Racists get a taste of their own medicine

Except the left isn't self-flagellating. Are the american liberal celebrities who are lecturing european leaders taking in refugees themselves?

Imprisonment and killing cannot be put in the same category.

And no, it's not for those of us who have moved past the dark ages, it's not a mere case of disagreement.

Actually they can, both are used as methods of curtailing consistent law breakers.

Whichever means the Government uses is acceptable by me.

One is a civilised method, the other is barbaric and belongs in the past.

They support a racist party



Yes, they are.



Come on, if somebody joins your local neo nazi party, that's not technically illegal, but it is very immoral, and a sign that they are an awful person.

Why did the Nazis put a flight tax of between 60-100% on the properties of the Jews wishing to emigrate, as well as preventing them from getting foreign currencies and freezing their bank account, if they had wanted to encourage emigration?

Its the leader

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/german-police-should-shoot-refugees-says-german-party-leader-a6844611.html

The fact she hasn't been drowned by middle management shows complicity, it's a racist party.

The content of the articles about policy show them to be xenophobic, rather than racist.

I think that "racist" could be in the running for the most misused word on TSR. Along with "evidence" and "true", amongst others.

Yes, gun them down like subhumans, nothing Nazi about that at all.

I'm simply opposing the opinions of far-right apologists that they are not racist. That doesn't mean I care what happens to them as a result of their details being published.

Throwing in an irrelevant strawman

does not detract from the fact that some of you clearly think that it is acceptable to condone the use violence and killing as a solution to every issue.

So capital punishment is barbaric?

Are there xenophobic people that aren't racist?

It is entirely possible as they are two different things. A Venn diagram will certainly show an overlap, but they are by no means the same.
In my experience, many people who are labelled "racists" are actually xenophobes, and some are neither.
What would you call a black or Asian plumber bemoaning an influx of "bloody Polish" tradesmen? Is it racism, xenophobia, or just economic self-interest? Or a combination? The issue is nowhere near as clear as people on both sides often attempt to portray it.

So capital punishment is barbaric?

So if some impressionable youth from a far-right family and environment is killed because their details were leaked, you wouldn't care.
Can I assume that likewise, you wouldn't care about the death of the Palestinian child who is encouraged to throw stones at IDF soldiers? (After all, they are both essentially misguided youngsters engaging in behaviour against percieved interlopers, that they are not entirely responsible for).

You see, when it all comes down, your position is no better that theirs. The dehuamanisation of an out-group, and dissasociation from their fate, is classic Nazi tactics.
Oops, look what I just did!

So when the Grenztruppen were gunning down people trying to cross the border to the West, were they Nazis as well?

These sorts of discussions would be far less annoying if people had an understanding of the subjects they make their definitive statements about. I mean, most people don't seem to know the difference between "racist" and "xenophobe". And others seem to assume that anyone who behaves with inhumanity towards their fellow man is a "Nazi".


Also, can you gun someone down "like a human"? And is that any less unacceptable?

Yes.