Despite the fact RGU isn't even making it onto all the lists!!! Should definitely be top tier! 😂 Only one I can really comment on but it's a great uni with lots of support, good facilities and often boasts a good graduate employment rate. Doesn't really even get any good recognition it deserves tho tbh!
Tier 1: St. Andrews and Edinburgh (leagues ahead of all the other Scottish universities imo) Tier 2: Glasgow and Strathclyde Tier 3: Aberdeen, Dundee and Heriot-Watt Tier 4: Stirling and RGU Tier 5: Napier, Caledonian and Abertay Tier 6: West of Scotland, Queen Margaret and Highlands and Islands
Tier 1: St. Andrews and Edinburgh (leagues ahead of all the other Scottish universities imo) Tier 2: Glasgow and Strathclyde Tier 3: Aberdeen, Dundee and Heriot-Watt Tier 4: Stirling and RGU Tier 5: Napier, Caledonian and Abertay Tier 6: West of Scotland, Queen Margaret and Highlands and Islands
lol wut?
Glasgow is a Russell-Group uni and should be tier 1
Why is Strathclyde often put into a different tier than Stirling in this thread? They are joint in The Complete University Guide, Stirling are in front of Strathclyde in the Guardian, in front of Strathclyde in Times Higher Education and Strathclyde in front of Stirling in QS. Where’s the difference?
Its probably because strathclyde does so well in individual subject rankings. League tables dont always represent how good a university is. If you look at entry standards strathclyde has the 5th highest so it is obviously a popular choice which is why people may view it as a better university. Nonetheless Stirling is still a good uni and is probably better than strathclyde for some subjects. id probably tier 1: St andrew and edinburgh tier 2: Glasgow and Strathclyde tier 4: Aberdeen and Heriott watt tier 5: Dundee and Stirling the rest
Obviously for many subjects these ranks wouldnt apply. For example, for engineering/ business glasgow and strathclyde would be better than ed or St andrews. Most are good unis anyway so if one is more convenient than the other it probably wouldnt make a big difference in career prospects.
Why is Strathclyde often put into a different tier than Stirling in this thread? They are joint in The Complete University Guide, Stirling are in front of Strathclyde in the Guardian, in front of Strathclyde in Times Higher Education and Strathclyde in front of Stirling in QS. Where’s the difference?
For me (from my experiences visiting the universities and seeing the type of students that get accepted into these universities) - Tier 1: Edinburgh, St Andrews, Glasgow Tier 2: Strathclyde (Strathy is in a tier of its because IN SOME CASES it is better for certain courses than the universities in tier one, although for some subjects like english or history it might even be below the universities in tier 3. Courses like engineering, science and business are extremely strong at Strathclyde, arguably better than Glasgow, Edinburgh etc.) Tier 3: Aberdeen, Heriot Watt, Dundee. Tier 4: Glasgow Caledonian, Edinburgh Napier, Stirling, RGU. Tier 5: Abertay, UWS, Queen Margaret, UHI.
This can change a lot depending on the course offered. University ranking systems are pretty flawed in general, and I think the difference between universities in the top ten (and even the top twenty) is pretty minimal. Ranking universities into tiers, or looking at specific courses, seems to be more beneficial than determining which university is number one, number two or number three...
All depends on the course, I chose my course based on the city and how I can balance work and study, makes life a whole lot easier when commuting is taken out of the equation.
Its probably because strathclyde does so well in individual subject rankings. League tables dont always represent how good a university is. If you look at entry standards strathclyde has the 5th highest so it is obviously a popular choice which is why people may view it as a better university. Nonetheless Stirling is still a good uni and is probably better than strathclyde for some subjects. id probably tier 1: St andrew and edinburgh tier 2: Glasgow and Strathclyde tier 4: Aberdeen and Heriott watt tier 5: Dundee and Stirling the rest
Obviously for many subjects these ranks wouldnt apply. For example, for engineering/ business glasgow and strathclyde would be better than ed or St andrews. Most are good unis anyway so if one is more convenient than the other it probably wouldnt make a big difference in career prospects.
I would agree, but some unis just have very different departments for the same course, for example; strathclyde had a civil eng dept geared heavily towards environmental engineering, and edinburgh had its, going more towards structural and had some pretty cool fire labs as well
I added steps to the ranking because they are of a similar level so for most courses the universities would be equal but for the likes of st andrews, glasgow and aberdeen they would still be considered slightly better over all within their tier.
It depends on your course tbh. Some are more prestegious than others and have higher entry requirements but doesn't mean they're better. I spoke to a doctor and she said it's known that Glasgow is the best for medicine so she studied there and she said it turns out it actually wasn't the best. As for unrecognised universities like Robert Gordon and abertay, abertay has one of the best courses in computer games in Europe.
For 2024 I’d definitely have it as Tier1: Edinburgh and St Andrews Tier2: Glasgow and Strathclyde Tier3: Dundee, Aberdeen, Stirling, Herriot watt Tier4: Napier, Glasgow cali, RGU Tier5: QMU, Abertay, UHI, UWS