Modern Warfare 3 society

G36C and the ACR.

Honestly prefer the G36C. Seems to be the best weapon so far for putting people down.

The ACR feels a bit trashy, to be honest.

I'd probably say the G36C and the Type 95 are the best I've used so far.

Can I ask why you don't like the multiplayer?

I still play Black Ops because I frown upon change!

However, one day...one day I will play MW3!

"I can't come back to any of that, so I'll throw out a random game and call him a fanboy of it"

lol, no.

Bad Company games were terrible. To that end, that's one reason why Battlefield 3 is weaker than Battlefield 2.

I've played and owned every single CoD game since the series began in 2003 and I also played its spiritual predecessor, MoH:AA a lot.

Everything I've said is true. The maps aren't as good as CoD4 or MW2's. Better than Treyarch's, but you could **** on a piece of paper and it'd be a better map. Well, that's more of an opinion, but I personally don't think the maps shine. Weapons do have increased power, as if they had Stopping Power, so there's less emphasis on aiming since you kill with 2-3 bullets at all times.

So before you get on your uppity horse and defend MW3 because you think someone's smearing it, like a fanboy would, think for a second, because they're honest criticisms from my point of view.

why is no one telling me how to record gameplay and what is that camera in multiplayer for?

How can i record gameplay? thank you

Why do you think BF2 is better than BF3. I have both and personally enjoy BF3 more?

The first couple of days I was 1.8 KD, now im 1.5, it seems my aggressive style was good on release day and the couple of days after but as I play more, more players are camping. It is horrible. I haven't found the gun for me yet either.

Finally, there is not one stand out map. They are all gash at best. Treyarch are the superior developers for me.

Because BF3 had a change of pace. As much as I enjoy the fast pacing of Battlefield games when you get into the thick of things, there's nothing like Dragon Valley, Kubra Dam, Op: Clean Sweep, etc. in BF3 so you're either in cluster**** zone or you're on the way from your deployment area.

Most maps are just 2 deployment areas. Medium-long distance. Cluster**** of flags in the centre.

The game is a little bit too easy. I may be better at FPS now than I was then, but I would never have dreamed of having a Win/Loss ratio in BF2 that was above 25.

Things like gunplay, vehicle balance, etc. They're fine, though jets could be tweaked to be slightly better. Largely because it's based off of 2142's mechanics. Deviation could be increased to lower TTKs as killing is way too easy, even at distance.

BF3 is a good game. But it definitely hasn't wowed me as much as BF2 did. It could just be that my standards have changed, but something about it just doesn't keep me coming back for more as BF games 2142 and earlier did.

There are quite a few other things that make it feel less complete as a Battlefield game. But on the whole, it's still decent and enjoyable. Better than Bad Crap anway.

I think they were trying to make it like cod4 by putting small maps in but failed.
I mean, cod4 had plenty of big maps like pipeline, overgrown, bloc, crash etc.

They also don't have any super small maps like shipment/rust which i'm pissed about.