Well, seeing as I'm back I figure I'd give a little background of where I stand on some of football's issues of the day. Hopefully this'll arouse discussion.
My team is Manchester United, and yes I do go and see them so don't start. I believe we're too young as a squad to challenge for the Premiership for a couple of years but stand more than a good chance in knock-out tournaments. In my opinion we need a central midfielder in the mould of Michael Carrick, Andrea Pirlo, Xavi etc, a deep-lying orchestrator of play with superior passing technique; proper cover for Gabriel Heinze because John O'Shea isn't natural enough there, and a plan B for when Wayne Rooney is unavailable (I propose two wingers to support the centre-forward, like how Chelsea operate). If I had a second team it would be Barcelona, I love them and all they stand for.
A word on the arch-nemesis Arsenal: they are on a decline. They are too full of foreigners for any proper team spirit to manifest itself, and they have no solution to the absence of the wonderful Thierry Henry. But come the close season they will have much to look forward to, with a new stadium and a potent threat in Robin van Persie. They could do with a centre-back, perhaps as captain.
I can't not mention Chelsea, so I will state that while I begrudge their overnight success and wealth (no parallels to be drawn with United, our money was earned from prior footballing success), I am satisfied that no one else truly believes their success is authentic. And, while their attack will suffice against the average Premiership team, I wouldn't consider it world-class. Didier Drogba in particular is not fit to play for European contenders, however good he thinks he is: he is a poor man's Samuel Eto'o (not often Chelsea are called the poor man!).
That'll do for now, more opinions will emerge as more discussion takes place.