Man stabs 4 people in Munich - shouts 'Allahu Ackbar'

Keep going, buddy. I'm sure someone will eventually rep you.

Turns out the attacker may not have even been Muslim, or the cause of the attack was actually psychological problems. If this turns out to be true, will you keep spamming anti-Islam hate anyway?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/10/one-man-dead-after-attacker-heard-shouting-allahu-akbar-knifes-m/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/munich-stabbing-suspected-islamist-shouts-allahu-akbar-before-launching-attack-at-railway-station-in-a7021816.html

I've realised this too. You're not even allowed to ask simple questions just confirming the story without being attacked one way or another

Please provide sources that back up your statement.

It doesn't say he is a white male, it says he isn't from an immigrant background. That's an ambiguous term. German citizen =/= white male.

'A spokesperson for the state prosecutor's office confirmed that the attack was believed to have a political or "Islamist background" but could not give any further details.'

They are still governed by the Shari'a and there might be workers in Saudi, but there aren't any churches or synagogues, and non-muslims can not go to mecca.

Where did I ever say there was a specific book on the Sharia? I said that the follow the teachings and commandments of muhammed and allah down to the letter, which can be found in the Qur'an and the ahadiths.

I will continue to criticise Islam.

.

.

.

In Saudi, yes, but in the other Muslim countries, there are the facilities for them. There are the other 47 Muslim countries which aren't as twisted. And yes, the other Muslims countries are governed by Shariah which most often don't apply to non-Muslims. You're making it seem as if every Muslim country is evil, bad and corrupt.

You said "letter" - there is no exact letter for anything. If anything, it comes from the Qur'aan and Hadiths with the context not taken into consideration. In that way, the interpretation becomes literal and therefore, wrong and twisted.

You are essentially giving the terrorists who carry out these acts exactly what they want. ISIS would probably celebrate if tomorrow Merkel, Cameron, Hollande, etc, all announced a ban to all Muslims. Especially hilarious, given that Islam isn't the problem here. It's embarrassing that our society has people like you who unconditionally attack islam like Islam is the sole cause of these problems, it evidently isn't.

So the guy wasn't a Muslim? Why do people twist stories to suit their own hateful agendas whether it relates to race or religion

I've realised this too. You're not even allowed to ask simple questions just confirming the story without being attacked one way or another

I guess the problem here was the german man, for allowing himself to be killed by a muslim.

There was no evidence to say that he did shout "Allahu Ackbar", pathetic scapegoating, probably a drunked White considering Muslims can't drink.

Why are people on this forum so one-dimensional? If Islam were the sole cause of this event, then surely more of the billions of Muslims worldwide would also be doing it? But oh wait, they aren't. There are clearly other factors which you anti-Islamists refuse to acknowledge, like PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES which have been mentioned by two relatively reliable newspapers.

You are essentially giving the terrorists who carry out these acts exactly what they want. ISIS would probably celebrate if tomorrow Merkel, Cameron, Hollande, etc, all announced a ban to all Muslims.

Especially hilarious, given that Islam isn't the problem here. It's embarrassing that our society has people like you who unconditionally attack islam like Islam is the sole cause of these problems, it evidently isn't.

Lol, why are you pretending you were just asking a "simple question" when you followed it up with "Why do people twist stories to suit their own hateful agendas whether it relates to race or religion"? Clearly indicating that you'd already jumped to a conclusion.

That excuse doesn't work because over 1.1 Billion muslims want the Shair'a implemented all across the world, so just because a muslim doesn't go out and kill a non-believer doesn't mean they don't support it.

Having extremist views =/= a threat to society =/= they are a terrorist

Are you the 1984 thought police now? Getting rid of Muslims for their views?

So you would have us not say anything against the faith?



You represent the classic example of the existence of the 'Regressive Left': you are unable to distinguish between Islam and Muslims. Voicing our concern with the former is not bigotry (which is incidentally what you are suggesting).

LOL, just LOL.


People like you can't be helped.