Should 'Page 3' be banned?

And another thing, it promotes unrealistic views of a woman's physique, most of the models on page 3 have probably had breast augmentation surgery.

No, your statement was so ridiculous and void of reason that my comparison was sound.

Your view is totally one sided and other posters have highlighted the flaws, which seem to be present in most of the views of people who are anti page 3.

Page 3 models are not allowed to have had boob jobs.

You totally just avoided all the valid points I made, if you can't have a real debate with real reason behind your logic then don't debate at all.

And I am sure they are telling the truth....

care to elaborate on what you would think about a man being printed on page 3 with the description I gave previously?

I specifically didn't ignore them. I deliberately the mentioned the fact that other posters have highlighted the flaws in your opinion, which is much the same as many posters before you.

I wouldn't care. I have no problem with magazines like Heat printing "celeb torso of the week" or whatever they call it and while I might not like Heat magazine, it has nothing to do with me being offended by topless men.

Offended isn't the right word, and it would have to be naked men, a topless man and a topless woman clearly isn't equal. And if it was as popular a tabloid as The Sun you may think differently, and this isn't just a topless man, it's a naked guy who's clearly WAY above average in every sense of the word.

Offended isn't the right word, and it would have to be naked men, a topless man and a topless woman clearly isn't equal. And if it was as popular a tabloid as The Sun you may think differently, and this isn't just a topless man, it's a naked guy who's clearly WAY above average in every sense of the word.

What the ****, why not? neither are exposing their genitalia.

Because a woman's chest is (unfortunately) far more sexualised and taboo than a man's chest.

Its time we progressed. Desexualise women's chests.

De-sexualise breasts?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH0AILH519E

At work, thus it is highly unlikely that I will click that link.

lmao it ain't breasts, it's Ian Paisley.

It is only sexualised because we make it sexualised.

Social norms change all the time. 100 years ago women's legs were sexualised and showing your thighs was the equivalent of going topless today.

Nowadays women freely walk around in shorts or skirts with their thighs out and no-one bats an eyelid. In more advanced civilisations, women can walk around topless without anyone commenting or thinking it unusual or indecent.

Its time we progressed. Desexualise women's chests.

I agree. The way to do that isn't to have them in a national newspaper with the intention of men glaring at them, however.