand what the slide is trying to get across? I understand the maths, but I don't understand how taking the derivative of unit vector squared proves the derivative of the unit vector of velocity is perpendicular to the unit vector of velocity.

cheers :smile:


Because their dot product is zero.
The unit vector isn't squared. It's their dot product that's being considered: u.u .
Original post by SWIMSHALLOW
Hi,

please see attachment.
Does anyone understand what the slide is trying to get across? I understand the maths, but I don't understand how taking the derivative of unit vector squared proves the derivative of the unit vector of velocity is perpendicular to the unit vector of velocity.


As others have pointed out, for any two vectors:

ab=0ab\bold{a} \cdot \bold{b} = 0 \Rightarrow \bold{a} \perp \bold{b}

since we have

abcosθ=0θ=π2ab\cos\theta = 0 \Rightarrow \theta = \frac{\pi}{2}

But you should try to understand this intuitively (or graphically maybe).

If u(t)\bold{u}(t) is a unit vector, then its length can't change, by definition. So if it varies with time, only its angle can change. So let it turn through an angle Δθ\Delta \theta in time Δt\Delta t.

Now draw u(t),u(t+Δt)\bold{u}(t), \bold{u}(t+\Delta t) as arrows of unit length originating from some point P. Then Δu=u(t+Δt)u(t)\Delta \bold{u} = \bold{u}(t+\Delta t) - \bold{u}(t) is the arrow from u(t)\bold{u}(t) to u(t+Δt)\bold{u}(t+\Delta t).

As Δt0\Delta t \to 0, Δu\Delta \bold{u} tends to make a right angle with the other two vectors more and more closely (draw diagram and label angles to see this - the angles in question are π2Δθ2\frac{\pi}{2} -\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}), so the change of the unit vector is perpendicular to itself in the limit, and thus so is its rate of change, as that is simply ΔuΔt\frac{\Delta \bold{u}}{\Delta t}, a vector divided by a scalar, which doesn't change the direction of the vector.
Reply 4
Original post by atsruser
As others have pointed out, for any two vectors:

ab=0ab\bold{a} \cdot \bold{b} = 0 \Rightarrow \bold{a} \perp \bold{b}

since we have

abcosθ=0θ=π2ab\cos\theta = 0 \Rightarrow \theta = \frac{\pi}{2}

But you should try to understand this intuitively (or graphically maybe).

If u(t)\bold{u}(t) is a unit vector, then its length can't change, by definition. So if it varies with time, only its angle can change. So let it turn through an angle Δθ\Delta \theta in time Δt\Delta t.

Now draw u(t),u(t+Δt)\bold{u}(t), \bold{u}(t+\Delta t) as arrows of unit length originating from some point P. Then Δu=u(t+Δt)u(t)\Delta \bold{u} = \bold{u}(t+\Delta t) - \bold{u}(t) is the arrow from u(t)\bold{u}(t) to u(t+Δt)\bold{u}(t+\Delta t).

As Δt0\Delta t \to 0, Δu\Delta \bold{u} tends to make a right angle with the other two vectors more and more closely (draw diagram and label angles to see this - the angles in question are π2Δθ2\frac{\pi}{2} -\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}), so the change of the unit vector is perpendicular to itself in the limit, and thus so is its rate of change, as that is simply ΔuΔt\frac{\Delta \bold{u}}{\Delta t}, a vector divided by a scalar, which doesn't change the direction of the vector.


Thanks for the reply bud, appreciate it :smile:

so basically what you're saying is as delta t tends to 0, the angle between the two vectors delta u(t) and delta u (t+delta t) gets smaller and smaller, and ideally when the angle between them is 0, delta u is idealy perpendicular to the two vectors...?
Original post by SWIMSHALLOW
Thanks for the reply bud, appreciate it :smile:

so basically what you're saying is as delta t tends to 0, the angle between the two vectors delta u(t) and delta u (t+delta t) gets smaller and smaller, and ideally when the angle between them is 0, delta u is idealy perpendicular to the two vectors...?


More or less, yes, though your terminology is a bit off (replace "ideally" with "ultimately" or "in the limit").

Draw a picture of what I described and all should be clear.

Quick Reply

Latest