OCR Psychology Core Studies G542 May 2014

ohhh nooooo!!
I don't like that study..
well.. it's alrightttt....

i think Samuel and Bryant is easier than reicher haslam but i think its more likely that reicher and haslam is going to come up as it only came once (i think)

I've got a feeling Reicher and Haslam will come up as it's only come up once since the start of the spec, also thinking the same for the behaviourist perspective for section C

Yeah you're right i went through all of them These are how many times they came up
Loftus and Palmer: 3
Baren Cohen : 2
Savage-Rumbaugh: 1

Reicher and Haslam: 1
Milgram: 2
Pilliavin: 2

Maguire: 1
Sperry: 2
Dement and Kleitman: 2

Samuel and Bryant: 2
Bandura: 2
Freud: 2

Rosenhan: 3
Thigpen & cleckley: 2
Griffiths: 2

Obviously they may randomly choose the studies, but its a good chance to go over Maguire, Reichar and Haslam and Savage-rumbaugh

Does anyone think that developmental/psychodynamic will come up?

The two most likely Section C topics to come up are Developmental and the Behaviourist perspective, but we never know! They could be mean and question on the two approaches that came up in the June 13 paper (Physiological and ID) but of course that's very unlikely as the same approach has never come up twice in consecutive papers.

But who knows!
Good luck everyone for tomorrow!

Why do you say Developmental is going to come up? What about the psychodynamic perspective?

I have a grade level answers for the evaluation of approaches if that helps? Mainly for the for the studies evaluations as standardisation/generalisation/ethics/reliabilty/validity can be run through and either listed as strength or weakness of a study and why.
Hope this helped

I have a grade level answers for the evaluation of approaches if that helps? Mainly for the for the studies evaluations as standardisation/generalisation/ethics/reliabilty/validity can be run through and either listed as strength or weakness of a study and why.
Hope this helped