I'm currently 29 and had unconditional offers this year to study physics at King's College, Queen Mary's and University of Hertfordshire.
I completed the first year of an Open University Natural Sciences degree to gain a Certificate in Higher Education. In the modules I chose to do a 30 credit maths module and a 10 point astronomy module.
When doing my research I found that many universities would rather have A levels, however this can be difficult as a mature student. Access courses are great, but universities (especially Oxbridge and other Russell Group) will favour applicants with a levels. I made the decision to go for a level 4 qualification (Cert HE) over an access course (level 3) making sure I had appropriate evidence of an interest in the subject and mathematical ability.
It is very important to show evidence of what you can do! How do I know this? I applied last year with my current qualifications and didn't get any offers. This year I applied again and sent of portfolios containing mathematics and physics assignments that I completed for the OU. Got 3 offers.
There are pro's and con's to going through this route, however, I think it shows the uni you are capable of degree level study.
I didn't consider applying to Oxbridge as I felt I'd never stand a chance of getting in. My average result through my Cert HE was about 85% (which probably equates to 3 - 4 A* grades over chemistry, biology, physics and maths.) To be entirely fair, I didn't expect to get offers from King's or Queen Mary's. So maybe I should have tried, but I am very happy with my firm option, it would have been my first choice anyway.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile