I'm Jewish ask me anything
Scroll to see replies
Original post by tehFrance
So you're an Israeli first and a Jew second then... I'm a Frenchman first and a Jew second myself which is how it's supposed to be.
Je suis aussi un Juif français, mais pourquoi tu supportes les Palestiniens je comprends pas pourquoi tu les defend... Ce sont eux qui sont en tord pas nous, en plus ta vu ce que les musulmans de France ont fait aux juifs de sarcelle y'a pas quelques jours?
je suis née en France mais je me considére juif d'abord et après je suis français.
Google Translation:
I am also a French Jew, but why you put up with the Palestinians I do not understand why you defend them ... They are the ones who are not wrong us, see what your most Muslims in France were Jews there teal did not a few days?
I was born in France but I consider myself first a Jew and then I'm French.
^ Please edit so that it makes sense
(edited 9 years ago)
Why do you call anyone that is against Zionism anti semitic? You need a dictionary even some Jews (actually the amount is increasing now) reject Zionism they even say it is not compatible with Judaism building illegal settlements, killing innocent civilians, denying Palestinians fair water and farming rights, in 2010 David Cameron himself said Gaza is a "prison" this it self proves it the amount of lands unfairly gone. Also you love talking about Muslim terrorism thats rich from you when Zionism it self was built on terrorism look at Hagganah and Irgun they bombed people, murdered and injured others to get what they want. Look at Mossad they have links to 9/11 a truck carrying explosives was owned by a Mossad driver but he and 4 other Israelis with explosives were allowed back into Israel without being questioned. Also the Mossad helped train the terrorists in Pakistan and Afghanistan. And now the current day we have IDF who give someone a 2 min warning to leave the area Gaza is 7 miles you cant leave Gaza in 2 mins its inevitable many innocent civilians will die IDF know it. This is not being anti Semitic its a fact you always come back with excuses like Hamas this Hamas that it was UK, USA and Israel who insisted on democracy in Palestine and Hamas was the outcome
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=palestine+loss+of+land&es_sm=93&tbm=isch&imgil=bN2mXutvAuwiAM%253A%253Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fencrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com%252Fimages%253Fq%253Dtbn%253AANd9GcSOiJnBxVbPV7p-sqpCVzAb2UFFdwWdK0v0bzC14UcP5aYrNH12%253B1200%253B882%253BdaVdi6AR7v9nwM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.worldliteraturetoday.org%25252F2012%25252Fmay%25252Fno-ordinary-place-writers-and-writing-occupied-palestine-rima-najjar-merriman&source=iu&usg=__7b9p6R8cmTXfi-KHl28uhLSS2NM%3D&sa=X&ei=mA3RU4POC-7T7AbwkYCABA&ved=0CCQQ9QEwAA&biw=1242&bih=585#facrc=_&imgrc=bN2mXutvAuwiAM%253A%3BdaVdi6AR7v9nwM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.worldliteraturetoday.org%252Fsites%252Fdefault%252Ffiles%252F2012%252FMay%252Fpalestinian-loss-of-land-1946-2010.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.worldliteraturetoday.org%252F2012%252Fmay%252Fno-ordinary-place-writers-and-writing-occupied-palestine-rima-najjar-merriman%3B1200%3B882
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=palestine+loss+of+land&es_sm=93&tbm=isch&imgil=bN2mXutvAuwiAM%253A%253Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fencrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com%252Fimages%253Fq%253Dtbn%253AANd9GcSOiJnBxVbPV7p-sqpCVzAb2UFFdwWdK0v0bzC14UcP5aYrNH12%253B1200%253B882%253BdaVdi6AR7v9nwM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.worldliteraturetoday.org%25252F2012%25252Fmay%25252Fno-ordinary-place-writers-and-writing-occupied-palestine-rima-najjar-merriman&source=iu&usg=__7b9p6R8cmTXfi-KHl28uhLSS2NM%3D&sa=X&ei=mA3RU4POC-7T7AbwkYCABA&ved=0CCQQ9QEwAA&biw=1242&bih=585#facrc=_&imgrc=bN2mXutvAuwiAM%253A%3BdaVdi6AR7v9nwM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.worldliteraturetoday.org%252Fsites%252Fdefault%252Ffiles%252F2012%252FMay%252Fpalestinian-loss-of-land-1946-2010.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.worldliteraturetoday.org%252F2012%252Fmay%252Fno-ordinary-place-writers-and-writing-occupied-palestine-rima-najjar-merriman%3B1200%3B882
Original post by Modil
Without Hamas, maybe there wouldn't be such hatred and bitter rivalry spawned through multiple generations. Maybe there would be relative peace between a first-world superpower and a conquered people living in theirx third-world sects within. Hamas will never stop their attacks on Israel, and they will never stop using their own as human shields (similar to Vietnam, where sometimes there is no other option besides killing both the human shield and the aggressor hiding behind), and Israel is surely not just going to up and abandon the country they developed into a technological, fertile, world superpower in 70 years (which was still reminiscent of the dark ages 75 years ago) due to an inferior threat.
So, please, tell me what the compromise shall be? Hamas will never accept anything besides all of Israel and the diaspora of all Jews, and Israel will never release their grasp on the land without first turning the entire hemisphere into a nuclear wasteland. One one hand: people occupying an area the size of Delaware (all Palestinian territory combined) will be forced to evacuate and take refuge in one of the numerous identical cultures in the region; on the other hand: the entire Middle East, North Africa, and South East Asia is destroyed. Which is a more reasonable outcome?
Israel is just a scapegoat for their own economic, political and religious failures. What if there is no more Israel? No more fighting right? WRONG! Just look at Iraq, there's no Israel to fight there, so they just fight each other instead, Sunni vs Shia....all terrorists know how to do is kill, they don't know how to (or want to) do anything else.
So, please, tell me what the compromise shall be? Hamas will never accept anything besides all of Israel and the diaspora of all Jews, and Israel will never release their grasp on the land without first turning the entire hemisphere into a nuclear wasteland. One one hand: people occupying an area the size of Delaware (all Palestinian territory combined) will be forced to evacuate and take refuge in one of the numerous identical cultures in the region; on the other hand: the entire Middle East, North Africa, and South East Asia is destroyed. Which is a more reasonable outcome?
Israel is just a scapegoat for their own economic, political and religious failures. What if there is no more Israel? No more fighting right? WRONG! Just look at Iraq, there's no Israel to fight there, so they just fight each other instead, Sunni vs Shia....all terrorists know how to do is kill, they don't know how to (or want to) do anything else.
Original post by Datch
Palestine is not a country, nor was it ever. It was the name given to the region by the Romans when the exiled the Jews from Israel. So calling them Palestinians really isn't right. They're Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians, Lebanese, etc. Not to mention that some of them are violent and racist. Remember the Ramallah lynchings in 2000 and other anti Semitic attacks??
This
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Wilsoncw1997
No, because hospitals and other public building (excluding military compound) does not aid the out come of the war.
HOWEVER, since the terrorist is using a hospital as a bunker, which is aiding the war.
THUS, Israel has the right to bomb it.
HOWEVER, since the terrorist is using a hospital as a bunker, which is aiding the war.
THUS, Israel has the right to bomb it.
Exactly
Original post by NoJuice
Palestinians that were driven out by the joos still hold the deeds and titles to the lands and property that the zionist filth stole, never shall it be accepted nor recognised, the land will be liberated no matter how many centuries it takes, by sweat and blood, drop by drop till the zionists are made to pay
Oh please. When Israel gave back Gaza, 8,000 Jews were forced to leave their home. there was a horticutural business they created. Jews here, in the US, raised 14 million, to give to the palestinians as a gesture of peace / gift. And they BURNED THEIR OWN 10% GNP BUSINESS TO THE ****ING GROUND. And by the way??? Christians from Gaza went to Ramalah, for christimas and BEGGED, the Jews to please let them stay. Because if they go back to Gaza the Arab Muslims will slaughter them. You are in a fantasy land
What influenced you to create your thread. Be honest.
Original post by Datch
A-n-y-t-h-i-n-g
What university did you get your scholarship for?
Or was it that you got financial package?
Original post by Lasagesse
Oh please. When Israel gave back Gaza, 8,000 Jews were forced to leave their home. there was a horticutural business they created. Jews here, in the US, raised 14 million, to give to the palestinians as a gesture of peace / gift. And they BURNED THEIR OWN 10% GNP BUSINESS TO THE ****ING GROUND. And by the way??? Christians from Gaza went to Ramalah, for christimas and BEGGED, the Jews to please let them stay. Because if they go back to Gaza the Arab Muslims will slaughter them. You are in a fantasy land
I wonder who really is in fantasy land,
Original post by Datch
Yes I do support them.
600 Hamas terrorists have been killed in Gaza so far & there are marches. 120,000 have died in Syria and no marches. Why? Sunnis are massacring Shias in Iraq and no marches. Why? If muslims kill muslims then there is no problem, no issues, no Fatwa. But if Israel bombs terrorists to secure its citizens, if US bombs taliban , then muslim all over world will start protests and fake propaganda . Hypocricy at its best !!!!
600 Hamas terrorists have been killed in Gaza so far & there are marches. 120,000 have died in Syria and no marches. Why? Sunnis are massacring Shias in Iraq and no marches. Why? If muslims kill muslims then there is no problem, no issues, no Fatwa. But if Israel bombs terrorists to secure its citizens, if US bombs taliban , then muslim all over world will start protests and fake propaganda . Hypocricy at its best !!!!
This guy claims that 600 'terrorists' have been killed in Gaza. Despite proof that 75+% of causalities are civilians.
No point trying to argue with individuals who justify the murder of innocents. Such sick thoughts, they should be locked up before they get a chance to implement their abhorrent views in the real-world.
/thread
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by chrishy2012
soo you think its acceptable that innocent childrens are dying because they're "terrorists". its a bit sick dont you think?!!
No, he said hamas, not children.
Fix your own terrorist group.
How was your bar mitsvah?
Original post by broscience123
This guy claims that 600 'terrorists' have been killed in Gaza. Despite proof that 75+% of causalities are civilians.
No point trying to argue with individuals who justify the murder of innocents. Such sick thoughts, they should be locked up before they get a chance to implement their abhorrent views in the real-world.
/thread
No point trying to argue with individuals who justify the murder of innocents. Such sick thoughts, they should be locked up before they get a chance to implement their abhorrent views in the real-world.
/thread
He said Hamas ,please look at your own Islamic groups first before pointing your nose on other people problems..
The reply to the rising palestinian casualties is always that hamas use human shields can you please explain why the un fact finding report found no evidence of this and also the evidence that actually the israelis used palestinians as shields
Copied.and pasted from the report:
heres a link to what a UN investigation found for the clashes in 2008-2009
The report found that Hama did NOT use human shields and this is propaganda from the Israel side (only recently an official said "[H]ere's the difference between us. We are using missile defense to protect our civilians, and they're using their civilians to protect their missiles)
From the information available to it, the Mission found no evidence to suggest that
Palestinian armed groups either directed civilians to areas where attacks were being launched or
forced civilians to remain within the vicinity of the attacks.
also the report found that a hamas member told his family to leave the house :
About 16 hours prior to the shelling on the afternoon of 6 January 2009, Israeli armed
forces had already carried out at least one strike, destroying the house of Mr. Abu Askar. At
around 1.45 a.m. on 6 January 2009, Mr. Abu Askar received a personal telephone call from the
Israeli armed forces advising him that he should evacuate the house and everyone in it because it
was going to be destroyed by an air strike. The building housed not only his immediate family
but a large number of his extended family, about 40 in all. Mr. Abu Askar responded quickly,
evacuating not only his own extended family but also advising neighbours of the imminent
strike. The survivors of the al-Deeb family confirm they were advised at this time by Mr. Abu
Askar of the call he had received.
in fact the report said that Israel itself used human shields
On the second day of detention, the Israeli armed forces began to use a number of the
detainees as human shields. At this point the detainees had been without food and without sleep
for a day. There were constant death threats and insults. To carry out house searches, the Israelis
took off AD/03’s blindfold but he remained handcuffed. He was forced to walk in front of the
soldiers and told that, if he saw someone in the house but failed to tell the Israeli soldiers, he
would be killed.... He was punched, slapped and insulted
throughout the process.
Legal findings of whether this was true:
The Mission found the foregoing witnesses to be credible and reliable. It has no reason to
doubt the veracity of their accounts and found that the different stories serve to support the
allegation that Palestinians were used as human shields.
link to report
http://www.leksikon.org/images/goldstone_gazacrimes.pdf
Posted from TSR Mobile
Copied.and pasted from the report:
heres a link to what a UN investigation found for the clashes in 2008-2009
The report found that Hama did NOT use human shields and this is propaganda from the Israel side (only recently an official said "[H]ere's the difference between us. We are using missile defense to protect our civilians, and they're using their civilians to protect their missiles)
From the information available to it, the Mission found no evidence to suggest that
Palestinian armed groups either directed civilians to areas where attacks were being launched or
forced civilians to remain within the vicinity of the attacks.
also the report found that a hamas member told his family to leave the house :
About 16 hours prior to the shelling on the afternoon of 6 January 2009, Israeli armed
forces had already carried out at least one strike, destroying the house of Mr. Abu Askar. At
around 1.45 a.m. on 6 January 2009, Mr. Abu Askar received a personal telephone call from the
Israeli armed forces advising him that he should evacuate the house and everyone in it because it
was going to be destroyed by an air strike. The building housed not only his immediate family
but a large number of his extended family, about 40 in all. Mr. Abu Askar responded quickly,
evacuating not only his own extended family but also advising neighbours of the imminent
strike. The survivors of the al-Deeb family confirm they were advised at this time by Mr. Abu
Askar of the call he had received.
in fact the report said that Israel itself used human shields
On the second day of detention, the Israeli armed forces began to use a number of the
detainees as human shields. At this point the detainees had been without food and without sleep
for a day. There were constant death threats and insults. To carry out house searches, the Israelis
took off AD/03’s blindfold but he remained handcuffed. He was forced to walk in front of the
soldiers and told that, if he saw someone in the house but failed to tell the Israeli soldiers, he
would be killed.... He was punched, slapped and insulted
throughout the process.
Legal findings of whether this was true:
The Mission found the foregoing witnesses to be credible and reliable. It has no reason to
doubt the veracity of their accounts and found that the different stories serve to support the
allegation that Palestinians were used as human shields.
link to report
http://www.leksikon.org/images/goldstone_gazacrimes.pdf
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Datch
Palestine is not a country, nor was it ever. It was the name given to the region by the Romans when the exiled the Jews from Israel. So calling them Palestinians really isn't right. They're Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians, Lebanese, etc. Not to mention that some of them are violent and racist. Remember the Ramallah lynchings in 2000 and other anti Semitic attacks??
London was also never a country, does that mean it can become a jewish republic as it was never a country ? Jews bribed the british PM to give them power to migrate illegally .
Hornets nest ? Why does israel occupy palestine bomb gaza and impose a blockade
Hamas are not terrorist but elected representatives of people of gaza. Israel needs to stop backtracking on its agreements like arresting prisoners freed on a swap and behave like a adult
Calling hamas terrorist no one cares they are a legitimate political force in gaza with whom israel must work.
Palestinians are treated second class in their own homeland by polish immigrants
Original post by Datch
A-n-y-t-h-i-n-g
http://www.iba.org.il/program.aspx?lcode=6570
What is the name of that israeli song?
Original post by Alisa59
No, he said hamas, not children.
Fix your own terrorist group.
Fix your own terrorist group.
yet its the childrens that are paying the price of this! we cant act like nothing is wrong
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Does religion matter
- The TSR Jewish Society (J-Soc) - thread TWO
- I am half russian, half israeli, ask me anything.
- Mossad Application Help
- Switching degrees as a UCL offer holder?
- My dad is Jewish. My mom isn't
- Why has no one ever made movies about the journeys of ibn batutta
- I am an Israeli - AMA
- Which jewish festival is the most well known?
- Made mistakes in my exam - messed up on events and dates and would like some clarity
- I’m british Pakistani girl. Ask me anything...
- Claims that a 9 year-old boy was treated poorly by staff ‘because he’s Jewish’
- how could anyone be pro-israel?
- OCR A-level Religious Studies Paper 3 (Judaism) - 20th June 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Political Quiz: Are you a fascist?
- Un sac de billes chapter by chapter
- does ucl do clearing?
- Sex and masturbation after adult cirumcision
- Anyone else not get boycotting brands or even countries trend?
- Can someone help me answer this or give a guide?
Latest
Trending
Last reply 4 days ago
If you could instantly become fluent in any foreign language which one would it be?Last reply 3 months ago
About the NCUK IFY Program for university Studies in the UKTrending
Last reply 4 days ago
If you could instantly become fluent in any foreign language which one would it be?Last reply 3 months ago
About the NCUK IFY Program for university Studies in the UK
