'Furious' Kate and William may sue French magazine over publication of topless photos

Original post by johnharris19944

Oh no I agree its wrong to invade privacy of anyone but its no worse to them then a less well liked celebrity on holiday.

Yep, I agree! That's why I'd never buy any of these magazines (not that I would anyway), that have all this naked celebrity crap in it, even if there was an interesting article I'd want to read.

Reply 21

kunoichi

20

Original post by johnharris19944

Question is why are we kicking off over this when it happens to other celebrities on a daily basis and they get ripped for it but when it happens to the Royals its suddenly an injustice...

Because celebrities dont always make an effort to look respectable, they have to stay famous to make their living so will do many things for attention. Look at lindsay lohan and Britney for example getting drunk and who knows what. many celebrities just seem to rely on their scandal getting in the paper and female celebrities dont always dress smartly or modestly.

Whereas the royals try to make an effort to look respectable and represent our country. They dont generally go out making scandals of themselves. They dress and act with modesty and self respect. They constantly act with a dignity that celebrities dont.

Not that its acceptable for anyones privacy to be invaded but this is why this is considered worse i think.

Reply 22

Fat-Love

15

Original post by Beggy15

Yes I have and I didn't see many sunbathing topless. The ones who were topless were at least over 50.

Try barcelona :sexface:

Ironically though I wasn't actually fussed though despite all the hot totty. I was having too much fun in the water with friends. Don't call me gay now but I actually did not get the slightest erection so embarrassingly I forced myself to have one when I went back the next day.

Reply 23

kingme

17

Original post by Fat-Love

Ironically though I wasn't actually fussed though despite all the hot totty. I was having too much fun in the water with friends. Don't call me gay now but I actually did not get the slightest erection so embarrassingly I forced myself to have one when I went back the next day.

W.T.F.

Were all your mates calling you gay because you didn't a boner at the mere sight of boobs?

1' OR '1'='1

People should have at least some decency… She is not a cheap celebrity that wants to attract attention and I am not going to look for those photos.

Reply 26

Chief Wiggum

20

I don't really think they're concerned about decency to be honest - they just know there'd be a massive public backlash against them if they published them.

Reply 27

lonelykatana

17

Original post by Beggy15

plus who even sunbathes topless anymore?

Urmm... ****ing loads of people?
Can't walk down most of the beaches in mainland Europe without spotting titties in the wild.

Reply 28

Teenage Pirate

13

Original post by I Came

Well it's the price you pay for being famous.

Exactly, happens to celebrities every day. Most countries have privacy laws that protect people that are not celebrities from stuff like this.

Reply 29

lonelykatana

17

Original post by Fat-Love

Try barcelona :sexface:

Ironically though I wasn't actually fussed though despite all the hot totty. I was having too much fun in the water with friends. Don't call me gay now but I actually did not get the slightest erection so embarrassingly I forced myself to have one when I went back the next day.

Try on the beaches of Barcelona with your girlfriend.
Never felt so guilty in my life! I wasn't even looking, but I swear to god it was only a matter of time before she accused me of checking someone out :tongue:

Reply 30

Chesca93

I hope they do sue, maybe she shouldn't have been sunbathing topless but she was at the Queen's nephews house, it wasn't like she was on a public beach!

Reply 31

Chief Wiggum

20

That's true, but I think the public would feel more anger about Kate photos getting published - she's seen as more innocent and respectable than Harry.

Reply 32

jumpingjesusholycow

18

Hmm. It is obviously pretty crude for a photographer to go to such extreme measures just to nab a picture of her nazzers. However, if she really, really didn't want any opportunity for such a photo to be taken, she could have just y'know...not gotten topless outdoors? I'm not using that as a pretext to pin the blame on her, but this could easily have been prevented.

Reply 33

tehFrance

17

Original post by NutterFrutter

I've been attempting to find these images for the last half hour. Anyone got a link? :dice:

The magazine is released tomorrow I think... then again I don't buy it so I could be wrong but the downloaded ones I have in PDF was listed Closer 378 - 8 au 14 Septembre 2012 so I presume Closer 379 - 15 au ? Septembre 2012 :smile:

Reply 34

tehforum

20

Original post by kingme

Using firefox, and google stores searches when in private mode. That's why ask jeeves is my go-to porn engine.

It shouldn't store your searches.

Reply 35

Nicky Thomas

Below expectation tbh...

I mean wtf!? Who would be so disrespectful to take such photos of them chilling out -.- the media seriously does go too far "omg look there are royal boobies", the media at closer are just royal french cocks.

Reply 36

username533239

17

Original post by jph12

As I said on a previous post, I think it is disgusting if an invasion of privacy like that happens to anyone, not just a royal.

How is it an invasion of privacy? If you have your boobs out then..you have your boobs out. What else is there to expect. Of course people'll take photos of Famous people in that position.

Reply 37

Greenlaner

11

Original post by Chief Wiggum

That's true, but I think the public would feel more anger about Kate photos getting published - she's seen as more innocent and respectable than Harry.

When it comes to invasions of privacy, don't the public have better things to be getting angry about? Like the fact that over 200 schools in Britain have been putting hidden CCTV cameras in toilets and changing rooms?

That should be a far bigger issue than a few photographs of some royal's tits.

Reply 38

Nicky Thomas

Original post by Greenlaner

When it comes to invasions of privacy, don't the public have better things to be getting angry about? Like the fact that over 200 schools in Britain have been putting hidden CCTV cameras in toilets and changing rooms?

That should be a far bigger issue than a few photographs of some royal's tits.

But they are royalty :eek:

... Wait a sec did you just say 200 Schools in 'Britain' having CCTV in Toilets and Changing rooms or are you just referring to England?

Reply 39

sugar-n-spice

1

Original post by jph12

I think everyone fancies Kate, be they gay, straight or otherwise. She's very beautiful.

Not really. She's like Hermione Granger, somewhat good looking but people go nuts for her because of what she's connected with.

'Furious' Kate and William may sue French magazine over publication of topless photos

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you