Muslim breaks mans jaw with knuckle duster in Brighton for being gay.

Omg true

Combat barbaric savagery with more barbaric savagery. You'd probably fit in with extremists much better then you'd like to.

I'm gay and think death should be an option for these one-celled brain twatheads

I'm not and I think you're being OTT

I'm gay and think death should be an option for these one-celled brain twatheads

Err.. no? You know they can change their views, and even if they refuse to, holding an opinion isn't a reason to kill them if they haven't committed anything close to murder. You'd be even worse in your response then they have, and bring about injustice.

How so? Death option is far cheaper than putting in prison.

So, if someone breaks someone jaw then say " I've changed my view " gets out of prison and does it again. What then?

That logic can be used for literally every crime ever. Cheaper =/= better.

Besides, it's been shown throughout human history that draconian sentencing doesn't do anything to reduce crime.

No no no, you said: 'appaling. the death penalty needs to be brought back just for homophobes'
This includes anyone who is homophobic, even ones who haven't committed a violent act, not just this certain man who assaulted a homosexual.

To answer your question, this situation has already been recognized by UK law. They are kept in jail for a longer sentence. I think they also receive counseling for this specific view of sexuality that evokes a aggressive and physical response, but I'm not too sure - it would just make sense to me.

As a gay man, I find it interesting that you identify him as a Muslim first and homophobe second. You also imply it's religiously (specifically, Islam) motivated but conveniently don't offer any commentary on the structural homophobia present in our society due to Christian influence. This kind of homophobia isn't unique to Islam and using the gay community to try and curry favour for your Islamophobia is kind of gross.

Hopefully any young LGBT* people on here will have enough sense to realise if your Islamphobic sentiments were realised and by some method or another, practice of Islam came to an end in the UK, people like you would no doubt immediately turn on the next marginalised community - which could well be our own.

That was someone else.

No no no, you said: 'appaling. the death penalty needs to be brought back just for homophobes'
This includes anyone who is homophobic, even ones who haven't committed a violent act, not just this certain man who assaulted a homosexual.

To answer your question, this situation has already been recognized by UK law. They are kept in jail for a longer sentence. I think they also receive counseling for this specific view of sexuality that evokes a aggressive and physical response, but I'm not too sure - it would just make sense to me.

It's quite the troubling dilemma, the two most practised religions both support homophobia yet the UK is trying to dismiss and end homophobia. I'm personally in favour of the latter, I want homophobia to end, but two ancient books practised by billions prevents this.

This circumstance is especially effective in non-Western/non-AC parts such as places around Middle East, Africa where these views on homosexuality are not widely challenged.

My bad. So who do you mean specifically when you talk about administrating the death penalty?

Anyone who wants to be violent and break jaws etc... should either get the same treatment, and pay the treatment bill, and a prison sentence, if they are in prison for life then they should just have death penalty if they are actually 100% proven of doing it.

Breaking someone's jaw is not immense enough for the perpetrator to get jailed for life, killed, or for their action to be reciprocated on them (two wrongs don't make a right). They should however serve a prison sentence fit for that specific offence and should pay for the victim's health bills for the medical operations.

Anyone who wants to be violent and break jaws etc... should either get the same treatment, and pay the treatment bill, and a prison sentence, if they are in prison for life then they should just have death penalty if they are actually 100% proven of doing it.

I do like your idea of the perpetrator paying for the treatment of the victim: an additional form of punishment while also helping the victim and relieve a bit of monetary stress on free healthcare services though finding the money can be a hassle if thy haven't got it with them. For the last bit, I don't agree with the death penalty, but if I did, I'd say that's a fair policy.