The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Maloneyyy
I used the sun as M and the Earth as m


What about r? It should be 10^11 because it's km.
Reply 781
I can never do these questions with point charges or with gravitational where you have to find where the force is zero, could anyone tell me how to do it?
Original post by dudesamld
It would be pretty mean for them to ask but take a look at this : http://tap.iop.org/vibration/shm/306/page_46606.html
its a lesson plan on the experiment


how come in water its light damping but in oil its heavy damping?
Original post by Rock_Set
It says the 'conductor'. Read the examiners report for the love of the god.


Sorry, I got it wrong.

Who the **** reads the examiner's report?
Original post by BigBadJFly
Sorry, I got it wrong.

Who the **** reads the examiner's report?


People who want model answers for the 6 markers lol
Original post by GeekChic7
Okay, either revision has got to me more than I thought or I'm going blind, but I can't see it saying anywhere about an EMF in the rod? I can only see it about an EMF in the ring?


D'oh, sorry my bad. Just as well I told you what paper it was :biggrin:
Original post by BigBadJFly
Sorry, I got it wrong.

Who the **** reads the examiner's report?


So no EMF in the rod then?

Sorry, no, we're good :')
Original post by YOOZERNAYME
Anyone know how to do Q2? ImageUploadedByStudent Room1402431228.044640.jpg:smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile



bump :tongue:
Original post by Rock_Set
People who want model answers for the 6 markers lol


I got 5/6 marks on it, and usually get 6/6.

I got 8 marks into an A*, and I've never read an examiner's report for physics :s-smilie:
Original post by Rock_Set
What about r? It should be 10^11 because it's km.


Oh yeah, just tried that but it still doesn't work
Reply 790
Does anyone know if we need to understand back emf? Please say no
Original post by YOOZERNAYME
Anyone know how to do Q2? ImageUploadedByStudent Room1402431228.044640.jpg:smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile


As T is proportional to root L and if T is halved then L must have been divided by 4. As you would be left with a quarter of L, then by taking away 600mm is the same as taking away 3/4L. So 600 = 3L/4 Rearranging gives L=800.
Original post by cem101
how come in water its light damping but in oil its heavy damping?


Oil is presumed to be more viscous than water, so provides greater resistance :smile:
Hello, can someone please explain this Q to me, thanks :smile: Fullscreen capture 10062014 212032.bmp.jpg
Original post by YOOZERNAYME
Anyone know how to do Q2? ImageUploadedByStudent Room1402431228.044640.jpg:smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile


Set up your equation for T at the original length.

T=2πlgT=2\pi \sqrt \dfrac{l}{g}.

Then, if the time period is halved and ll is reduced by 600×103600 \times 10^{-3}

12T=2πl600×103g\dfrac{1}{2}T=2\pi \sqrt \dfrac{l-600 \times 10^{-3}}{g}.

Then, multiplying through, substituting for T and cancelling

l=4l2.4l=4l-2.4.

I think that gives the answer as A, couldn't tilt my head far enough to see :tongue:.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by lharris
At least we can be sure its not that then!!


Id prefer that to induction hahaah
Original post by Keeks52
Does anyone know if we need to understand back emf? Please say no


It's not actually required for this specification as far as I'm aware.
Original post by M8976
I can never do these questions with point charges or with gravitational where you have to find where the force is zero, could anyone tell me how to do it?


right, if force is =zero then E=0 as E=F/Q.

E =Q/r^2 (proportionate)

r= x for the 8 charge and r= 60-x for the 2 charge.

8/x^2 = 2/(60-x)^2

divide by two, sq rt then solve. its 40 btw.
Original post by Plmnko543
As T is proportional to root L and if T is halved then L must have been divided by 4. As you would be left with a quarter of L, then by taking away 600mm is the same as taking away 3/4L. So 600 = 3L/4 Rearranging gives L=800.


ah perfect thanks!!
Original post by BigBadJFly
I got 5/6 marks on it, and usually get 6/6.

I got 8 marks into an A*, and I've never read an examiner's report for physics :s-smilie:


I don't recall asking for any of that information. I never said it was essential. You asked a question, I answered it from my experience.

Latest

Trending

Trending