OCR A2 Bio unit 1 - Not bad! what's the problem??

Im embarassed to say the least that i've raised my voice against OCR A2 bio unit 1, becauss quite frankly that paper was beautiful and followed the specification nicely apart from the seal question! which was meant to be a synoptic question. I do realise now that people shouldn't be complaining about this paper but rather stand up and move on!
the AQA bio unit 4 candidates have every right to stand up and voice their concerns because the paper was clearly a paper written by a drunk examiner overly obsessed with shrews!

i cannot understand how you can say something like that. quit frankly we can look at this from two perspectives.
first of all the specification was so detailed the amount of time i spent revising the biochemistry details from glycolysis to adrenalin - cyclic amp - the list goes on for ever , and then the exam contains only 2 topics.
Nerves was the main thing that came up that was fine but then again the photosynthesis expirmental question wat the hell was that ........it was an exam not a practical.
The question about dialysis was very vague not worded properly.
The question about why the equation was over simplified.
there are many bad things on this paper ..........it was a good paper for those who just skimmed through the sylabus and didnt revise but for others who spent months everything looked to simple and vague.

"remarkable M" , after all those past papers you put together ......revision notes you spent time diong , your still satisified that 90% of what you did was piontless in the end ?

Seal question wasnt synoptic. It may have had multiple answers, but the most obvious answer(buffers) can be seen from the page 95 of OCR textbook.