'Furious' Kate and William may sue French magazine over publication of topless photos

The uncensored images go against our nudity policy

So put a warning saying link contains images of breasts.

Wow she has much bigger boobs that I should she'd have!

Although they're still just breasts, I don't know why all this fuss is being made.

[INDENT]

We don't allow nude images regardless of warnings

Why was my post - which broke no forum rules whatsoever - deleted?

I would like an independent inquiry ordered to look into unfair deletion, and compensation awarded if deemed necessary.

Kate was in the open air on a beach, where anybody on the sea could have seen her I'd be more annoyed if I was Harry, in a private room and someone took a photo to sell on - there's a betrayal of trust there whereas Kate was just naive.

No she wasn't, she was in a private house on a rooftop terrace with William in an area of complete seclusion, Harry invited random strangers into his hotel room.

It would've been great if she came out and said... "Yeah I don't really care"

Complete seclusion? It was open air, and as I said, anyone on the sea could see her. If I had to weigh up who could expect privacy more, I'd say Harry. Who really expects privacy outdoors?

Was it not enclosed? I was under the impression that they were staying in a very secluded area with not much around and certainly not visible to the public, unless you believe Closer...

The fact is that Harry invited them in and allowed the photograph to take place as he was posing, whereas Kate had photographs taken without her permission when she thought she had privacy.

If I were on a rooftop terrace in the middle of nowhere I should as hell would expect privacy.

Meh, maybe people being should stop making a big deal out of women's boobs anyway - why they have to be seen as scandalous compared to men's chests is a little strange tbh. It's just so weird how society is.

I don't agree with the publication of the photos; I think it's a complete violation of privacy, however one I thing I would like to know, is:

Why is a naked picture of Prince Harry allowed and is almost socially acceptable amongst the British media and public, but a topless picture of Kate Middleton is suddenly horrible, even though newspapers like the Sun publish topless women every day?

Just seems to me like double standards; but I want to reiterate that I don't agree with the original publication anyway, once these pictures are on the internet, there is no government in the world with enough jurisdiction and ability to remove it from the whole internet.

Complete seclusion? It was open air, and as I said, anyone on the sea could see her. If I had to weigh up who could expect privacy more, I'd say Harry. Who really expects privacy outdoors?

The pictures of Harry were taken in his presence, by people he had invited back. It is also apparent that his "minders" saw people taking pictures and only gave a weak protest against it, then allowed it.

The pictures of Kate were taken while she was on PRIVATE property, by persons who were NOT invited to do so, while she was completely out of view from the public. If it was someone who HAD been invited in to the gardens who had taken the pictures, then it would be a completely different story.

Therefore, no double standards