Should we stop employing male secondary school teachers?

Urgh. What the hell are you?

Please leave your vulgarity out of my thread or I shall be forced to report you.

Listen dickchops...you are the most vile cumstain I've ever encountered on this forum. You monopoloise every thread you come across with some half arsed one liner that wouldn't qualify for the Joe Longthorne show and then present yourself like you are the King of comedy on American prime time. You epitimise most of what I detest about the internet...opinions formed at the drop of a hat....petty jokes at the expense of others with no thought for their feelings and most of all the self absorbing egotistical self correction of spelling that really points out to every other poster that the highlight of your day is a **** to "big tit weekly". You don't have the friends here you perceive yourself to have and have the intellect of a gnat and the culmanation of this scenario will be your demise in a slow and agonising manner.

Be warned.

Very true, all us men are Paedophiles, all you women are stupid and emotional, all Gypsies are thieves & fly-tippers, anyone from 'up norf' is a savage, anyone from 'dawnn souf' is a posh brat. I would put more mocking stereotypes in here but the only examples I can think of at the moment would probably spark anger from some idiot who doesn't understand jest.

Seriously, get a life.

No.

Care to develop, or are you simply going to be childish and ignore the facts. On subject, for one there wouldn't be enough female teachers for two, why are all men sickos, and all women perfect?

don't go giving Harriet Harman any ideas....

I wouldn't want my teenage daughter (if/when I have one) to be seen by a male doctor. Most men are pervs. Women aren't.

1. We could have a recruitment drive for females. I know plenty of women who would be willing to spend 3 or 4 years training to become a teacher. We could also import them from Afghanistan and the like. And we could also look at recruiting more gay (male) teachers. And we're in the 21st century, so it won't be long before someone developes a robotic teacher - I don't think it's that far away.

2. I didn't say all men are sickos, nor did I say all women are perfect. But you can't ignore the fact that men are much, much more likely to be pervs than women. Women generally aren't attracted to adolescents (let's say 16/17), whereas most men naturally are.

What's more important, refraining from being sexist towards men, or protecting our nation's girls?

Woah, did you have some sort of neo-feminist mother or something? why do you have such a low view of men? Only two main things to say to you- 1) BIG generalisation, 2)YOU are a man....are you a perv?

1. We could have a recruitment drive for females. I know plenty of women who would be willing to spend 3 or 4 years training to become a teacher. We could also import them from Afghanistan and the like. And we could also look at recruiting more gay (male) teachers. And we're in the 21st century, so it won't be long before someone developes a robotic teacher - I don't think it's that far away.

2. I didn't say all men are sickos, nor did I say all women are perfect. But you can't ignore the fact that men are much, much more likely to be pervs than women. Women generally aren't attracted to adolescents (let's say 16/17), whereas most men naturally are.

What's more important, refraining from being sexist towards men, or protecting our nation's girls?

I'm not so sure they can be trusted around girls. They are only human, afterall. And you hear of the amount of stories about girls being preyed upon, and those we hear of must only be a drop in the ocean.

Anyone else agree that schools would be a much safer place if they were inhabited by female teachers only?

Do Crimewatch take requests for reconstructions?