The Student Room Group

Political corectness of the anti political corectness crowd.

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
Original post by Gora The Xplorer
I'm doing nothing of the sort. The only time it should be a criminal matter is if the person's privy to sensitive knowledge have already signed non-disclosure contracts in which case the criminal proceedings would move forward on the basis of breach of contract.


What are your thoughts on blackmail then?
Original post by Dez
What are your thoughts on blackmail then?


If it's going to be treated as a criminal offence, then it should be done so on the grounds of withholding information from the police rather than demands of money or intimidating speech.
Reply 22
Original post by Desi123
[video="youtube;J2paiKp6_YU"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2paiKp6_YU[/video]

Is this the new islamic ray guns?
Original post by Galaxie501
The only people forcing something on others are the "PC" crowd.

There should be absolutely ZERO restrictions on free speech, none at all. Popular speech does not need to be protected, but unpopular speech does.

There are universities in the US that are trying to force speech codes on students, and dictate the language they have to use on campus (Michigan State Uni, I might be wrong). And this is just one of far too many dangerous examples.

This is the start of Orwellian style "speak".


Shut you gay ***** phaggot *****boy nazi
Reply 24
Original post by Gora The Xplorer
I'm doing nothing of the sort. The only time it should be a criminal matter is if the person's privy to sensitive knowledge have already signed non-disclosure contracts in which case the criminal proceedings would move forward on the basis of breach of contract.


Surely that's a civil matter?
Original post by leinad2012
Shut you gay ***** phaggot *****boy nazi


Bait.
Original post by Galaxie501
Bait.


I have a right to free speach don't I?
Original post by leinad2012
I have a right to free speach don't I?


Sure, that was my whole point. That still doesnt change the fact that it was just pseudo-edgy bait.
Reply 28
Original post by Galaxie501
Sure, that was my whole point. That still doesnt change the fact that it was just pseudo-edgy bait.


Pseudo-edgy? How would one go full edgy?
It's nothing new. The anti-"political correctness" crowd have always had their own versions of political correctness which they think people should be obliged to hold to.
Original post by Galaxie501
Sure, that was my whole point. That still doesnt change the fact that it was just pseudo-edgy bait.


Pseudo-edgy. Good lord.

My 1 rule of life, anyone who uses the term "pseudo" is normally a wannabe intellectual piece of **** :smile:
Original post by leinad2012
Pseudo-edgy. Good lord.

My 1 rule of life, anyone who uses the term "pseudo" is normally a wannabe intellectual piece of **** :smile:


¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Dont know about you, but id rather be a wannabe intellectual piece of s**t than a retarded piece of s**t. You obviously went for the latter.
(edited 7 years ago)
Reply 32
Original post by Galaxie501
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Dont know about you, but id rather be a wannabe intellectual piece of s**t than a retarded piece of s**t. You obviously went for the latter.


Is that full-edgy?
Original post by Galaxie501
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Dont know about you, but id rather be a wannabe intellectual piece of s**t than a retarded piece of s**t. You obviously went for the latter.


That's proper edgy m8.

Being serious now, have you ever heard anyone use the term "pseudo" in a way that doesn't make them sound like a pretentious piece of ****?

I remember a lecturer last year in one of my lectures claiming her father invented the term "pseudo-state", it made me want to "pseudo-vomit"
Reply 34
Original post by hovado
Is this the new islamic ray guns?


Yes :rofl2:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending