Noticed something about this game. AVB initially got messed over, initially the first two goals were down to goalkeeping errors, I'm not one to make excuses, but when you're two nil down for no reason, there's little to no blame you can attribute to the manager.
At the point after is where you could blame the manager, which has happened in many other cases, zurich of all people should know when chasing a game rather than defending all match has ended up in the team receiving a battering, so should united fans, my club dished one out to united when united won the treble, and city also dished one out when they decided to chase the game back at 3-1.
It seems that AVB is starting to have similar problems to what he encountered at chelsea, anyway back to my point, he then decides to chase the game even more, I believe that AVB is a very proactive manager, but is not a reactive manager, at the point where he realised that lloris wasn't going to save the pathetic excuses for offside traps and covering of the likes of dawson and kaboul like he did against arsenal and many other games the past season and a half, he should have parked bus(the 3-0 stage) however as has happened to him(3-3 draw at united) he felt that he could dominate the opposition despite citys counter-attacking prowess and generally stronger midfield.
Again, one can attribute that problem in defence to shifting your best CB out of position and playing kaboul(who has had little PL time am I right?) Anyway, he had the right idea in taking off townsend and starting lamela out on the left and lennon on the right, sandro could have been sent off although wasn't too bad in the first half, but he would have been better suited with dembele, or playing in a 4-3-3 to restrict the space of toure and fernandinho.
Final point, I'd fine all the back 4 if I was AVB.